Literature DB >> 26997517

Estimands: discussion points from the PSI estimands and sensitivity expert group.

Alan Phillips1, Juan Abellan-Andres2, Andersen Soren3, Frank Bretz4, Chrissie Fletcher5, Lesley France6, Andrew Garrett7, Raymond Harris8, Magnus Kjaer9, Oliver Keene10, David Morgan11,12, Michael O'Kelly13, James Roger14,15.   

Abstract

ICH E9 Statistical Principles for Clinical Trials was issued in 1998. In October 2014, an addendum to ICH E9 was proposed relating to estimands and sensitivity analyses. In preparation for the release of the addendum, Statisticians in the Pharmaceutical Industry held a 1-day expert group meeting in February 2015. Topics debated included definition, development, implementation, education and communication challenges associated with estimands and sensitivity analyses. The topic of estimands is an important and relatively new one in clinical development. A clear message from the meeting was that estimands bridge the gap between study objectives and statistical methods. When defining estimands, an iterative process linking trial objectives, estimands, trial design, statistical and sensitivity analysis needs to be established. Each objective should have at least one distinct estimand, supported by sensitivity analyses. Because clinical trials are multi-faceted and expensive, it is unrealistic to restrict a study to a single objective and associated estimand. The actual set of estimands and sensitivity analyses for a study will depend on the study objectives, the disease setting and the needs of the various stakeholders.
Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ICH E9; estimands; sensitivity analyses

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26997517     DOI: 10.1002/pst.1745

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharm Stat        ISSN: 1539-1604            Impact factor:   1.894


  8 in total

1.  Patient-reported outcomes of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib (CheckMate 214): a randomised, phase 3 trial.

Authors:  David Cella; Viktor Grünwald; Bernard Escudier; Hans J Hammers; Saby George; Paul Nathan; Marc-Oliver Grimm; Brian I Rini; Justin Doan; Cristina Ivanescu; Jean Paty; Sabeen Mekan; Robert J Motzer
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 2.  Essential statistical principles of clinical trials of pain treatments.

Authors:  Robert H Dworkin; Scott R Evans; Omar Mbowe; Michael P McDermott
Journal:  Pain Rep       Date:  2020-12-18

3.  Estimands and missing data in clinical trials of chronic pain treatments: advances in design and analysis.

Authors:  Xueya Cai; Jennifer S Gewandter; Hua He; Dennis C Turk; Robert H Dworkin; Michael P McDermott
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 7.926

4.  DELTA2 guidance on choosing the target difference and undertaking and reporting the sample size calculation for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Jonathan A Cook; Steven A Julious; William Sones; Lisa V Hampson; Catherine Hewitt; Jesse A Berlin; Deborah Ashby; Richard Emsley; Dean A Fergusson; Stephen J Walters; Edward C F Wilson; Graeme MacLennan; Nigel Stallard; Joanne C Rothwell; Martin Bland; Louise Brown; Craig R Ramsay; Andrew Cook; David Armstrong; Doug Altman; Luke D Vale
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2018-11-05

5.  DELTA2 guidance on choosing the target difference and undertaking and reporting the sample size calculation for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Jonathan A Cook; Steven A Julious; William Sones; Lisa V Hampson; Catherine Hewitt; Jesse A Berlin; Deborah Ashby; Richard Emsley; Dean A Fergusson; Stephen J Walters; Edward C F Wilson; Graeme Maclennan; Nigel Stallard; Joanne C Rothwell; Martin Bland; Louise Brown; Craig R Ramsay; Andrew Cook; David Armstrong; Doug Altman; Luke D Vale
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 6.  Estimands: bringing clarity and focus to research questions in clinical trials.

Authors:  Timothy Peter Clark; Brennan C Kahan; Alan Phillips; Ian White; James R Carpenter
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Evaluating how clear the questions being investigated in randomised trials are: systematic review of estimands.

Authors:  Suzie Cro; Brennan C Kahan; Sunita Rehal; Anca Chis Ster; James R Carpenter; Ian R White; Victoria R Cornelius
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2022-08-23

8.  Development process of a consensus-driven CONSORT extension for randomised trials using an adaptive design.

Authors:  Munyaradzi Dimairo; Elizabeth Coates; Philip Pallmann; Susan Todd; Steven A Julious; Thomas Jaki; James Wason; Adrian P Mander; Christopher J Weir; Franz Koenig; Marc K Walton; Katie Biggs; Jon Nicholl; Toshimitsu Hamasaki; Michael A Proschan; John A Scott; Yuki Ando; Daniel Hind; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 8.775

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.