BACKGROUND: We recently demonstrated that brain endothelial cells and astrocytes protect cancer cells from chemotherapy through an endothelin-dependent signaling mechanism. Here, we evaluated the efficacy of macitentan, a dual endothelin receptor (ETAR and ETBR) antagonist, in the treatment of experimental breast and lung cancer brain metastases. METHODS: The effect of macitentan on astrocyte- and brain endothelial cell-mediated chemoprotective properties was measured in cytotoxic assays. We compared survival of mice bearing established MDA-MB-231 breast cancer or PC-14 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) brain metastases that were treated with vehicle, macitentan, paclitaxel, or macitentan plus paclitaxel. Cell division, apoptosis, tumor vasculature, and expression of survival-related proteins were assessed by immunofluorescent microscopy. RESULTS: Cancer cells and tumor-associated endothelial cells expressed activated forms of AKT and MAPK in vehicle- and paclitaxel-treated groups in both metastasis models, but these proteins were downregulated in metastases of mice that received macitentan. The survival-related proteins Bcl2L1, Gsta5, and Twist1 that localized to cancer cells and tumor-associated endothelial cells in vehicle- and paclitaxel-treated tumors were suppressed by macitentan. Macitentan or paclitaxel alone had no effect on survival. However, when macitentan was combined with paclitaxel, we noted a significant reduction in cancer cell division and marked apoptosis of both cancer cells and tumor-associated endothelial cells. Moreover, macitentan plus paclitaxel therapy significantly increased overall survival by producing complete responses in 35 of 35 mice harboring brain metastases. CONCLUSIONS: Dual antagonism of ETAR and ETBR signaling sensitizes experimental brain metastases to paclitaxel and may represent a new therapeutic option for patients with brain metastases.
BACKGROUND: We recently demonstrated that brain endothelial cells and astrocytes protect cancer cells from chemotherapy through an endothelin-dependent signaling mechanism. Here, we evaluated the efficacy of macitentan, a dual endothelin receptor (ETAR and ETBR) antagonist, in the treatment of experimental breast and lung cancer brain metastases. METHODS: The effect of macitentan on astrocyte- and brain endothelial cell-mediated chemoprotective properties was measured in cytotoxic assays. We compared survival of mice bearing established MDA-MB-231 breast cancer or PC-14 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) brain metastases that were treated with vehicle, macitentan, paclitaxel, or macitentan plus paclitaxel. Cell division, apoptosis, tumor vasculature, and expression of survival-related proteins were assessed by immunofluorescent microscopy. RESULTS:Cancer cells and tumor-associated endothelial cells expressed activated forms of AKT and MAPK in vehicle- and paclitaxel-treated groups in both metastasis models, but these proteins were downregulated in metastases of mice that received macitentan. The survival-related proteins Bcl2L1, Gsta5, and Twist1 that localized to cancer cells and tumor-associated endothelial cells in vehicle- and paclitaxel-treated tumors were suppressed by macitentan. Macitentan or paclitaxel alone had no effect on survival. However, when macitentan was combined with paclitaxel, we noted a significant reduction in cancer cell division and marked apoptosis of both cancer cells and tumor-associated endothelial cells. Moreover, macitentan plus paclitaxel therapy significantly increased overall survival by producing complete responses in 35 of 35 mice harboring brain metastases. CONCLUSIONS: Dual antagonism of ETAR and ETBR signaling sensitizes experimental brain metastases to paclitaxel and may represent a new therapeutic option for patients with brain metastases.
Authors: M Yanagisawa; H Kurihara; S Kimura; Y Tomobe; M Kobayashi; Y Mitsui; Y Yazaki; K Goto; T Masaki Journal: Nature Date: 1988-03-31 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Pia Wülfing; Raihanatou Diallo; Christian Kersting; Christian Wülfing; Christopher Poremba; Achim Rody; Robert R Greb; Werner Böcker; Ludwig Kiesel Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2003-09-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Pia Wülfing; Christian Kersting; Joke Tio; Rudolph-Josef Fischer; Christian Wülfing; Christopher Poremba; Raihanatou Diallo; Werner Böcker; Ludwig Kiesel Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2004-04-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Robert R Langley; Karen M Ramirez; Rachel Z Tsan; Melissa Van Arsdall; Monique B Nilsson; Isaiah J Fidler Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2003-06-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: P Wülfing; J Tio; C Kersting; B Sonntag; H Buerger; C Wülfing; U Euler; W Boecker; A H Tulusan; L Kiesel Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2004-08-02 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: A J Clayton; S Danson; S Jolly; W D J Ryder; P A Burt; A L Stewart; P M Wilkinson; R S Welch; B Magee; G Wilson; A Howell; A M Wardley Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2004-08-16 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Justine V Cohen; Hussain Tawbi; Kim A Margolin; Ravi Amravadi; Marcus Bosenberg; Priscilla K Brastianos; Veronica L Chiang; John de Groot; Isabella C Glitza; Meenhard Herlyn; Sheri L Holmen; Lucia B Jilaveanu; Andrew Lassman; Stergios Moschos; Michael A Postow; Reena Thomas; John A Tsiouris; Patrick Wen; Richard M White; Timothy Turnham; Michael A Davies; Harriet M Kluger Journal: Pigment Cell Melanoma Res Date: 2016-10-22 Impact factor: 4.693