Literature DB >> 26994830

DNA double-strand breaks and micronuclei in human blood lymphocytes after repeated whole body exposures to 7T Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Mahsa Fatahi1, Annika Reddig2, Björn Friebe3, Roland Hartig2, Thomas J Prihoda4, Jens Ricke3, Dirk Roggenbuck5, Dirk Reinhold2, Oliver Speck6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine the extent of genetic damage, assessed from deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) double-strand breaks (DSBs) and micronuclei (MN) in peripheral blood mononuclear cells obtained from individuals repeatedly exposed to 7T Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study protocol was approved by the local ethics committee. Informed consent was obtained from 22 healthy, non-smoking, non-alcoholic male individuals, who had never undergone radio-/chemo-therapy, scintigraphy, and had not undergone X-ray examination one year prior blood withdrawal. Eleven participants were repeatedly exposed to 7T and 3T MRI while working with/around scanners or frequently participating as 7T and lower field MRI research subjects (mean age 34±7years). The other half was never exposed to 7T or lower field MRI and served as controls (mean age 33±9years). The damage in lymphocytes was assessed using anti-γH2AX immunofluorescence staining of DNA DSBs and by quantification of MN. Isolated cells were further exposed in vitro to 7T MRI either alone or in the presence of the DNA damaging drug etoposide, to determine if there is any additional combined effect. The kinetics of DNA damage repair were examined.
RESULTS: The mean base-level of γH2AX foci/cell and incidence of MN between repeatedly exposed and control group were not significantly different (P=0.618 and P=0.535, respectively). The additional in vitro exposure of cells to 7T MRI had no significant impact on MN frequencies and γH2AX foci at 1, 20 and 72h after exposure.
CONCLUSION: Frequently repeated 7T MRI exposure did not result in a detectable increase in genotoxicity indices and alterations of DNA repair kinetics.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Double strand breaks; Human blood lymphocytes; Micronuclei; Repeated exposure; Ultra-High Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26994830     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.03.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  10 in total

1.  Absence of DNA double-strand breaks in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells after 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging assessed by γH2AX flow cytometry.

Authors:  Martin Fasshauer; Thomas Krüwel; Antonia Zapf; Vera C Stahnke; Margret Rave-Fränk; Wieland Staab; Jan M Sohns; Michael Steinmetz; Christina Unterberg-Buchwald; Andreas Schuster; Christian Ritter; Joachim Lotz
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Toward 20 T magnetic resonance for human brain studies: opportunities for discovery and neuroscience rationale.

Authors:  Thomas F Budinger; Mark D Bird; Lucio Frydman; Joanna R Long; Thomas H Mareci; William D Rooney; Bruce Rosen; John F Schenck; Victor D Schepkin; A Dean Sherry; Daniel K Sodickson; Charles S Springer; Keith R Thulborn; Kamil Uğurbil; Lawrence L Wald
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 3.  Occupational exposure to electromagnetic fields in magnetic resonance environment: an update on regulation, exposure assessment techniques, health risk evaluation, and surveillance.

Authors:  Valentina Hartwig; Giorgio Virgili; F Ederica Mattei; Cristiano Biagini; Stefania Romeo; Olga Zeni; Maria Rosaria Scarfì; Rita Massa; Francesco Campanella; Luigi Landini; Fabriziomaria Gobba; Alberto Modenese; Giulio Giovannetti
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Gadolinium-enhanced cardiac MR exams of human subjects are associated with significant increases in the DNA repair marker 53BP1, but not the damage marker γH2AX.

Authors:  Jennifer S McDonald; Robert J McDonald; Jacob B Ekins; Anthony S Tin; Sylvain Costes; Tamara M Hudson; Dana J Schroeder; Kevin Kallmes; Scott H Kaufmann; Philip M Young; Aiming Lu; Ramanathan Kadirvel; David F Kallmes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Cardiac MR imaging genotoxicity?

Authors:  Mark A Hill
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2018-01-21       Impact factor: 29.983

6.  Assessing Exposures to Magnetic Resonance Imaging's Complex Mixture of Magnetic Fields for In Vivo, In Vitro, and Epidemiologic Studies of Health Effects for Staff and Patients.

Authors:  Jennifer Frankel; Jonna Wilén; Kjell Hansson Mild
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2018-03-12

7.  Non-Ionizing Radiation in Swedish Health Care-Exposure and Safety Aspects.

Authors:  Kjell Hansson Mild; Ronnie Lundström; Jonna Wilén
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  The potential toxic impact of different gadolinium-based contrast agents combined with 7-T MRI on isolated human lymphocytes.

Authors:  Björn Friebe; Frank Godenschweger; Mahsa Fatahi; Oliver Speck; Dirk Roggenbuck; Dirk Reinhold; Annika Reddig
Journal:  Eur Radiol Exp       Date:  2018-11-28

9.  The Effect of Contrast Enhanced Abdominopelvic Magnetic Resonance Imaging on Expression and Methylation Level of ATM and AKT Genes.

Authors:  Amir Hossein Jalali; Hossein Mozdarani; Hossein Ghanaati
Journal:  Cell J       Date:  2021-07-17       Impact factor: 2.479

Review 10.  Cumulative radiation doses from recurrent PET-CT examinations.

Authors:  Makoto Hosono; Mamoru Takenaka; Hajime Monzen; Mikoto Tamura; Masatoshi Kudo; Yasumasa Nishimura
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 3.629

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.