Literature DB >> 26998453

ARTHROSCOPIC TREATMENT OF ACROMIOCLAVICULAR JOINT DISLOCATION BY TIGHT ROPE TECHNIQUE (ARTHREX(®)).

Luis Alfredo GÓmez Vieira1, Adalberto Visco2, Luis Filipe Daneu Fernandes3, Nicolas Gerardo GÓmez Cordero4.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Presenting the arthroscopic treatment by Tight Rope - Arthrex(®) system for acute acromioclavicular dislocation and to evaluate results obtained with this procedure.
METHODS: Between August 2006 and May 2007, 10 shoulders of 10 patients with acute acromioclavicular dislocation were submitted to arthroscopic repair using the Tight Rope - Arthrex(®) system. Minimum follow-up was 12 months, with a mean of 15 months. Age ranged from 26 to 42, mean 34 years. All patients were male. Radiology evaluation was made by trauma series x-ray. The patients were assisted in the first month weekly and after three months after the procedure. Clinical evaluation was based on the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) criteria.
RESULTS: All patients were satisfied after the arthroscopic procedure and the mean UCLA score was 32,5.
CONCLUSION: The arthroscopic treatment by Tight Rope - Arthrex(®) system for acute acromioclavicular dislocation showed to be an efficient technique.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acromioclavicular dislocation/surgery; Arthroscopy/methods

Year:  2015        PMID: 26998453      PMCID: PMC4783600          DOI: 10.1016/S2255-4971(15)30049-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop        ISSN: 2255-4971


INTRODUCTION

Acromioclavicular dislocation (ACD) is one of the most common shoulder injuries seen in general orthopedic practice. The most common trauma mechanism for this type of injury is a fall with direct force in the lateral region of the shoulder with the upper limb in an adducted position. This injury can be classified into six types according to the magnitude of the trauma. Typically, types I and II are treated conservatively, with most patients returning to pre-injury conditions3, 4, 5, 6. Although the treatment of type III injuries is controversial, high-energy injuries (types IV, V, and VI) with more than 100% posterior and/or inferior displacement are treated surgically7, 8, 9, 10. Several surgical techniques have been developed seeking to treat acromioclavicular dislocation9, 10. The Weaver-Dunn technique of transferring the coracoacromial ligament to the intramedullary canal of the distal clavicle has been one of the more commonly used procedures for acute as well as chronic cases. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the results obtained with the Arthrex® TightRope arthroscopic surgical technique in the treatment of acute acromioclavicular dislocation.

METHODS

From August 2006 to May 2007, 10 shoulders of 10 patients who underwent arthroscopic treatment of acute ACD using the Arthrex® TightRope technique were operated and reevaluated. The surgeries were performed by the Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Group at the Bahia Institute of Orthopedics and Traumatology (INSBOT – Instituto Baiano de Ortopedia e Traumatologia) and the Hospital Português da Bahia, and evaluated after approval by the Ethics Committees of those institutions. The follow-up period ranged from 12 to 19 months, with an average of 15 months. The average age was 34 years, ranging from 26 to 42 years. All patients were male (Table 1).
Table 1

Patient data

Patient NumberGenderAgeUCLAPostoperative follow-up (months)
1M36 years3519
2M42 years2912
3M30 years2915
4M26 years3415
5F34 years3519
6M32 years3515
7M28 years3015
8M30 years3417
9M34 years2914
10M33 years3513

UCLA = University of California, Los Angeles – method for evaluating postoperative results.

Pain and deformity were found in all patients in this study (100% of cases) and the “piano key” sign was present in nine patients (types IV and V). All patients were seen in the acute phase of injury and were evaluated by simple radiology (trauma series). With this test, three patients were observed to have a type V ACD, five patients had a type IV ACD, and two patients had a type III ACD. None of the patients were regularly performing physical activity. The period of immobilization in the postoperative period was two weeks in all cases. Patients were then sent to physiotherapy procedures and released for their daily activities. Patients were allowed to return to sports after three months of surgery. Patients were monitored weekly during the first month, monthly in the first three months, and every three months after the fourth month after the arthroscopic procedure. The method chosen for the postoperative clinical evaluation of the patients was based on the UCLA (University of California, Los Angeles) criteria.

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

In all cases, surgery was performed with the patient in the beach-chair position. The arthroscope is introduced through the posterior portal to inspect the shoulder joint. A 1.5-cm incision is made above the clavicle to the level of the coracoid process under direct vision (Figure 1). At this point, a stirrup-type guide is placed under the coracoid process (larger arrow) and over the clavicle through the anterior portal and tunnels (smaller arrows) are created into the clavicle at the clavicular incision and into the coracoid process (Figure 2). A flexible guide wire (larger arrow) is then passed through these tunnels from top to bottom, and is captured through the anterior portal by a grasper (smaller arrow) (Figure 3). The Arthrex® TightRope system, consisting of two metal buttons joined by four segments of the same Arthrex® No. 5 Fiberwire (Figure 4), is attached to the upper end of the flexible guide wire, which is pulled through the anterior portal, passing a subcoracoid metal button (arrows), while another button is adjusted under tension on the clavicle (arrows) after reduction of the acromioclavicular joint (Figures 5 and 6).
Figure 1

Incision over the clavicle

Figure 2

Creating the bone tunnels

Figure 3

Capturing the flexible guide wire

Figure 4

Arthrex® TightRope system

Figures 5 and 6

Passage of the system and fixation of the it after joint reduction

RESULTS

The mean postoperative follow-up period was 15 months, ranging from 12 to 19 months (Table 1). Using the UCLA scale as the method for evaluation, we found good and excellent results in all cases with an average of 32.5 points (Table 1). After one week postoperatively, one of the patients suffered another fall on the operated shoulder, and suffered no damage to the implanted system, with the acromioclavicular joint remaining clinical and radiologically reduced (Figure 7).
Figure 7

