Literature DB >> 26999639

Control of Respiratory Drive and Effort in Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Patients Recovering from Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Tommaso Mauri1, Giacomo Grasselli, Grazia Suriano, Nilde Eronia, Savino Spadaro, Cecilia Turrini, Nicolo' Patroniti, Giacomo Bellani, Antonio Pesenti.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The amount of extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal may influence respiratory drive in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). The authors evaluated the effects of different levels of extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal in patients recovering from severe ARDS undergoing pressure support ventilation (PSV) and neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA).
METHODS: The authors conducted a prospective, randomized, crossover study on eight spontaneously breathing ARDS patients undergoing venovenous ECMO since 28 ± 20 days. To modulate carbon dioxide extraction, ECMO gas flow (GF) was decreased from baseline resting protective conditions (i.e., GF100%, set to obtain pressure generated in the first 100 ms of inspiration against an occluded airway less than 2 cm H2O, respiratory rate less than or equal to 25 bpm, tidal volume less than 6 ml/kg, and peak airway pressure less than 25 cm H2O) to GF50%-GF25%-GF0% during both PSV and NAVA (random order for ventilation mode). Continuous recordings of airway pressure and flow and esophageal pressure were obtained and analyzed during all study phases.
RESULTS: At higher levels of extracorporeal carbon dioxide extraction, pressure generated in the first 100 ms of inspiration against an occluded airway decreased from 2.8 ± 2.7 cm H2O (PSV, GF0%) and 3.0 ± 2.1 cm H2O (NAVA, GF0%) to 0.9 ± 0.5 cm H2O (PSV, GF100%) and 1.0 ± 0.8 cm H2O (NAVA, GF100%; P < 0.001) and patients' inspiratory muscle pressure passed from 8.5 ± 6.3 and 6.5 ± 5.5 cm H2O to 4.5 ± 3.1 and 4.2 ± 3.7 cm H2O (P < 0.001). In time, decreased inspiratory drive and effort determined by higher carbon dioxide extraction led to reduction of tidal volume from 6.6 ± 0.9 and 7.5 ± 1.2 ml/kg to 4.9 ± 0.8 and 5.3 ± 1.3 ml/kg (P < 0.001) and of peak airway pressure from 21 ± 3 and 25 ± 4 cm H2O to 21 ± 3 and 21 ± 5 cm H2O (P < 0.001). Finally, transpulmonary pressure linearly decreased when the amount of carbon dioxide extracted by ECMO increased (R = 0.823, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients recovering from ARDS undergoing ECMO, the amount of carbon dioxide removed by the artificial lung may influence spontaneous breathing. The effects of carbon dioxide removal on spontaneous breathing during the earlier acute phases of ARDS remain to be elucidated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26999639     DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  21 in total

Review 1.  Hypothesis: Fever control, a niche for alpha-2 agonists in the setting of septic shock and severe acute respiratory distress syndrome?

Authors:  F Petitjeans; S Leroy; C Pichot; A Geloen; M Ghignone; L Quintin
Journal:  Temperature (Austin)       Date:  2018-05-22

Review 2.  Building on the Shoulders of Giants: Is the use of Early Spontaneous Ventilation in the Setting of Severe Diffuse Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Actually Heretical?

Authors:  Fabrice Petitjeans; Cyrille Pichot; Marco Ghignone; Luc Quintin
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2018-09-01

3.  Extremely high transpulmonary pressure in a spontaneously breathing patient with early severe ARDS on ECMO.

Authors:  Tommaso Mauri; Thomas Langer; Alberto Zanella; Giacomo Grasselli; Antonio Pesenti
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 4.  Spontaneous breathing: a double-edged sword to handle with care.

Authors:  Tommaso Mauri; Barbara Cambiaghi; Elena Spinelli; Thomas Langer; Giacomo Grasselli
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-07

Review 5.  Ventilation during extracorporeal support : Why and how.

Authors:  A Pesenti; E Carlesso; T Langer; T Mauri
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 0.840

6.  The airway occlusion pressure (P0.1) to monitor respiratory drive during mechanical ventilation: increasing awareness of a not-so-new problem.

Authors:  Irene Telias; Felipe Damiani; Laurent Brochard
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 7.  Respiratory mechanics in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Vincenzo Russotto; Giacomo Bellani; Giuseppe Foti
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-10

Review 8.  Esophageal and transpulmonary pressure in the clinical setting: meaning, usefulness and perspectives.

Authors:  Tommaso Mauri; Takeshi Yoshida; Giacomo Bellani; Ewan C Goligher; Guillaume Carteaux; Nuttapol Rittayamai; Francesco Mojoli; Davide Chiumello; Lise Piquilloud; Salvatore Grasso; Amal Jubran; Franco Laghi; Sheldon Magder; Antonio Pesenti; Stephen Loring; Luciano Gattinoni; Daniel Talmor; Lluis Blanch; Marcelo Amato; Lu Chen; Laurent Brochard; Jordi Mancebo
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 9.  [Patient self-inflicted lung injury (P-SILI) : From pathophysiology to clinical evaluation with differentiated management].

Authors:  Benjamin Neetz; Thomas Flohr; Felix J F Herth; Michael M Müller
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 0.840

Review 10.  Awake Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Which Clinical Issues Should Be Taken Into Consideration.

Authors:  Xin Yu; Sichao Gu; Min Li; Qingyuan Zhan
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-07-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.