Literature DB >> 27007130

Long-term follow-up after "one-shot" CO2 laser stapedotomy: is the functional outcome stable during the years?

Bruno Sergi1, Daniela Lucidi2, Eugenio De Corso2, Gaetano Paludetti2.   

Abstract

The use of "one-shot" CO2 laser technique for a primary small-fenestra stapedotomy is well established, but few papers report the long-term functional results. We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 198 patients, treated for otosclerosis from January 2008 to December 2011, at the Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Catholic University of Rome. Statistical comparison between audiological thresholds obtained 24 h preoperatively, at early (4 weeks) and late postoperative examinations (mean time 45 months), was performed. Comparison of preoperative vs both early and late postoperative ACPTA showed a statistically significant difference (respectively 55 vs 33 and 31 dB; p < 0.001). No statistical difference was observed between preoperative, early and late postoperative BCPTA (respectively 23 vs 23 and 22 dB; p > 0.05). Both early and late postoperative ABG improved significantly compared to the preoperative one (respectively 10 and 9 vs 32 dB; p < 0.001). No statistical difference was found in comparison of early vs late postoperative ACPTA (respectively 33 vs 31 dB; p > 0.05), early vs late postoperative ABG (respectively 10 vs 9 dB; p > 0.05) and early vs late ABG gain (respectively 22 vs 23 dB; p > 0.05). No subjects developed postoperative complications requiring revision surgery or late deterioration of hearing threshold. The analysis of our data suggests that "one-shot" CO2 laser stapedotomy is an effective and safe procedure: it allows a rapid stapedotomy without damages for the inner ear and optimal functional results that remain stable during the years.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Audiological; CO2 laser; Follow-up; Otosclerosis; Stapedotomy

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27007130     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-016-3976-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  25 in total

1.  KTP versus CO2 laser fiber stapedotomy for primary otosclerosis: results of a new comparative series with the otology-neurotology database.

Authors:  Robert Vincent; Arnold J N Bittermann; John Oates; Neil Sperling; Wilko Grolman
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  Audiometric Results after Stapedotomy Operations in Patients with Otosclerosis and Preoperative Small Air-Bone Gaps.

Authors:  Caroline Salmon; Sébastien Barriat; Laurent Demanez; David Magis; Philippe Lefebvre
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 1.854

3.  Impact noise: the importance of level, duration, and repetition rate.

Authors:  D Henderson; M Subramaniam; M A Gratton; S S Saunders
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Technical and clinical aspects of 'one-shot' CO(2) laser stapedotomy.

Authors:  S Jovanovic
Journal:  Adv Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2007

5.  Microdrill, CO2-laser, and piezoelectric stapedotomy: a comparative study.

Authors:  Domenico Cuda; Alessandra Murri; Paolo Mochi; Tommaso Solenghi; Nicoletta Tinelli
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  Effects of continuous-wave laser systems on stapes footplate.

Authors:  S Jovanovic; U Schönfeld; V Prapavat; A Berghaus; R Fischer; H Scherer; G J Müller
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.025

7.  Lasers for otosclerosis: CO2 vs. Argon and KTP-532.

Authors:  S G Lesinski; A Palmer
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  Transient depression of inner ear function after stapedotomy: skeeter versus CO(2) laser technique.

Authors:  T Somers; J P Vercruysse; A Zarowski; M Verstreken; I Schatteman; F E Offeciers
Journal:  Adv Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2007

9.  Can the learning curve in stapes surgery predict future functional outcome?

Authors:  B Sergi; G Paludetti
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 2.124

10.  High-frequency sensorineural hearing loss after stapedectomy.

Authors:  Michele Bauchet St Martin; Elaine N Rubinstein; Barry E Hirsch
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.311

View more
  2 in total

1.  Preferences in stapes surgery among American otological society otologists.

Authors:  Yuan F Liu; Avigeet Gupta; Shaun A Nguyen; Paul R Lambert; Timothy T Jung
Journal:  World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-02-15

2.  Taste impairment after endoscopic stapes surgery: Do anatomic variability of chorda tympani and surgical technique matter? : Post-operative dysgeusia after EStS.

Authors:  Giulia Molinari; Marella Reale; Marco Bonali; Lukas Anschuetz; Daniela Lucidi; Livio Presutti; Matteo Alicandri-Ciufelli
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 2.503

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.