Literature DB >> 26999817

Improved survival time trends in Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Matthew Koshy1,2, Andrew Fairchild1, Christina H Son2, Usama Mahmood3.   

Abstract

There have been dramatic changes in the staging and treatment of Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) over the past 30 years. We undertook this study to determine if a stage migration had occurred and also examined if treatment associated with later years has improved survival. Patients with stage I-IV HL between 1983 and 2011 were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Multivariable analysis (MVA) was performed using Cox proportional hazards modeling. The study cohort included 35,680 patients. The stage breakdown in 1983 according to A and B symptoms was follows: 18%, 21%, 12%, and 5% for stage IA, IIA, IIIA, and IVA disease, respectively, and 6%, 11%, 12%, and 15% for stage IB, IIB, IIIB, and IVB disease. The stage breakdown in 2011 according to A and B symptoms was follows: 9%, 29%, 10%, and 6% for stage IA, IIA, IIIA, and IVA disease, respectively, and 4%, 16%, 12%, and 13% for stage IB, IIB, IIIB, and IVB disease. The median follow-up for the entire cohort is 6.1 years. On MVA, the HR for mortality of patients diagnosed in 2006 was 0.60 (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.52-0.70) compared to 1983. For stage I and II patients diagnosed in 2006 the HR was 0.62 (95% CI: 0.44-0.87) and 0.40 (95% CI: 0.30-0.55), respectively, compared to patients diagnosed in 1983. For stage III and IV patients diagnosed in 2006 the HR was 0.72 (95% CI: 0.53-0.98) and 0.74 (95% CI: 0.56-0.99), respectively, compared to patients diagnosed in 1983. This is the first study to demonstrate a significant stage migration in early stage Hodgkin's lymphoma. Furthermore, these results demonstrate an improvement in survival over time for patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma which was particularly notable for those with early stage disease.
© 2016 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lymphoma; stage migration; time trends

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26999817      PMCID: PMC4924356          DOI: 10.1002/cam4.655

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Med        ISSN: 2045-7634            Impact factor:   4.452


Introduction

Over the last 75 years, advancements in the treatment of Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) has changed its prognosis from being relatively incurable to one in which patients have a high likelihood of long‐term survival 1, 2. Refinements in the use of chemotherapy and radiation therapy has resulted in improved survival outcomes for patients with early‐ and late‐stage disease 3, 4, 5. There have also been major advancements in the staging of HL. In 1980s lymphangiography and staging laparotomies were routinely performed to assess disease burden. These procedures have large been replaced due to advances in imaging techniques include widespread use of CT and PET scans to help guide treatment decisions 6. With the utilization of any new staging technique it is important to assess whether it causes an increase in patients who are upstaged or down‐staged compared to previously diagnosed patients. This presence of a “stage migration” in patients with HD has not been previously studied on a population wide level. Also as improvements in survival was seen in the treatment of HL, concerns began to center around the long‐term toxicities of chemotherapy and radiation therapy 7, 8, 9. Recent trials have focused efforts on de‐intensifying treatment with chemotherapy and radiation therapy in order to mitigate the long‐term consequences from these treatments including the incidence of cardiopulmonary toxicities and the incidence of second malignances 10, 11. However, there are concerns that newer treatment paradigms which have de‐intensified treatments have resulted in worse survival outcomes on a population wide level 12, 13. We undertook this study with two objectives, first to examine if changes in staging techniques associated with later years of diagnoses had resulted in a significant stage migration compared to patients diagnosed in an earlier time period. Furthermore, we sought to determine whether being diagnosed in a more recent year was associated with a survival improvement compared to patients treated in an earlier time period.

