Literature DB >> 26997136

How to best manage time interaction with patients? Community pharmacist workload and service provision analysis.

João Gregório1, Afonso Miguel Cavaco2, Luís Velez Lapão3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Primary health care disease management models are rooted in multidisciplinary participation; however, implementation of services is lagging behind desires and predictions. Barriers like workload and lack of demand have been described. The aim of this research is to observe the workload and work patterns of Portuguese community pharmacists, and relate it with the demand of pharmaceutical services.
METHOD: A time-and-motion observational study was performed to describe community pharmacists' workload in a sample of four pharmacies in the metropolitan Lisbon area. A reference list of activities to be observed was developed by reviewing other studies of community pharmacy work. This study took place during a weekday's 8-h shift, focusing on pharmacists' activities. Data to be collected included the type and duration of the activity, who performed it and where. To estimate the demand of pharmaceutical care services, "thematic-patient scenarios" were developed. These scenarios were based on the defined daily dose and package size of the most consumed medicines in Portugal, combined with data obtained from the four pharmacies' information systems on the day the observational study took place.
RESULTS: Between 67.0% and 81.8% of the registered activities were pharmacist-patient interactions. These interactions summed 158.44 min, with a mean duration of 3.98 min per interaction. On average, participant pharmacies' professionals handled 4.2 prescriptions and 0.9 over-the-counter (OTC) consultations per hour. About one third of the day was spent performing administrative and non-differentiated tasks. About 54.92 min were registered as free time, 50% of which were "micro pauses" with 1 min or less. The most dispensed therapeutic subgroup was antihypertensive drugs, while the dispensation of antidiabetics was characterized by a high number of packages sold per interaction. From the developed scenarios, one can estimate that a chronic patient may visit the pharmacy 4-9 times per year, depending on the condition presented.
CONCLUSION: Workload results are very similar to findings from studies in other countries, which may be an indication of uniformity of community pharmacy practice across countries. The amount of time a pharmacist has at the counter to interact with a patient during a year renders disease management or therapeutic management non-viable. Also, the perception of "lack of time," many times reported as a barrier for service provision, must be called into question, since substantial available time was found. However, to turn this available time into usable time, redesign of work processes and new role definition are necessary. Both better management and new communication channels should be developed to address this gap and increase patient follow-up services. Copyright Â
© 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Community pharmacy; Pharmaceutical services; Pharmacist workload; Pharmacist-patient interaction; Portugal; Service demand

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26997136     DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2016.02.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Social Adm Pharm        ISSN: 1551-7411


  8 in total

Review 1.  Does the Modality Used in Health Coaching Matter? A Systematic Review of Health Coaching Outcomes.

Authors:  Harjit Singh; Gerard A Kennedy; Ieva Stupans
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 2.711

2.  Implementing an online pharmaceutical service using design science research.

Authors:  Luís Velez Lapão; Miguel Mira da Silva; João Gregório
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 2.796

3.  Pharmacist's time spent: Space for Pharmacy-based Interventions and Consultation TimE (SPICE)-an observational time and motion study.

Authors:  Ajay Karia; Richard Norman; Suzanne Robinson; Elin Lehnbom; Tracey-Lea Laba; Iva Durakovic; Christine Balane; Rohina Joshi; Ruth Webster
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Factors associated with medication adherence among people living with COPD: Pharmacists' perspectives.

Authors:  Bimbishar Bhattarai; Ramesh Walpola; Sohil Khan; Amary Mey
Journal:  Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm       Date:  2021-07-16

5.  The Perception of Primary School Teachers Regarding the Pharmacotherapy of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.

Authors:  João Gregório; Raquel Ferreira; Ana Sofia Fernandes
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Pharmacist and patient perspectives on recruitment strategies for randomized controlled trials: a qualitative analysis.

Authors:  Jane M Fletcher; Terry Saunders-Smith; Braden J Manns; Ross Tsuyuki; Brenda R Hemmelgarn; Marcello Tonelli; David J T Campbell
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2020-10-31       Impact factor: 4.615

7.  Knowledge mobilisation: a UK co-creation study to devise strategies to amend lay and practitioner atopic eczema mindlines to improve consultation experiences and self-management practices in primary care.

Authors:  Fiona Cowdell; Taheeya Ahmed; Carron Layfield
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  How do Polish pharmacy staff evaluate own qualifications, competences, relevance, motivation, effectiveness in health promotion?

Authors:  Dorota Raczkiewicz; Beata Sarecka-Hujar; Adrianna Pawełczak-Barszczowska; Iwona Bojar
Journal:  Health Promot Int       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 2.483

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.