Shirin Bajaj1, Michael A Marchetti2, Cristian Navarrete-Dechent3, Stephen W Dusza2, Kivanc Kose2, Ashfaq A Marghoob2. 1. Dermatology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York2Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois. 2. Dermatology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. 3. Dermatology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York3Department of Dermatology, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Both colors and structures are considered important in the dermoscopic evaluation of skin lesions but their relative significance is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To determine if diagnostic accuracy for common skin lesions differs between gray-scale and color dermoscopic images. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A convenience sample of 40 skin lesions (8 nevi, 8 seborrheic keratoses, 7 basal cell carcinomas, 7 melanomas, 4 hemangiomas, 4 dermatofibromas, 2 squamous cell carcinomas [SCCs]) was selected and shown to attendees of a dermoscopy course (2014 Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center dermoscopy course). Twenty lesions were shown only once, either in gray-scale (n = 10) or color (n = 10) (nonpaired). Twenty lesions were shown twice, once in gray-scale (n = 20) and once in color (n = 20) (paired). Participants provided their diagnosis and confidence level for each of the 60 images. Of the 261 attendees, 158 participated (60.5%) in the study. Most were attending physicians (n = 76 [48.1%]). Most participants were practicing or training in dermatology (n = 144 [91.1%]). The median (interquartile range) experience evaluating skin lesions and using dermoscopy of participants was 6 (13.5) and 2 (4.0) years, respectively. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Diagnostic accuracy and confidence level of participants evaluating gray-scale and color images. Two separate analyses were performed: (1) an unpaired evaluation comparing gray-scale and color images shown either once or for the first time, and (2) a paired evaluation comparing pairs of gray-scale and color images of the same lesion. RESULTS: In univariate analysis of unpaired images, color images were less likely to be diagnosed correctly compared with gray-scale images (odds ratio [OR], 0.8; P < .001). Using gray-scale images as the reference, multivariate analyses of both unpaired and paired images found no association between correct lesion diagnosis and use of color images (OR, 1.0; P = .99, and OR, 1.2; P = .82, respectively). Stratified analysis of paired images using a color by diagnosis interaction term showed that participants were more likely to make a correct diagnosis of SCC and hemangioma in color (P < .001 for both comparisons) and dermatofibroma in gray-scale (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Morphologic characteristics (ie, structures and patterns), not color, provide the primary diagnostic clue in dermoscopy. Use of gray-scale images may improve teaching of dermoscopy to novices by emphasizing the evaluation of morphology.
IMPORTANCE: Both colors and structures are considered important in the dermoscopic evaluation of skin lesions but their relative significance is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To determine if diagnostic accuracy for common skin lesions differs between gray-scale and color dermoscopic images. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A convenience sample of 40 skin lesions (8 nevi, 8 seborrheic keratoses, 7 basal cell carcinomas, 7 melanomas, 4 hemangiomas, 4 dermatofibromas, 2 squamous cell carcinomas [SCCs]) was selected and shown to attendees of a dermoscopy course (2014 Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center dermoscopy course). Twenty lesions were shown only once, either in gray-scale (n = 10) or color (n = 10) (nonpaired). Twenty lesions were shown twice, once in gray-scale (n = 20) and once in color (n = 20) (paired). Participants provided their diagnosis and confidence level for each of the 60 images. Of the 261 attendees, 158 participated (60.5%) in the study. Most were attending physicians (n = 76 [48.1%]). Most participants were practicing or training in dermatology (n = 144 [91.1%]). The median (interquartile range) experience evaluating skin lesions and using dermoscopy of participants was 6 (13.5) and 2 (4.0) years, respectively. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Diagnostic accuracy and confidence level of participants evaluating gray-scale and color images. Two separate analyses were performed: (1) an unpaired evaluation comparing gray-scale and color images shown either once or for the first time, and (2) a paired evaluation comparing pairs of gray-scale and color images of the same lesion. RESULTS: In univariate analysis of unpaired images, color images were less likely to be diagnosed correctly compared with gray-scale images (odds ratio [OR], 0.8; P < .001). Using gray-scale images as the reference, multivariate analyses of both unpaired and paired images found no association between correct lesion diagnosis and use of color images (OR, 1.0; P = .99, and OR, 1.2; P = .82, respectively). Stratified analysis of paired images using a color by diagnosis interaction term showed that participants were more likely to make a correct diagnosis of SCC and hemangioma in color (P < .001 for both comparisons) and dermatofibroma in gray-scale (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Morphologic characteristics (ie, structures and patterns), not color, provide the primary diagnostic clue in dermoscopy. Use of gray-scale images may improve teaching of dermoscopy to novices by emphasizing the evaluation of morphology.
Authors: G Pagnanelli; H P Soyer; G Argenziano; R Talamini; R Barbati; L Bianchi; E Campione; I Carboni; A M Carrozzo; M S Chimenti; I de Simoni; V Falcomatà; I Filipe Neto; F Francesconi; A Ginebri; J Hagman; G C Marulli; F Palamara; A P Vidolin; P Piemonte; R Soda; S Chimenti Journal: Br J Dermatol Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 9.302
Authors: Cristiane Benvenuto-Andrade; Stephen W Dusza; Anna Liza C Agero; Alon Scope; Milind Rajadhyaksha; Allan C Halpern; Ashfaq A Marghoob Journal: Arch Dermatol Date: 2007-03
Authors: F Nachbar; W Stolz; T Merkle; A B Cognetta; T Vogt; M Landthaler; P Bilek; O Braun-Falco; G Plewig Journal: J Am Acad Dermatol Date: 1994-04 Impact factor: 11.527
Authors: Jacqueline Dinnes; Jonathan J Deeks; Naomi Chuchu; Rubeta N Matin; Kai Yuen Wong; Roger Benjamin Aldridge; Alana Durack; Abha Gulati; Sue Ann Chan; Louise Johnston; Susan E Bayliss; Jo Leonardi-Bee; Yemisi Takwoingi; Clare Davenport; Colette O'Sullivan; Hamid Tehrani; Hywel C Williams Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2018-12-04
Authors: Jacqueline Dinnes; Jonathan J Deeks; Naomi Chuchu; Lavinia Ferrante di Ruffano; Rubeta N Matin; David R Thomson; Kai Yuen Wong; Roger Benjamin Aldridge; Rachel Abbott; Monica Fawzy; Susan E Bayliss; Matthew J Grainge; Yemisi Takwoingi; Clare Davenport; Kathie Godfrey; Fiona M Walter; Hywel C Williams Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2018-12-04