Methods and Materials

All data are derived from the 1983–2013 database of the SEER Program of the United States National Cancer Institute, which includes data from 18 cancer registries (SEER‐18). The registry covers 26% of the US population. It contains information such as primary tumor site, age at diagnosis, gender, histologic type, stage, radiation status, B symptoms, and follow‐up. Information regarding local control, performance status, and specific radiation therapy technique (dose, fractionation, beam energy) is not available in the database. Furthermore, information on the receipt of chemotherapy is not listed in the database. The last potential date of diagnosis in our cohort was 2011. Patients with any other type of cancer prior to their HL diagnosis were excluded. Overall survival was the primary endpoint of our analysis, defined as the interval from the diagnosis to death from any cause. Cause‐specific death was not analyzed in this cohort because prior data has shown that the cause‐specific survival may be inaccurate in patients with localized disease or in those who develop secondary malignancies which is a known long‐term risk factor in patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma 14. We included all patients with classical HL, stages I‐IV diagnosed from 1983 to 2011 and this resulted in 35,680 cases for analysis.

Statistical analysis

Candidate variables included race, sex, age, histology, stage, and presence of B symptoms and year of diagnosis. All clinically relevant variables that are coded in the database were used in the analysis. The estimates of overall survival (OS) were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method. The log–rank test was used to estimate whether differences were present in OS among these patients. All statistical tests were two‐sided and done at the 0.05 significance level. All the candidate variables mentioned above were included as covariates in the multivariate analysis. Hazard ratios and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals were constructed in models adjusted for all listed covariates of interest. The data were analyzed using Statistical Analysis Systems, version 9.3 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).

Results

The study cohort included 35,680 patients. Table 1 lists the characteristics of our study population. The stage breakdown in 1983 according to A and B symptoms was follows: 18%, 21%, 12%, and 5% for stage IA, IIA, IIIA, and IVA disease, respectively, and 6%, 11%, 12%, and 15% for stage IB, IIB, IIIB, and IVB disease. The stage breakdown in 2011 according to A and B symptoms was follows: 9%, 29%, 10%, and 6% for stage IA, IIA, IIIA, and IVA disease, respectively, and 4%, 16%, 12%, and 13% for stage IB, IIB, IIIB, and IVB disease. An illustration of the changes in the ratio of stage I‐IV over time from 1983 to 2011 is shown in Figure 1.
Table 1

Patient and tumor characteristics

Characteristic (total population, n = 35,680)Percentage (%)
Race
White84.8
Black10.3
Other4.9
Sex
Male54.1
Female45.9
Lymphoma subtype
Nodular sclerosis63.7
Mixed cellularity15.4
Lymphocyte rich3.4
Classical Hodgkins NOS15.9
Lymphocyte depleted1.7
Ann arbor staging
I20.1
II40.8
III20.5
IV18.6
B symptoms
Yes37.3
No41.9
Unknown20.8
Age
≤ 3041.4
> 3058.6
Figure 1

Stage Migration for Hodgkin's lymphoma from 1983 to 2011.

Patient and tumor characteristics Stage Migration for Hodgkin's lymphoma from 1983 to 2011. The median follow‐up for the entire cohort is 6.1 years with an interquartile range of 2.3 years to 11.6 years. Five‐year OS (95% Confidence Interval (CI)) for the entire cohort continually improved through the years and was 73% (78.5–69.5%) versus 82% (84–80%) in 1983 versus 2006 (P < 0.0001), respectively. The changes in 5‐year OS of stages I‐IV from 1983 to 2006 is shown in Figure 2, A–D. For the years 1983 and 2006 the 5‐year OS (Number at Risk – NAR) for stage I changed from 80.1% (129) to 84.5% (284); stage II changed from 80.1% (156) to 90.8% (713); stage III changed from 74.6% (106) to 76.2% (299); and stage IV changed from 56.3% (56) to 67.7% (112).
Figure 2

5 year Kaplan–Meier estimates of overall survival for stage I–IV patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma stratified by year of diagnosis.