Simple X-ray with TightRope® system implanted and acromioclavicular joint reduced

All acutely operated patients were satisfied with the results of arthroscopic surgery (Figures 8 and 9).
Figures 8 and 9

Clinical appearance after TightRope® system implantation with reduced acromioclavicular joint

The degree of range of motion of the glenohumeral joint of all patients returned to the pre-injury range of motion – 135° to 140° of flexion and 90° of abduction – according to information gathered from the patients in comparison to the contralateral side. Patients with UCLA scores of 29 and 30 were due to residual pain at the level of the acromioclavicular joint with some limitation in the range of motion due to this residual pain. However, all reported being satisfied with the final postoperative results when compared with the preoperative clinical picture.

DISCUSSION

The treatment of acromioclavicular dislocation types I and II is managed conservatively with most patients returning to pre-injury conditions3, 4, 5, 6, 7, whereas types IV, V and VI are typically treated surgically8, 9, 10, 11, 12. Although the treatment of type III ACD is controversial, many recommend conservative treatment with the use of a sling without concern for the reduction of the dislocation, while others believe surgery is necessary. We observed better results through subjective clinical evaluation, assessing the range of motion and the muscle strength using a Cybex device when treating these patients surgically, and therefore advocate the latter. Surgical treatment of acromioclavicular dislocation is typically reserved for full displacements. In acute dislocation of the acromioclavicular joint, reconstruction of the coracoclavicular ligaments has also been employed16, 17, 18. Surgical options are numerous; surgeons can choose from dozens of techniques. We currently opted for the Arthrex® TightRope system which seeks to substitute the coracoclavicular ligaments through four Arthrex® No. 5 Fiberwires so that they are supported in tension through supraclavicular and infracoracoid metal buttons, by vision under arthroscopy. To our knowledge, the first reported experience of the use of this arthroscopic technique was published in 2006. The literature confirms the effectiveness of the Arthrex® TightRope system with results similar to ours, which reinforces the effectiveness of the method and thus encourages the application of this minimally invasive procedure19, 20. Veado et al. note that surgery should not be performed in the acute phase if there is excoriation/abrasion at the location or presence of blistering or infected skin in the region of the shoulder girdle. We support this course of action, since even employing a minimally invasive procedure, we believe that not correcting such problems beforehand poses an unnecessary risk that compromises surgery.

CONCLUSION

The application of the Arthrex® TightRope system in the arthroscopic treatment of acromioclavicular dislocation proved to be a less surgically aggressive technique that is efficient in promoting pain relief with deformity correction and restoration of the range of motion within a short time. It is a procedure with low morbidity and is easy to use after the technique is mastered.
  14 in total

1.  Coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction using the lateral half of the conjoined tendon.

Authors:  Sonya M Sloan; Jeffrey E Budoff; John A Hipp; Lyndon Nguyen
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.019

2.  The management of acute acromioclavicular dislocation. A randomised prospective controlled trial.

Authors:  G C Bannister; W A Wallace; P G Stableforth; M A Hutson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1989-11

3.  A biomechanical evaluation of an anatomical coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Augustus D Mazzocca; Stephen A Santangelo; Sean T Johnson; Clifford G Rios; Mark L Dumonski; Robert A Arciero
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2005-11-10       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  Treatment of acromioclavicular injuries, especially complete acromioclavicular separation.

Authors:  J K Weaver; H K Dunn
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1972-09       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  A comparative analysis of operative versus nonoperative treatment of grade III acromioclavicular separations.

Authors:  R D Galpin; R J Hawkins; R W Grainger
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  The evaluation and treatment of the injured acromioclavicular joint in athletes.

Authors:  M J Lemos
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Percutaneous cannulated screw coracoclavicular fixation for acute acromioclavicular dislocations.

Authors:  P M Tsou
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  The conservative treatment of acromioclavicular dislocation. Review after five years.

Authors:  J J Dias; R F Steingold; R A Richardson; B Tesfayohannes; P J Gregg
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1987-11

9.  Conservative or surgical treatment of acromioclavicular dislocation. A prospective, controlled, randomized study.

Authors:  E Larsen; A Bjerg-Nielsen; P Christensen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Repair of the rotator cuff. End-result study of factors influencing reconstruction.

Authors:  H Ellman; G Hanker; M Bayer
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  3 in total

1.  Acromioclavicular joint dislocation: a Dog Bone button fixation alone versus Dog Bone button fixation augmented with acromioclavicular repair-a finite element analysis study.

Authors:  Sermsak Sumanont; Supachoke Nopamassiri; Artit Boonrod; Punyawat Apiwatanakul; Arunnit Boonrod; Chanakarn Phornphutkul
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-03-20

Review 2.  Biologic and synthetic ligament reconstructions achieve better functional scores compared to osteosynthesis in the treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

Authors:  Maristella F Saccomanno; Giuseppe Sircana; Valentina Cardona; Valeria Vismara; Alessandra Scaini; Andrea G Salvi; Stefano Galli; Giacomo Marchi; Giuseppe Milano
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Safety zone for posterosuperior shoulder access: study on cadavers.

Authors:  Miguel Pereira Costa; Sandro Baraldi Moreira; Gustavo Costalonga Drumond; Fernanda de Marchi Bosi Porto; Fabiano Rebouças Ribeiro; Antonio Carlos Tenor
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2016-06-08
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.