Literature DB >> 27006493

Myeloma Cell Dynamics in Response to Treatment Supports a Model of Hierarchical Differentiation and Clonal Evolution.

Min Tang1, Rui Zhao1, Helgi van de Velde2, Jennifer G Tross1,3, Constantine Mitsiades4, Suzanne Viselli5, Rachel Neuwirth2, Dixie-Lee Esseltine2, Kenneth Anderson4, Irene M Ghobrial4, Jesús F San Miguel6, Paul G Richardson4, Michael H Tomasson7, Franziska Michor1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Since the pioneering work of Salmon and Durie, quantitative measures of tumor burden in multiple myeloma have been used to make clinical predictions and model tumor growth. However, such quantitative analyses have not yet been performed on large datasets from trials using modern chemotherapy regimens. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: We analyzed a large set of tumor response data from three randomized controlled trials of bortezomib-based chemotherapy regimens (total sample size n = 1,469 patients) to establish and validate a novel mathematical model of multiple myeloma cell dynamics.
RESULTS: Treatment dynamics in newly diagnosed patients were most consistent with a model postulating two tumor cell subpopulations, "progenitor cells" and "differentiated cells." Differential treatment responses were observed with significant tumoricidal effects on differentiated cells and less clear effects on progenitor cells. We validated this model using a second trial of newly diagnosed patients and a third trial of refractory patients. When applying our model to data of relapsed patients, we found that a hybrid model incorporating both a differentiation hierarchy and clonal evolution best explains the response patterns.
CONCLUSIONS: The clinical data, together with mathematical modeling, suggest that bortezomib-based therapy exerts a selection pressure on myeloma cells that can shape the disease phenotype, thereby generating further inter-patient variability. This model may be a useful tool for improving our understanding of disease biology and the response to chemotherapy regimens. Clin Cancer Res; 22(16); 4206-14. ©2016 AACR. ©2016 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27006493      PMCID: PMC4987182          DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-2793

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  31 in total

Review 1.  Multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Robert A Kyle; S Vincent Rajkumar
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-10-28       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Extended follow-up of a phase 3 trial in relapsed multiple myeloma: final time-to-event results of the APEX trial.

Authors:  Paul G Richardson; Pieter Sonneveld; Michael Schuster; David Irwin; Edward Stadtmauer; Thierry Facon; Jean-Luc Harousseau; Dina Ben-Yehuda; Sagar Lonial; Hartmut Goldschmidt; Donna Reece; Jesus San Miguel; Joan Bladé; Mario Boccadoro; Jamie Cavenagh; Melissa Alsina; S Vincent Rajkumar; Martha Lacy; Andrzej Jakubowiak; William Dalton; Anthony Boral; Dixie-Lee Esseltine; David Schenkein; Kenneth C Anderson
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2007-08-09       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 3.  Multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Antonio Palumbo; Kenneth Anderson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Optimal control analysis in the chemotherapy of IgG multiple myeloma.

Authors:  G W Swan; T L Vincent
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 1.758

5.  International staging system for multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Philip R Greipp; Jesus San Miguel; Brian G M Durie; John J Crowley; Bart Barlogie; Joan Bladé; Mario Boccadoro; J Anthony Child; Herve Avet-Loiseau; Jean-Luc Harousseau; Robert A Kyle; Juan J Lahuerta; Heinz Ludwig; Gareth Morgan; Raymond Powles; Kazuyuki Shimizu; Chaim Shustik; Pieter Sonneveld; Patrizia Tosi; Ingemar Turesson; Jan Westin
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-04-04       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Tumor growth patterns in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  J A Hokanson; B W Brown; J R Thompson; B Drewinko; R Alexanian
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Clonotypic myeloma cells able to xenograft myeloma to nonobese diabetic severe combined immunodeficient mice copurify with CD34 (+) hematopoietic progenitors.

Authors:  Linda M Pilarski; Andrew R Belch
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  Immunoglobulin synthesis and total body tumor cell number in IgG multiple myeloma.

Authors:  S E Salmon; B A Smith
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1970-06       Impact factor: 14.808

9.  The hemopoietic stem cell niche versus the microenvironment of the multiple myeloma-tumor initiating cell.

Authors:  Dov Zipori
Journal:  Cancer Microenviron       Date:  2010-02-05

Review 10.  Cancer stem cells are the cause of drug resistance in multiple myeloma: fact or fiction?

Authors:  Reinaldo Franqui-Machin; Erik B Wendlandt; Siegfried Janz; Fenghuang Zhan; Guido Tricot
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-12-01
View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Cancer Clonal Theory, Immune Escape, and Their Evolving Roles in Cancer Multi-Agent Therapeutics.

Authors:  Jonathan L Messerschmidt; Prianka Bhattacharya; Gerald L Messerschmidt
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2017-08-12       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  Reconstructing tumor evolutionary histories and clone trees in polynomial-time with SubMARine.

Authors:  Linda K Sundermann; Jeff Wintersinger; Gunnar Rätsch; Jens Stoye; Quaid Morris
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 4.475

3.  Identification of precision treatment strategies for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma by functional drug sensitivity testing.

Authors:  Muntasir Mamun Majumder; Raija Silvennoinen; Pekka Anttila; David Tamborero; Samuli Eldfors; Bhagwan Yadav; Riikka Karjalainen; Heikki Kuusanmäki; Juha Lievonen; Alun Parsons; Minna Suvela; Esa Jantunen; Kimmo Porkka; Caroline A Heckman
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-05-05

4.  Hierarchical tissue organization as a general mechanism to limit the accumulation of somatic mutations.

Authors:  Imre Derényi; Gergely J Szöllősi
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Extinction rates in tumour public goods games.

Authors:  Philip Gerlee; Philipp M Altrock
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  Upregulation of FOXM1 leads to diminished drug sensitivity in myeloma.

Authors:  Chunyan Gu; Xuefang Jing; Carol Holman; Ramakrishna Sompallae; Fenghuang Zhan; Guido Tricot; Ye Yang; Siegfried Janz
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  Employment of Artificial Intelligence Based on Routine Laboratory Results for the Early Diagnosis of Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Wei Yan; Hua Shi; Tao He; Jian Chen; Chen Wang; Aijun Liao; Wei Yang; Huihan Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  Early M-Protein Dynamics Predicts Progression-Free Survival in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Yan; Xu Steven Xu; Katja C Weisel; Maria-Victoria Mateos; Pieter Sonneveld; Meletios A Dimopoulos; Saad Zafar Usmani; Nizar J Bahlis; Thomas Puchalski; Jon Ukropec; Kevin Bellew; Qi Ming; Steven Sun; Honghui Zhou
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 4.689

9.  Validation of a Mathematical Model Describing the Dynamics of Chemotherapy for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia In Vivo.

Authors:  Ekaterina Guzev; Suchita Suryakant Jadhav; Eleonora Ela Hezkiy; Michael Y Sherman; Michael A Firer; Svetlana Bunimovich-Mendrazitsky
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 7.666

Review 10.  Prevention Is the Best Treatment: The Case for Understanding the Transition from Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance to Myeloma.

Authors:  Michael H Tomasson; Mahmoud Ali; Vanessa De Oliveira; Qian Xiao; Yogesh Jethava; Fenghuang Zhan; Adam M Fitzsimmons; Melissa L Bates
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 5.923

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.