5 year Kaplan–Meier estimates of overall survival for stage I–IV patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma stratified by year of diagnosis. Similarly, 15‐year OS for the cohort continually improved and was 58% versus 66% in 1983 versus 1996 (P < 0.0001). For the years 1983 and 2006 the 15‐year OS for stage I changed from 62.3% (NAR–96) to 67.2% (135); stage II changed from 64.1% (123) to 75.7% (240); stage III changed from 57.7% (82) to 58.0% (88); and stage IV changed from 45.2% (55) to 48.5% (62). The relative 5 and 15‐year survival was calculated and was similar to the Kaplan–Meier calculated survival results. The 5‐year relative survival for the cohort in 1983 and 2006 was 77% (95% CI: 73–80%) versus 85.2% (95% CI: 83–87%). The 15‐year relative survival for the cohort in 1983 and 1996 was 63% (95% CI: 59–67%) versus 72% (95% CI: 69–76%). The multivariate analysis of survival for all Hodgkin's lymphoma patients is shown in Table 2 and the corresponding forest plot from the model demonstrating improved survival with later years of diagnosis is shown in Figure 3. On MVA, in patients with a minimum of 5 years of follow‐up, the HR for mortality of patients diagnosed in 2006 was 0.60 (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.52–0.70) compared to 1983. We performed a sensitivity analysis which included the SEER registry region as a separate variable in the MVA and found it did not significantly affect the hazard ratios of the other covariates in the model and also that no region was associated with a statistically different hazard ratio.
Table 2

Multivariate analysis for overall survival

CovariateHazard Ratio95% Confidence Interval P ‐value
Race
White1.0 (ref)  P < 0.001
Black1.161.08–1.23 
Other1.080.96–1.23 
Sex
Male1.0 (ref)  P < 0.001
Female0.900.86–0.95 
Lymphoma subtype
Nodular sclerosis1.0 (ref)  P < 0.001
Mixed cellularity1.561.48–1.64 
Lymphocyte rich1.231.10–1.38 
Classical Hodgkins NOS1.821.72–1.93 
Lymphocyte depleted2.682.40–2.99 
Ann arbor staging
I1.0 (ref)  P < 0.001
II0.950.89–1.00 
III1.441.35–1.54 
IV1.861.75–1.98 
B symptoms
Yes1.0 (ref)  P < 0.001
No0.670.64–0.70 
Unknown0.900.85–0.94 
Age
≤ 301.0 (ref)  P < 0.001
> 303.613.42–3.82 
Year of diagnosis
19831.0 (ref)  P < 0.001
19840.910.78–1.05 
19850.870.74–1.01 
19861.010.86–1.19 
19870.900.77–1.05 
19880.890.76–1.03 
19890.920.79–1.08 
19900.820.7–0.95 
19910.840.72–0.99 
19920.770.66–0.9 
19930.790.67–0.91 
19940.710.6–0.83 
19950.680.58–0.8 
19960.730.63–0.86 
19970.630.54–0.75 
19980.650.55–0.77 
19990.710.6–0.84 
20000.640.56–0.74 
20010.640.56–0.74 
20020.660.57–0.76 
20030.630.55–0.73 
20040.660.57–0.77 
20050.600.51–0.69 
20060.610.52–0.71 
20070.580.50–0.68 
20080.520.44–0.62 
20090.660.56–0.78 
20100.660.55–0.78 
20110.580.46–0.73 
Figure 3

Multivariate Analysis of Survival for Hodgkin's Lymphoma, Stages I‐IV, with Forest Plot Depicting Adjusted Hazard Ratio (95% Confidence Interval) of Survival Stratified by Year of Diagnosis Compared to 1983 as the referent group.

