Literature DB >> 27008183

Very low local recurrence rates after breast-conserving therapy: analysis of 8485 patients treated over a 28-year period.

S C J Bosma1, F van der Leij1, E van Werkhoven2, H Bartelink1, J Wesseling3, S Linn4,5, E J Rutgers6, M J van de Vijver7, P H M Elkhuizen8.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to study the impact of changes in clinical practice on outcome in patients treated with breast-conserving therapy (BCT) over a period of 28 years. Patients with early invasive breast cancer, who were treated with BCT at the Netherlands Cancer Institute between 1980 and 2008, were studied. Clinical characteristics, treatment and outcome were compared between groups (1980-1987; 1988-1998; 1999-2008). The main endpoint analyzed was ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR). 8485 patients with a median follow-up of 9 years (IQR 6-14 years) were analyzed. The cumulative 5- and 10-year IBTR incidences were, respectively, 2 and 5 % for the whole cohort and 4 and 9 % in patients ≤40 years. Young age was a significant risk factor for IBTR in multivariable analysis. IBTR-free interval was better for patients who received a RT boost (HR 0.65) or systemic therapy (HR 0.52). In later years, patients less often received a boost and more often underwent adjuvant systemic treatment. 761 patients (9.0 %) underwent a re-excision; the tumor resection margins were tumor free for 85 %. In later years (1999-2008), 89 % of patients had a tumor-free margin. The margin status of invasive carcinoma did not influence IBTR, DM rate, or OS. Between 1980 and 2008, locoregional control after BCT remained stable with low IBTR rates, even in young patients. These good results were achieved under the policy of accepting close or focally positive margins, indicating this is a safe approach. The results of this study may help in lowering the re-excision rates, which are high in many centers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Breast-conserving therapy; Local control; Tumor-free margins

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27008183     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-016-3732-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  15 in total

1.  Mastectomy or Breast-Conserving Therapy: Which Factors Influence A Patient's Decision?

Authors:  David Moiel; John Thompson; Kenneth D Larsen
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2019-06-14

2.  Breast-conserving therapy is safe both within BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and noncarriers with breast cancer in the Chinese population.

Authors:  Xin Huang; Xiu-Yu Cai; Jia-Qi Liu; Wen-Wen Hao; Yi-Dong Zhou; Xiang Wang; Ying Xu; Chang Chen; Yan Lin; Chang-Jun Wang; Yu Song; Qiang Sun
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2020-06

3.  Oncoplastic Level II Surgical Techniques for Breast Cancer Treatment: Long-Term Outcomes.

Authors:  Mehmet Ali Gulcelik; Lutfi Dogan; Niyazi Karaman; Melike Bahcecitapar; Cihangir Ozaslan
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Role of Repeat Breast-Conserving Surgery for the Management of Ipsilateral Breast Cancer Recurrence.

Authors:  Clare Josephine Tollan; Eirini Pantiora; Antonios Valachis; Andreas Karakatsanis; Marios Konstantinos Tasoulis
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 4.339

5.  Salvage Mastectomy Is not the Treatment of Choice for Aggressive Subtypes of Ipsilateral Breast Cancer Recurrence: A Single-Institution Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Damiano Gentile; Andrea Sagona; Ruggero Spoto; Davide Franceschini; Stefano Vaccari; Valeriano Vinci; Ersilia Biondi; Lorenzo Scardina; Corrado Tinterri
Journal:  Eur J Breast Health       Date:  2022-10-01

Review 6.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging after Breast Oncoplastic Surgery: An Update.

Authors:  Silvia Gigli; Maria I Amabile; Francesca Di Pastena; Lucia Manganaro; Emanuele David; Massimo Monti; Valerio DʼOrazi; Carlo Catalano; Laura Ballesio
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 7.  Surveillance Mammography in Older Patients With Breast Cancer-Can We Ever Stop?: A Review.

Authors:  Rachel A Freedman; Nancy L Keating; Ann H Partridge; Hyman B Muss; Arti Hurria; Eric P Winer
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 31.777

8.  PIK3CA-AKT pathway predominantly acts in developing ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence long after breast-conserving surgery.

Authors:  Hiroshi Nakagomi; Masayuki Inoue; Yosuke Hirotsu; Kenji Amemiya; Hitoshi Mochiduki; Masao Omata
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Pulsed-dose-rate peri-operative brachytherapy as an interstitial boost in organ-sparing treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  Krystyna Serkies; Janusz Jaśkiewicz; Rafał Dziadziuszko; Jacek Jassem
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2016-12-09

10.  Breast conserving surgery versus salvage mastectomy for ipsilateral breast cancer recurrence: a propensity score matching analysis.

Authors:  Damiano Gentile; Andrea Sagona; Erika Barbieri; Lidija Antunovic; Davide Franceschini; Agnese Losurdo; Bethania Fernandes; Corrado Tinterri
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-06-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.