Literature DB >> 27000252

Magnetic resonance imaging biomarkers indicate a central venous hypertension syndrome in patients with symptomatic pineal cysts.

Per Kristian Eide1, Are Hugo Pripp2, Geir A Ringstad3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: While most pineal cysts (PCs) are asymptomatic, some PCs are accompanied with symptoms of variable severity. We suggested that symptom severity in symptomatic patients with non-hydrocephalic PCs relates to venous compression causing central venous hypertension. This study explored whether possible magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) biomarkers of central venous hypertension could differentiate the severity of symptoms in individuals with non-hydrocephalic PCs.
METHODS: The study included all individuals with PCs and MRI available for analysis followed conservatively within the department from 2003 to 2014. Severity of symptoms at follow-up were assessed from a questionnaire. Suggested MRI biomarkers indicative of central venous hypertension were explored, in addition to MRI measures of cyst size, aqueduct stenosis, and tectal compression.
RESULTS: The study included 66 patients. As compared to the 27/66 patients (41%) with "None-Moderate" symptoms at follow-up, the 39/66 patients (59%) with "Much-Severe" symptoms presented with significantly altered indices of central venous hypertension (tectum-splenium-cyst ratio and indices of thalamic and periventricular edema). PC grading based on MRI biomarkers of central venous hypertension differentiated the severity of symptoms.
CONCLUSION: The results indicate an association between severity of symptoms and MRI biomarkers of central venous hypertension in symptomatic individuals with non-hydrocephalic PCs.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Central venous hypertension; Clinical outcome; MRI; Pineal cysts; Symptomatic

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27000252     DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2016.02.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Sci        ISSN: 0022-510X            Impact factor:   3.181


  7 in total

Review 1.  Is surgery for pineal cysts safe and effective? Short review.

Authors:  Martin Májovský; David Netuka; Vladimír Beneš
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  Intrathecal Use of Gadobutrol for Glymphatic MR Imaging: Prospective Safety Study of 100 Patients.

Authors:  C S Edeklev; M Halvorsen; G Løvland; S A S Vatnehol; Ø Gjertsen; B Nedregaard; R Sletteberg; G Ringstad; P K Eide
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Evaluation of pineal cysts with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Erkan Gokce; Murat Beyhan
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2018-07-28

Review 4.  Headache outcomes after surgery for pineal cyst without hydrocephalus: A systematic review.

Authors:  Camille K Milton; Panayiotis E Pelargos; Ian F Dunn
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2020-11-11

Review 5.  Surgical treatment of symptomatic pineal cysts without hydrocephalus-meta-analysis of the published literature.

Authors:  Riccardo Masina; Ali Ansaripour; Vladimír Beneš; Moncef Berhouma; Joham Choque-Velasquez; Per Kristian Eide; Stepan Fedorko; Steffen Fleck; Juha Hernesniemi; Andrzej Koziarski; Martin Májovský; Andrzej Podgorski; Henry Schroeder; Charles Teo; Andreas W Unterberg; Jacky T Yeung; Angelos Kolias; Thomas Santarius
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 2.216

Review 6.  Pineal cysts without hydrocephalus: microsurgical resection via an infratentorial-supracerebellar approach-surgical strategies, complications, and their avoidance.

Authors:  Steffen Fleck; Ahmed El Damaty; Ina Lange; Marc Matthes; Ehab El Rafaee; Sascha Marx; Jörg Baldauf; Henry W S Schroeder
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 2.800

7.  Off-label intrathecal use of gadobutrol: safety study and comparison of administration protocols.

Authors:  Merete Halvorsen; Camilla Sæthre Edeklev; Jorunn Fraser-Green; Grethe Løvland; Svein Are Sirirud Vatnehol; Øivind Gjertsen; Bård Nedregaard; Ruth Sletteberg; Geir Ringstad; Per Kristian Eide
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2020-08-15       Impact factor: 2.804

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.