Multivariate analysis for overall survival Multivariate Analysis of Survival for Hodgkin's Lymphoma, Stages I‐IV, with Forest Plot Depicting Adjusted Hazard Ratio (95% Confidence Interval) of Survival Stratified by Year of Diagnosis Compared to 1983 as the referent group. To further examine survival trends by year and stage, a separate MVA was performed within each stage grouping. The corresponding forest plots from the models demonstrating the HR trends by year of diagnosis are shown in Figure 4. For stage I and II patients diagnosed in 2006 the HR was 0.62 (95% CI: 0.44–0.87) and 0.40 (95% CI: .30–0.55), respectively, compared to patients diagnosed in 1983. For stage III and IV patients diagnosed in 2006 the HR was 0.72 (95% CI: 0.53–0.98) and 0.74 (95% CI: 0.56–0.99), respectively, compared to patients diagnosed in 1983.
Figure 4

Multivariate Analysis of Survival for Hodgkin's Lymphoma, Stratified by Stage, with Forest Plot Depicting Adjusted Hazard Ratio (95% Confidence Interval) of Survival by Year of Diagnosis Compared to 1983 as the referent group.

Multivariate Analysis of Survival for Hodgkin's Lymphoma, Stratified by Stage, with Forest Plot Depicting Adjusted Hazard Ratio (95% Confidence Interval) of Survival by Year of Diagnosis Compared to 1983 as the referent group.

Discussion

Our analysis of the most recent SEER data demonstrates a stage migration with a higher percentage of patients diagnosed with stage II disease. Also, there was a gradual improvement in OS over the time period studied. Early‐stage disease showed marked improvement in both 5‐ and 15‐year OS, whereas advanced stage disease showed improved 5‐year OS without any major difference in long‐term survival improvement. Between 1983 and 2011, our analysis demonstrated a decrease in the diagnosis of Stage I HL (−21%), with an almost equal and opposite increase in Stage II (+21%), whereas the incidence of Stages III and IV disease remained relatively constant. After 1997 the increase in stage II disease stabilized. There have been considerable changes to the staging of Hodgkin's lymphoma which occurred throughout this time which may have contributed to this finding. Initially, staging techniques in the 1960s utilized lymphangiography which was later replaced by the more sensitive staging laparotomy 15. In the 1980s, advancements in imaging techniques utilizing computed tomography came into widespread use. This was later followed by further advancements in imaging technology including gallium scans and finally the widespread use of PET scans which provided a more sensitive assessment of initial disease burden 16, 17, 18, 19, 20. The widespread adoption of radiographic imaging in the mid 1990s may be the reason why there have been no dramatic changes in stage migration since 1997 according to Figure 1. The improvement in survival in stage I‐II disease can partly be attributed to this stage migration, that occurred previous to the mid 1990s, where previously staged I patients with a good prognosis were now reclassified as stage II patients thereby raising the survival in both groups, otherwise known as the “Will Rogers” phenomenon 21. Our study found continued improvements in overall survival over the time period studied, especially in 5‐year overall survival for patients with early‐stage disease. It was encouraging to note that advances in treatment techniques including the utilization of multi‐agent chemotherapy, and smaller radiation fields and doses, and improved salvage therapies have all led to population wide benefits in survival in Hodgkin's lymphoma 22, 23. However, this study did demonstrate very limited improvements in 15‐year overall survival for patients with stage III‐IV disease. This is likely due to long‐term effects of the treatments received and further efforts are needed minimize treatment‐related mortalities and complications. Enrollment of Hodgkin's lymphoma patients in survivorship clinics is paramount to combat the increased treatment related long‐term mortality seen in this population 24, 25, 26. The multivariate analysis revealed a continued reduction in mortality for all stages of Hodgkin's lymphoma from 1983 to 2011. On further subset analysis, it was revealed that the major reduction in mortality was seen in early‐stage patients. One trend that requires further consideration is the worsening trend mortality in patients with stage III disease in later years which saw a continued nonsignificant increase in HR from 0.63 in 2008 to 0.89 in 2011. Further research will be needed to determine if this trend reaches statistical significance in later years and if this finding is related to recent changes in chemotherapy regimens or changes in the utilization of radiation therapy over the time period studied. Also, consistent with previous studies, blacks and males had slightly worse survival outcomes on multivariate analysis 27. This study has the limitations of being a retrospective review. Information regarding radiotherapy specifics like field size, dose, fractionation, or beam energy, as well as chemotherapy‐specific like combination regimen, dose, and cycles, imaging modalities and the use of salvage therapies is not available. Also, the presence of B symptoms was not coded in over 20% of the cohort. Furthermore, other disease features including comorbidities, cause of death, and factors from the Hasenclever international prognostic score such as albumin and hemoglobin levels, and presence of leukocystosis or lymphopenia remain unknown and could have significantly affected the multivariate analysis 28. Also, we included patients diagnosed with Hodgkin's lymphoma in earlier treatment era's where modern immunohistochemistry diagnostic techniques were not in practice. In conclusion, this is the first study to reveal a significant stage migration in early stage Hodgkin disease with a larger proportion now presenting with stage II compared to stage I disease. Furthermore, these results demonstrate a remarkable improvement in mortality for all stages of Hodgkin lymphoma which was particularly significant for those with early stage disease.

