Literature DB >> 27004423

Clinical safety and effectiveness evaluation of a new antimicrobial wound dressing designed to manage exudate, infection and biofilm.

Daniel G Metcalf1, David Parsons1, Philip G Bowler1.   

Abstract

The objective of this work was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a next-generation antimicrobial wound dressing (NGAD; AQUACEL® Ag+ Extra™ dressing) designed to manage exudate, infection and biofilm. Clinicians were requested to evaluate the NGAD within their standard protocol of care for up to 4 weeks, or as long as deemed clinically appropriate, in challenging wounds that were considered to be impeded by suspected biofilm or infection. Baseline information and post-evaluation dressing safety and effectiveness data were recorded using standardised evaluation forms. This data included wound exudate levels, wound bed appearance including suspected biofilm, wound progression, skin health and dressing usage. A total of 112 wounds from 111 patients were included in the evaluations, with a median duration of 12 months, and biofilm was suspected in over half of all wounds (54%). After the introduction of the NGAD, exudate levels had shifted from predominantly high or moderate to low or moderate levels, while biofilm suspicion fell from 54% to 27% of wounds. Wound bed coverage by tissue type was generally shifted from sloughy or suspected biofilm towards predominantly granulation tissue after the inclusion of the NGAD. Stagnant (65%) and deteriorating wounds (27%) were shifted to improved (65%) or healed wounds (13%), while skin health was also reported to have improved in 63% of wounds. High levels of clinician satisfaction with the dressing effectiveness and change frequency were accompanied by a low number of dressing-related adverse events (n = 3; 2·7%) and other negative observations or comments. This clinical user evaluation supports the growing body of evidence that the anti-biofilm technology in the NGAD results in a safe and effective dressing for the management of a variety of challenging wound types.
© 2016 Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AQUACEL® Ag+ Extra™; Biofilm; Exudate; Infection; Safety

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27004423      PMCID: PMC7949869          DOI: 10.1111/iwj.12590

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Wound J        ISSN: 1742-4801            Impact factor:   3.315


  22 in total

Review 1.  Towards diagnostic guidelines for biofilm-associated infections.

Authors:  Luanne Hall-Stoodley; Paul Stoodley; Sandeep Kathju; Niels Høiby; Claus Moser; J William Costerton; Annette Moter; Thomas Bjarnsholt
Journal:  FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol       Date:  2012-05-02

2.  Multidrug-resistant organisms, wounds and topical antimicrobial protection.

Authors:  Philip G Bowler; Sarah Welsby; Victoria Towers; Rebecca Booth; Andrea Hogarth; Victoria Rowlands; Alexis Joseph; Samantha A Jones
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  Biofilm as the Cause of Non-Healing Wounds.

Authors: 
Journal:  Medsurg Nurs       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr

4.  Comparison of bacteria-retaining ability of absorbent wound dressings.

Authors:  Masahiro Tachi; Shinichi Hirabayashi; Yoshiyuki Yonehara; Yasutoshi Suzuki; Philip Bowler
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 5.  Clinical Biofilms: A Challenging Frontier in Wound Care.

Authors:  Jennifer Hurlow; Kara Couch; Karen Laforet; Laura Bolton; Daniel Metcalf; Phil Bowler
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  A real-life clinical evaluation of a next-generation antimicrobial dressing on acute and chronic wounds.

Authors:  M Walker; D Metcalf; D Parsons; P Bowler
Journal:  J Wound Care       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.072

7.  Molecular diagnostics and personalised medicine in wound care: assessment of outcomes.

Authors:  S E Dowd; R D Wolcott; J Kennedy; C Jones; S B Cox
Journal:  J Wound Care       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.072

8.  Impact of a novel, antimicrobial dressing on in vivo, Pseudomonas aeruginosa wound biofilm: quantitative comparative analysis using a rabbit ear model.

Authors:  Akhil K Seth; Aimei Zhong; Khang T Nguyen; Seok J Hong; Kai P Leung; Robert D Galiano; Thomas A Mustoe
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 3.617

9.  Controlling wound bioburden with a novel silver-containing Hydrofiber dressing.

Authors:  Samantha A Jones; Philip G Bowler; Michael Walker; David Parsons
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.617

10.  Biofilm delays wound healing: A review of the evidence.

Authors:  Daniel G Metcalf; Philip G Bowler
Journal:  Burns Trauma       Date:  2013-06-18
View more
  6 in total

1.  The wound-healing effects of a next-generation anti-biofilm silver Hydrofiber wound dressing on deep partial-thickness wounds using a porcine model.

Authors:  Stephen C Davis; Jie Li; Joel Gil; Jose Valdes; Michael Solis; Alex Higa; Philip Bowler
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Enhanced Performance and Mode of Action of a Novel Antibiofilm Hydrofiber® Wound Dressing.

Authors:  David Parsons; Kate Meredith; Victoria J Rowlands; Darryl Short; Daniel G Metcalf; Philip G Bowler
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-11-20       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 3.  Antimicrobial Silver Nanoparticles for Wound Healing Application: Progress and Future Trends.

Authors:  Federica Paladini; Mauro Pollini
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 3.623

4.  Clinical impact of an anti-biofilm Hydrofiber dressing in hard-to-heal wounds previously managed with traditional antimicrobial products and systemic antibiotics.

Authors:  Daniel G Metcalf; Philip G Bowler
Journal:  Burns Trauma       Date:  2020-03-04

Review 5.  Microbiota of Chronic Diabetic Wounds: Ecology, Impact, and Potential for Innovative Treatment Strategies.

Authors:  Sónia G Pereira; João Moura; Eugénia Carvalho; Nuno Empadinhas
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 6.  Fundamental aspects of the local approach to cutaneous ulcers.

Authors:  Raquel Colenci; Luciana Patricia Fernandes Abbade
Journal:  An Bras Dermatol       Date:  2018 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 1.896

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.