Literature DB >> 27006738

Assessment of a predictive score for pulmonary complications in cancer patients after esophagectomy.

Xue-Zhong Xing1, Yong Gao1, Hai-Jun Wang1, Shi-Ning Qu1, Chu-Lin Huang1, Hao Zhang1, Hao Wang1, Quan-Hui Yang1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Esophagectomy is a very important method for the treatment of resectable esophageal cancer, which carries a high rate of morbidity and mortality. This study was undertaken to assess the predictive score proposed by Ferguson et al for pulmonary complications after esophagectomy for patients with cancer.
METHODS: The data of patients who admitted to the intensive care unit after transthoracic esophagectomy at Cancer Hospital of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College between September 2008 and October 2010 were retrospectively reviewed.
RESULTS: Two hundred and seventeen patients were analyzed and 129 (59.4%) of them had postoperative pulmonary complications. Risk scores varied from 0 to 12 in all patients. The risk scores of patients with postoperative pulmonary complications were higher than those of patients without postoperative pulmonary complications (7.27±2.50 vs. 6.82±2.67; P=0.203). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications as well as in the increase of risk scores (χ (2)=5.477, P=0.242). The area under the curve of predictive score was 0.539±0.040 (95%CI 0.461 to 0.618; P=0.324) in predicting the risk of pulmonary complications in patients after esophagectomy.
CONCLUSION: In this study, the predictive power of the risk score proposed by Ferguson et al was poor in discriminating whether there were postoperative pulmonary complications after esophagectomy for cancer patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Esophagectomy; Predictive; Respiratory insufficiencty

Year:  2016        PMID: 27006738      PMCID: PMC4786498          DOI: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2016.01.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Emerg Med        ISSN: 1920-8642


  23 in total

1.  External validation of the Ferguson pulmonary risk score for predicting major pulmonary complications after oesophagectomy†.

Authors:  J Matthew Reinersman; Mark S Allen; Claude Deschamps; Mark K Ferguson; Francis C Nichols; K Robert Shen; Dennis A Wigle; Stephen D Cassivi
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 4.191

2.  Comparison of two fluid-management strategies in acute lung injury.

Authors:  Herbert P Wiedemann; Arthur P Wheeler; Gordon R Bernard; B Taylor Thompson; Douglas Hayden; Ben deBoisblanc; Alfred F Connors; R Duncan Hite; Andrea L Harabin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-05-21       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of health care-associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care setting.

Authors:  Teresa C Horan; Mary Andrus; Margaret A Dudeck
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.918

4.  Risk factors for pulmonary complications after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Naoya Yoshida; Masayuki Watanabe; Yoshifumi Baba; Shiro Iwagami; Takatsugu Ishimoto; Masaaki Iwatsuki; Yasuo Sakamoto; Yuji Miyamoto; Nobuyuki Ozaki; Hideo Baba
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-04-14       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  Postoperative pulmonary complications are associated with worse short- and long-term outcomes after extended esophagectomy.

Authors:  Shoichi Kinugasa; Mitsuo Tachibana; Hiroshi Yoshimura; Shuhei Ueda; Toshiyuki Fujii; Dipok Kumar Dhar; Takeru Nakamoto; Naofumi Nagasue
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 3.454

6.  Pulmonary complications after esophagectomy.

Authors:  Christopher E Avendano; Patrick A Flume; Gerard A Silvestri; Lydia B King; Carolyn E Reed
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Outcomes of esophagectomy for esophageal achalasia in the United States.

Authors:  Daniela Molena; Benedetto Mungo; Miloslawa Stem; Richard L Feinberg; Anne O Lidor
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Results of esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in elderly patients: age has little influence on outcome and survival.

Authors:  Alberto Ruol; Giuseppe Portale; Giovanni Zaninotto; Matteo Cagol; Francesco Cavallin; Carlo Castoro; Vanna Chiarion Sileni; Rita Alfieri; Sabrina Rampado; Ermanno Ancona
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 5.209

9.  Comparative study of minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in a single cancer center.

Authors:  Juwei Mu; Zuyang Yuan; Baihua Zhang; Ning Li; Fang Lyu; Yousheng Mao; Qi Xue; Shugeng Gao; Jun Zhao; Dali Wang; Zhishan Li; Yushun Gao; Liangze Zhang; Jinfeng Huang; Kang Shao; Feiyue Feng; Liang Zhao; Jian Li; Guiyu Cheng; Kelin Sun; Jie He
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.628

10.  Predictors of major morbidity and mortality after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database risk adjustment model.

Authors:  Cameron D Wright; John C Kucharczuk; Sean M O'Brien; Joshua D Grab; Mark S Allen
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.209

View more
  4 in total

1.  Preventable readmission to intensive care unit in critically ill cancer patients.

Authors:  Hai-Jun Wang; Yong Gao; Shi-Ning Qu; Chu-Lin Huang; Hao Zhang; Hao Wang; Quan-Hui Yang; Xue-Zhong Xing
Journal:  World J Emerg Med       Date:  2018

2.  Prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis after thoracoabdominal esophagectomy does not reduce the risk of pneumonia in the first 30 days: a retrospective before-and-after analysis.

Authors:  Marcel Hochreiter; Maria Uhling; Leila Sisic; Thomas Bruckner; Alexandra Heininger; Andreas Hohn; Katja Ott; Thomas Schmidt; Marc Moritz Berger; Daniel Christoph Richter; Markus Büchler; Markus Alexander Weigand; Cornelius Johannes Busch
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 3.553

3.  Respiratory complications following mini-invasive laparoscopic and thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Experience in 215 patients.

Authors:  Radek Vrba; David Vrána; Čestmír Neoral; Bohuslav Melichar; René Aujeský; Jana Tesarikova; Jan Cincibuch; Jana Zapletalová; Tomáš Jínek; Martin Stašek
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 1.195

4.  Hybrid esophagectomy for oesophageal cancer: long-term results. A single-centre experience.

Authors:  Lucie Hlaváčová; Radek Vrba; Čestmír Neoral; René Aujeský; Martin Stašek; Josef Chudáček; Katherine Vomáčková; David Vrána; Martin Sněhota
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 1.195

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.