Conflicts of Interest

None declared.
  28 in total

1.  Late sequelae of treatment of Hodgkin's disease.

Authors:  V T DeVita
Journal:  Curr Opin Oncol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.645

2.  Ongoing improvement in long-term survival of patients with Hodgkin disease at all ages and recent catch-up of older patients.

Authors:  Hermann Brenner; Adam Gondos; Dianne Pulte
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2007-12-20       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  Omitting radiotherapy in early positron emission tomography-negative stage I/II Hodgkin lymphoma is associated with an increased risk of early relapse: Clinical results of the preplanned interim analysis of the randomized EORTC/LYSA/FIL H10 trial.

Authors:  John M M Raemaekers; Marc P E André; Massimo Federico; Theodore Girinsky; Reman Oumedaly; Ercole Brusamolino; Pauline Brice; Christophe Fermé; Richard van der Maazen; Manuel Gotti; Reda Bouabdallah; Catherine J Sebban; Yolande Lievens; Allessandro Re; Aspasia Stamatoullas; Frank Morschhauser; Pieternella J Lugtenburg; Elisabetta Abruzzese; Pierre Olivier; Rene-Olivier Casasnovas; Gustaaf van Imhoff; Tiana Raveloarivahy; Monica Bellei; Thierry van der Borght; Stephane Bardet; Annibale Versari; Martin Hutchings; Michel Meignan; Catherine Fortpied
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Report on the Third International Workshop on Interim Positron Emission Tomography in Lymphoma held in Menton, France, 26-27 September 2011 and Menton 2011 consensus.

Authors:  Michel Meignan; Andrea Gallamini; Emmanuel Itti; Sally Barrington; Corinne Haioun; Aaron Polliack
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2012-04-23

5.  Long-term solid cancer risk among 5-year survivors of Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Authors:  David C Hodgson; Ethel S Gilbert; Graça M Dores; Sara J Schonfeld; Charles F Lynch; Hans Storm; Per Hall; Froydis Langmark; Eero Pukkala; Michael Andersson; Magnus Kaijser; Heikki Joensuu; Sophie D Fosså; Lois B Travis
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-03-19       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Comparison of positron emission tomography/computed tomography with classical contrast-enhanced computed tomography in the initial staging of Hodgkin lymphoma.

Authors:  Ewa Bednaruk-Młyński; Joanna Pieńkowska; Adam Skórzak; Bogdan Małkowski; Waldemar Kulikowski; Edyta Subocz; Justyna Dzietczenia; Marta Zalewska; Krzysztof Leśniewski-Kmak; Renata Zaucha; Tomasz Wróbel; Jan M Zaucha
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2014-06-27

7.  Contribution of PET imaging to the initial staging and prognosis of patients with Hodgkin's disease.

Authors:  R Munker; J Glass; L K Griffeth; T Sattar; R Zamani; M Heldmann; R Shi; D L Lilien
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 32.976

8.  Cardiovascular disease after Hodgkin lymphoma treatment: 40-year disease risk.

Authors:  Frederika A van Nimwegen; Michael Schaapveld; Cécile P M Janus; Augustinus D G Krol; Eefke J Petersen; John M M Raemaekers; Wouter E M Kok; Berthe M P Aleman; Flora E van Leeuwen
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 21.873

Review 9.  Management of Hodgkin lymphoma.

