Literature DB >> 31320462

Intrathecal Use of Gadobutrol for Glymphatic MR Imaging: Prospective Safety Study of 100 Patients.

C S Edeklev1, M Halvorsen1, G Løvland2, S A S Vatnehol2, Ø Gjertsen3, B Nedregaard3, R Sletteberg3, G Ringstad3, P K Eide4,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Intrathecal contrast-enhanced glymphatic MR imaging has shown promise in assessing glymphatic function in patients with dementia. The purpose of this study was to determine the safety profile and feasibility of this new MR imaging technique.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective safety and feasibility study was performed in 100 consecutive patients (58 women and 42 men, 51 ± 19 years of age) undergoing glymphatic MR imaging from September 2015 to August 2018. Short- and long-term serious and nonserious adverse events were registered clinically and by interview after intrathecal administration of 0.5 mL of gadobutrol (1.0 mmol/mL) along with 3 mL of iodixanol (270 mg I/mL). Adverse events are presented as numbers and percentages.
RESULTS: One serious adverse event (anaphylaxis) occurred in a patient with known allergy to iodine-containing contrast agents (1%). The main nonserious adverse events during the first 1-3 days after contrast injection included severe headache (28%) and severe nausea (34%), though the frequency depended heavily on the diagnosis. After 4 weeks, adverse events had resolved.
CONCLUSIONS: Intrathecal administration of gadobutrol in conjunction with iodixanol for glymphatic MR imaging is safe and feasible. We cannot conclude whether short-duration symptoms such as headache and nausea were caused by gadobutrol, iodixanol, the lumbar puncture, or the diagnosis. The safety profile closely resembles that of iodixanol alone.
© 2019 by American Journal of Neuroradiology.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31320462      PMCID: PMC7048483          DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A6136

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  36 in total

1.  Gadolinium Distribution in Cerebrospinal Fluid after Administration of a Gadolinium-based MR Contrast Agent in Humans.

Authors:  Florian Berger; Rahel A Kubik-Huch; Tilo Niemann; Hans Ruedi Schmid; Michael Poetzsch; Johannes M Froehlich; Jürg H Beer; Michael J Thali; Thomas Kraemer
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 2.  Arachnoid cysts: case series and review of the literature.

Authors:  Gustavo Pradilla; George Jallo
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 4.047

3.  Overdosage of intrathecal gadolinium and neurological response.

Authors:  L Li; F Q Gao; B Zhang; B N Luo; Z Y Yang; J Zhao
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.350

4.  Intrathecal gadolinium-enhanced MR cisternography in the evaluation of clinically suspected cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea in humans: early experience.

Authors:  J Randy Jinkins; Mohamed Rudwan; Gaida Krumina; E Turgut Tali
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Brain-wide pathway for waste clearance captured by contrast-enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Iliff; Hedok Lee; Mei Yu; Tian Feng; Jean Logan; Maiken Nedergaard; Helene Benveniste
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 14.808

6.  Intrathecal gadolinium-enhanced MR cisternography in patients with otorhinorrhea: 10-year experience of a tertiary referral center.

Authors:  Sebahat Nacar Dogan; Osman Kizilkilic; Burak Kocak; Cihan Isler; Civan Islak; Naci Kocer
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  Comparison in myelography between iodixanol 270 and 320 mgI/ml and iotrolan 300 mgI/ml: a multicentre, randomised, parallel-group, double-blind, phase III trial.

Authors:  Yvan Palmers; Fritz-Peter Kuhn; Dirk Petersen; Danielle De Greef
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2001-05-09       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  The role of MR myelography with intrathecal gadolinium in localization of spinal CSF leaks in patients with spontaneous intracranial hypotension.

Authors:  J J Akbar; P H Luetmer; K M Schwartz; C H Hunt; F E Diehn; L J Eckel
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  Neurotoxic manifestations of an overdose intrathecal injection of gadopentetate dimeglumine.

Authors:  Kwan-Woong Park; Soo-Bin Im; Bum-Tae Kim; Sun-Chul Hwang; Jong-Sun Park; Won-Han Shin
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 2.153

10.  Penetration and distribution of gadolinium-based contrast agents into the cerebrospinal fluid in healthy rats: a potential pathway of entry into the brain tissue.

Authors:  Gregor Jost; Thomas Frenzel; Jessica Lohrke; Diana Constanze Lenhard; Shinji Naganawa; Hubertus Pietsch
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  20 in total

1.  High-resolution 3D demonstration of regional heterogeneity in the glymphatic system.

Authors:  Xu-Zhong He; Xin Li; Zhen-Hua Li; Jing-Cai Meng; Rui-Ting Mao; Xue-Ke Zhang; Rong-Ting Zhang; Huai-Liang Huang; Qian Gui; Guang-Yin Xu; Lin-Hui Wang
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2022-07-03       Impact factor: 6.960

2.  Population pharmacokinetic modeling of CSF to blood clearance: prospective tracer study of 161 patients under work-up for CSF disorders.

Authors:  Markus Herberg Hovd; Espen Mariussen; Hilde Uggerud; Aslan Lashkarivand; Hege Christensen; Geir Ringstad; Per Kristian Eide
Journal:  Fluids Barriers CNS       Date:  2022-07-01

Review 3.  The meningeal lymphatic vessels and the glymphatic system: Potential therapeutic targets in neurological disorders.

Authors:  Gaowei Li; Yi Cao; Xin Tang; Jianhan Huang; Linjun Cai; Liangxue Zhou
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 6.960

Review 4.  Fluid transport in the brain.

Authors:  Martin Kaag Rasmussen; Humberto Mestre; Maiken Nedergaard
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 37.312

5.  Direction and magnitude of cerebrospinal fluid flow vary substantially across central nervous system diseases.

Authors:  Per Kristian Eide; Lars Magnus Valnes; Erika Kristina Lindstrøm; Kent-Andre Mardal; Geir Ringstad
Journal:  Fluids Barriers CNS       Date:  2021-04-01

6.  Impaired glymphatic function in idiopathic intracranial hypertension.

Authors:  Per Kristian Eide; Are Hugo Pripp; Geir Ringstad; Lars Magnus Valnes
Journal:  Brain Commun       Date:  2021-03-21

7.  Intrathecal Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Cerebrospinal Fluid Dynamics and Glymphatic Enhancement in Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus.

Authors:  Per Kristian Eide; Aslan Lashkarivand; Åsmund Aleksander Hagen-Kersten; Øivind Gjertsen; Bård Nedregaard; Ruth Sletteberg; Grethe Løvland; Svein Are Sirirud Vatnehol; Are Hugo Pripp; Lars Magnus Valnes; Geir Ringstad
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 4.086

Review 8.  Glymphatic Cerebrospinal Fluid and Solute Transport Quantified by MRI and PET Imaging.

Authors:  Helene Benveniste; Hedok Lee; Burhan Ozturk; Xinan Chen; Sunil Koundal; Paul Vaska; Allen Tannenbaum; Nora D Volkow
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 3.708

9.  Clinical application of intrathecal gadobutrol for assessment of cerebrospinal fluid tracer clearance to blood.

Authors:  Per K Eide; Espen Mariussen; Hilde Uggerud; Are H Pripp; Aslan Lashkarivand; Bjørnar Hassel; Hege Christensen; Markus Herberg Hovd; Geir Ringstad
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2021-05-10

Review 10.  Neurofluid Dynamics and the Glymphatic System: A Neuroimaging Perspective.

Authors:  Toshiaki Taoka; Shinji Naganawa
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 3.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.