Literature DB >> 27004639

The test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change of spatial and temporal gait variability during usual over-ground walking for younger and older adults.

Maha Almarwani1, Subashan Perera2, Jessie M VanSwearingen3, Patrick J Sparto3, Jennifer S Brach3.   

Abstract

Gait variability is a marker of gait performance and future mobility status in older adults. Reliability of gait variability has been examined mainly in community dwelling older adults who are likely to fluctuate over time. The purpose of this study was to compare test-retest reliability and determine minimal detectable change (MDC) of spatial and temporal gait variability in younger and older adults. Forty younger (mean age=26.6 ± 6.0 years) and 46 older adults (mean age=78.1 ± 6.2 years) were included in the study. Gait characteristics were measured twice, approximately 1 week apart, using a computerized walkway (GaitMat II). Participants completed 4 passes on the GaitMat II at their self-selected walking speed. Test-retest reliability was calculated using Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs(2,1)), 95% limits of agreement (95% LoA) in conjunction with Bland-Altman plots, relative limits of agreement (LoA%) and standard error of measurement (SEM). The MDC at 90% and 95% level were also calculated. ICCs of gait variability ranged 0.26-0.65 in younger and 0.28-0.74 in older adults. The LoA% and SEM were consistently higher (i.e. less reliable) for all gait variables in older compared to younger adults except SEM for step width. The MDC was consistently larger for all gait variables in older compared to younger adults except step width. ICCs were of limited utility due to restricted ranges in younger adults. Based on absolute reliability measures and MDC, younger had greater test-retest reliability and smaller MDC of spatial and temporal gait variability compared to older adults.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gait; Older; Reliability; Variability; Younger

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 27004639      PMCID: PMC4806559          DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2015.11.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  28 in total

1.  Measures of reliability in sports medicine and science.

Authors:  W G Hopkins
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Step width variability, but not step length variability or step time variability, discriminates gait of healthy young and older adults during treadmill locomotion.

Authors:  Tammy M Owings; Mark D Grabiner
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Challenging gait conditions predict 1-year decline in gait speed in older adults with apparently normal gait.

Authors:  Jennifer S Brach; Subashan Perera; Jessie M VanSwearingen; Elizabeth S Hile; David M Wert; Stephanie A Studenski
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2011-10-14

4.  Reliability and minimal detectable change of gait variables in community-dwelling and hospitalized older fallers.

Authors:  Mélany Hars; François R Herrmann; Andrea Trombetti
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 2.840

Review 5.  Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine.

Authors:  G Atkinson; A M Nevill
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 6.  Gait variability in older adults: a structured review of testing protocol and clinimetric properties.

Authors:  Sue Lord; Tracey Howe; Julia Greenland; Linda Simpson; Lynn Rochester
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 2.840

7.  Increased gait unsteadiness in community-dwelling elderly fallers.

Authors:  J M Hausdorff; H K Edelberg; S L Mitchell; A L Goldberger; J Y Wei
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 3.966

8.  Gait variability and fall risk in community-living older adults: a 1-year prospective study.

Authors:  J M Hausdorff; D A Rios; H K Edelberg
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.966

9.  The validity of the GaitRite and the Functional Ambulation Performance scoring system in the analysis of Parkinson gait.

Authors:  Arthur J Nelson; Dalia Zwick; Susan Brody; Christine Doran; Lori Pulver; Gitty Rooz; Marla Sadownick; Roger Nelson; Jeffrey Rothman
Journal:  NeuroRehabilitation       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.138

10.  The reliability and validity of measures of gait variability in community-dwelling older adults.

Authors:  Jennifer S Brach; Subashan Perera; Stephanie Studenski; Anne B Newman
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.966

View more
  10 in total

1.  Reliability of walking speed in basic and complex conditions in healthy, older community-dwelling individuals.

Authors:  Roberta Forte; Giuseppe De Vito; Colin A G Boreham
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 3.636

2.  Standing and Walking Balance in Patients with Chronic Shoulder Pain: A Case-control Study.

Authors:  Ali M Alshami; Talal A Alrammah
Journal:  Saudi J Med Med Sci       Date:  2021-04-29

3.  Development of a Smart Hallway for Marker-Less Human Foot Tracking and Stride Analysis.

Authors:  Vinod Gutta; Pascal Fallavollita; Natalie Baddour; Edward D Lemaire
Journal:  IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 3.316

4.  Reliability and Minimal Detectable Change Values for Predictions of Knee Forces during Gait and Stair Ascent Derived from the FreeBody Musculoskeletal Model of the Lower Limb.

Authors:  Phil D B Price; Conor Gissane; Daniel J Cleather
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2017-12-08

5.  Exploring cued and non-cued motor imagery interventions in people with multiple sclerosis: a randomised feasibility trial and reliability study.

Authors:  Barbara Seebacher; Raija Kuisma; Angela Glynn; Thomas Berger
Journal:  Arch Physiother       Date:  2018-03-02

6.  Gait analysis with the Kinect v2: normative study with healthy individuals and comprehensive study of its sensitivity, validity, and reliability in individuals with stroke.

Authors:  Jorge Latorre; Carolina Colomer; Mariano Alcañiz; Roberto Llorens
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 4.262

Review 7.  Step width variability as a discriminator of age-related gait changes.

Authors:  Andreas Skiadopoulos; Emily E Moore; Harlan R Sayles; Kendra K Schmid; Nicholas Stergiou
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 4.262

8.  Is a Wearable Sensor-Based Characterisation of Gait Robust Enough to Overcome Differences Between Measurement Protocols? A Multi-Centric Pragmatic Study in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Lorenza Angelini; Ilaria Carpinella; Davide Cattaneo; Maurizio Ferrarin; Elisa Gervasoni; Basil Sharrack; David Paling; Krishnan Padmakumari Sivaraman Nair; Claudia Mazzà
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-21       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  Walking parameters of older adults from a lower back inertial measurement unit, a 6-year longitudinal observational study.

Authors:  Morad Elshehabi; Silvia Del Din; Markus A Hobert; Elke Warmerdam; Ulrike Sünkel; Tanja Schmitz-Hübsch; Lisa Marie Behncke; Sebastian Heinzel; Kathrin Brockmann; Florian G Metzger; Christian Schlenstedt; Lynn Rochester; Clint Hansen; Daniela Berg; Walter Maetzler
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 5.702

10.  Amputee Fall Risk Classification Using Machine Learning and Smartphone Sensor Data from 2-Minute and 6-Minute Walk Tests.

Authors:  Pascale Juneau; Natalie Baddour; Helena Burger; Andrej Bavec; Edward D Lemaire
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 3.576

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.