Authors:  Stephen M Ansell; James O Armitage
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 7.616

10.  Long-term survival after treatment for Hodgkin's disease (1973-2002): improved survival with successive 10-year cohorts.

Authors:  E M Bessell; G Bouliotis; S Armstrong; J Baddeley; A P Haynes; S O'Connor; H Nicholls-Elliott; M Bradley
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  11 in total

1.  Contemporary Outcomes for Advanced-Stage Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma in the U.S.: Analysis of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Database.

Authors:  Guru Subramanian Guru Murthy; Aniko Szabo; Mehdi Hamadani; Timothy S Fenske; Nirav N Shah
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-08-29

Review 2.  Investigational PD-1 inhibitors in HL and NHL and biomarkers for predictors of response and outcome.

Authors:  Andres Chang; Danielle Schlafer; Christopher R Flowers; Pamela B Allen
Journal:  Expert Opin Investig Drugs       Date:  2017-12-24       Impact factor: 6.206

3.  Long-Term Survival Rates of Patients with Stage III-IV Hodgkin Lymphoma According to Age, Sex, Race, and Socioeconomic Status, 1984-2013.

Authors:  Yushi Li; Huanhuan Sun; Yan Yan; Tiantian Sun; Shuncong Wang; Haiqing Ma
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2018-05-08

4.  Dysfunctional endothelial progenitor cells in patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma in complete remission.

Authors:  Maya Wiessman; Dorit Leshem; Moshe Yeshurun; Hagai Yavin; Zaza Iakobishvilli; Pia Raanani; Ran Kornowski; Eli I Lev; Mordehay Vaturi
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 4.452

5.  Association of Treatment Intensity With Survival in Older Patients With Hodgkin Lymphoma.

Authors:  Angie Mae Rodday; Theresa Hahn; Anita J Kumar; Peter K Lindenauer; Jonathan W Friedberg; Andrew M Evens; Susan K Parsons
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-10-01

6.  Improved survival time trends in Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Authors:  Matthew Koshy; Andrew Fairchild; Christina H Son; Usama Mahmood
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 4.452

7.  High frequency of primary refractory disease and low progression-free survival rate of Hodgkin's lymphoma: a decade of experience in a Latin American center.

Authors:  José Carlos Jaime-Pérez; Carmen Magdalena Gamboa-Alonso; José Ramón Padilla-Medina; Raúl Alberto Jiménez-Castillo; Leticia Alejandra Olguín-Ramírez; César Homero Gutiérrez-Aguirre; Olga Graciela Cantú-Rodríguez; David Gómez-Almaguer
Journal:  Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter       Date:  2017-09-14

8.  Long-term follow up of Hodgkin lymphoma.

Authors:  David Perez-Callejo; Lorea Zurutuza; Ana Royuela; Maria Torrente; Beatriz Núñez; Virginia Calvo; Miriam Méndez; Fernando Franco; María Auxiliadora Brenes; Juan Cristobal Sánchez; Mariano Provencio
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-02-03

9.  More frequent use of health care services among distressed compared with nondistressed survivors of lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia: Results from the population-based PROFILES registry.

Authors:  Lindy P J Arts; Simone Oerlemans; Lidwine Tick; Ad Koster; Henk T J Roerdink; Lonneke V van de Poll-Franse
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Treatment for lymphoma and late cardiovascular disease risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chelsea R Stone; Alexis T Mickle; Devon J Boyne; Aliya Mohamed; Doreen M Rabi; Darren R Brenner; Christine M Friedenreich
Journal:  Health Sci Rep       Date:  2019-08-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.