Literature DB >> 26993976

Assessment of Device-Related Thrombus and Associated Clinical Outcomes With the WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device for Embolic Protection in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation (from the PROTECT-AF Trial).

Michael L Main1, Dali Fan2, Vivek Y Reddy3, David R Holmes4, Nicole T Gordon5, Tina R Coggins6, John A House6, Lawrence Liao7, Dawn Rabineau7, George G Latus5, Kenneth C Huber6, Horst Sievert8, Richard F Wright9, Shephal K Doshi9, Pamela S Douglas7.   

Abstract

Left atrial appendage closure with the WATCHMAN device is an alternative to anticoagulation for stroke prevention in selected patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). LA device-related thrombus (DRT) is poorly defined and understood. We aimed to (1) develop consensus echocardiographic diagnostic criteria for DRT; (2) estimate the incidence of DRT; and (3) determine clinical event rates in patients with DRT. In phase 1 (training), a training manual was developed and reviewed by 3 echocardiographers with left atrial appendage closure device experience. All available transesophageal (TEE) studies in the WATCHMAN left atrial appendage system for embolic protection in patients with atrial fibrillation (PROTECT-AF) trial patients with suspected DRT were reviewed in 2 subsequent phases. In phase 2 (primary blind read), each reviewer independently scored each study for DRT, and final echo criteria were developed. Unanimously scored studies were considered adjudicated, whereas all others were reevaluated by all reviewers in phase 3 (group adjudication read). DRT was suspected in 35 of 485 patients by the site investigator, the echocardiography core laboratory, or both; 93 of the individual TEE studies were available for review. In phase 2, 3 readers agreed on 67 (72%) of time points. Based on phases 1 and 2, 5 DRT criteria were developed. In phase 3, studies without agreement in phase 2 were adjudicated using these criteria. Overall, at least 1 TEE was DRT positive in 27 (5.7%) PROTECT-AF patients. Stroke, peripheral embolism, or cardiac/unexplained death occurred in subjects with DRT at a rate of 3.4 per 100 patient-years follow-up. In conclusion, DRT were identified on at least 1 TEE in 27 PROTECT-AF patients, indicating a DRT incidence of 5.7%. Primary efficacy events in patients with DRT occurred at a rate of 3.4 per 100 patient-years follow-up, intermediate in frequency between event rates previously reported for the overall device and warfarin arms in PROTECT-AF.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26993976     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.01.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  16 in total

1.  Five years of keeping a watch on the left atrial appendage-how has the WATCHMAN fared?

Authors:  Mohammad-Ali Jazayeri; Venkat Vuddanda; Valay Parikh; Madhav Lavu; Donita Atkins; Y Madhu Reddy; Jayant Nath; Dhanunjaya R Lakkireddy
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Burn and plug: is it too much for the left atrial appendage?

Authors:  Nicola Tarantino; Jorge Romero; Xiao-Dong Zhang; David Briceño; Luigi Di Biase
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2019-11-16       Impact factor: 1.900

3.  Predictors of thrombus formation after percutaneous left atrial appendage closure using the WATCHMAN device.

Authors:  Hidehiro Kaneko; Michael Neuss; Jens Weissenborn; Christian Butter
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  Long-term outcomes following percutaneous left atrial appendage closure in patients with atrial fibrillation and contraindications to anticoagulation.

Authors:  Ander Regueiro; Ignacio Cruz-Gonzalez; Armando Bethencourt; Luis Nombela-Franco; Jean Champagne; Luis Asmarats; Pilar Jiménez-Quevedo; Tania Rodriguez-Gabella; Juan Carlos Rama-Merchan; Rishi Puri; Gilles O'Hara; Josep Rodés-Cabau
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 1.900

5.  Short-term non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants vs. warfarin in preventing device-related thrombosis after left atrial appendage closure.

Authors:  Yuyi Chen; Yonghua Zhang; Lulu Qu; Weiping Huang; Xi Su; Yanhong Chen
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 6.  The WATCHMAN device and post-implantation anticoagulation management. A review of key studies and the risk of device-related thrombosis.

Authors:  Mohamed Magdi; Sarath Lal Mannumbeth Renjithal; Mahmood Mubasher; Mostafa Reda Mostafa; Yashdeep Lathwal; Pradeeksha Mukuntharaj; Sarah Mohamed; Richard Alweis; Bryan E-Xin Tan; Bipul Baibhav
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2021-12-15

7.  Left atrial enlargement and clinical considerations in patients with or without a residual interatrial shunt after closure of the left atrial appendage with the WATCHMAN™-device.

Authors:  Blerim Luani; Thomas Groscheck; Conrad Genz; Ivan Tanev; Thomas Rauwolf; Joerg Herold; Senad Medunjanin; Alexander Schmeisser; Rüdiger C Braun-Dullaeus
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 2.298

8.  Initial anticoagulation experience with standard-dose rivaroxaban after Watchman left atrial appendage occlusion.

Authors:  Zhi-Chun Gu; Zhi-Qing Qiao; Zi-Yong Hao; Zheng Li; Li-Sheng Jiang; Heng Ge; Ben He; Jun Pu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-02

Review 9.  Left Atrial Appendages Occlusion: Current Status and Prospective.

Authors:  Sharan Prakash Sharma; Peter Park; Dhanunjaya Lakkireddy
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.243

10.  Reoccurrence of Stroke in a Patient With Peri-Device Leak of WATCHMAN Device.

Authors:  Jordan Perkins; Riwaj Bhagat; Matthew Nichols; Jignesh Shah
Journal:  J Investig Med High Impact Case Rep       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.