BACKGROUND: Ischemic stroke is a devastating complication of atrial fibrillation (Afib). Anticoagulation is the gold standard to prevent stroke and systemic embolization. However, many patients have a contraindication to oral anticoagulation. The WATCHMAN device, which closes the left atrial appendage, is non-inferior to warfarin to prevent embolic events in clinical trials. Post-procedural anticoagulation is needed to avoid device-related thrombosis. The use of anticoagulants after WATCHMAN implantation in patients with high bleeding risks has been a source of debate. OBJECTIVE: This article summarizes the current evidence on anticoagulation following the implantation of the WATCHMAN device, focusing on patients who have an absolute contraindication to oral anticoagulation. OBSERVATION: The WATCHMAN device is efficacious and safe in preventing stroke and systemic embolization. Warfarin and aspirin are given for 45 days after implantation. If TEE at 45 days shows minimal residual peri-device flow (≤ 5mm) and no device-related thrombus, warfarin is stopped. This is followed by aspirin and clopidogrel for six months, then aspirin indefinitely. Antithrombotic therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel for six months followed by daily aspirin indefinitely may be feasible for patients with an absolute contraindication to OAC. DOACs are more convenient to use than warfarin, and limited evidence suggests that they are not inferior following implantation of the device. CONCLUSION: Following the WATCHMAN implantation, the most often utilized regimen is warfarin followed by antiplatelet treatment. In cases where there is a high risk of bleeding, antiplatelets alone may be sufficient. More research is needed to tailor the existing antithrombotic regimen to the needs of patients. AJCD
BACKGROUND: Ischemic stroke is a devastating complication of atrial fibrillation (Afib). Anticoagulation is the gold standard to prevent stroke and systemic embolization. However, many patients have a contraindication to oral anticoagulation. The WATCHMAN device, which closes the left atrial appendage, is non-inferior to warfarin to prevent embolic events in clinical trials. Post-procedural anticoagulation is needed to avoid device-related thrombosis. The use of anticoagulants after WATCHMAN implantation in patients with high bleeding risks has been a source of debate. OBJECTIVE: This article summarizes the current evidence on anticoagulation following the implantation of the WATCHMAN device, focusing on patients who have an absolute contraindication to oral anticoagulation. OBSERVATION: The WATCHMAN device is efficacious and safe in preventing stroke and systemic embolization. Warfarin and aspirin are given for 45 days after implantation. If TEE at 45 days shows minimal residual peri-device flow (≤ 5mm) and no device-related thrombus, warfarin is stopped. This is followed by aspirin and clopidogrel for six months, then aspirin indefinitely. Antithrombotic therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel for six months followed by daily aspirin indefinitely may be feasible for patients with an absolute contraindication to OAC. DOACs are more convenient to use than warfarin, and limited evidence suggests that they are not inferior following implantation of the device. CONCLUSION: Following the WATCHMAN implantation, the most often utilized regimen is warfarin followed by antiplatelet treatment. In cases where there is a high risk of bleeding, antiplatelets alone may be sufficient. More research is needed to tailor the existing antithrombotic regimen to the needs of patients. AJCD
Authors: J P Veinot; P J Harrity; F Gentile; B K Khandheria; K R Bailey; J T Eickholt; J B Seward; A J Tajik; W D Edwards Journal: Circulation Date: 1997-11-04 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Joshua A Cohen; E Kevin Heist; Jennifer Galvin; Hang Lee; Matthew Johnson; Michael Fitzsimons; Kathryn Slattery; Brian Ghoshhajra; Rahul Sakhuja; Grace Ha; Margaux Forsch; Linsheng Shi; Jacqueline Danik; Jacob Dal-Bianco; Danita Sanborn; Judy Hung; Jeremy Ruskin; M Edip Gurol; Moussa Mansour Journal: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Date: 2019-09-17 Impact factor: 1.976
Authors: Yoshinari Enomoto; Varuna K Gadiyaram; Carola Gianni; Rodney P Horton; Chintan Trivedi; Sanghamitra Mohanty; Luigi Di Biase; Amin Al-Ahmad; J David Burkhardt; Arvin Narula; Gwen Janczyk; Matthew J Price; Muhammad R Afzal; Moustapha Atoui; Matthew Earnest; Vijay Swarup; Shephal K Doshi; Sarina van der Zee; Rebecca Fisher; Dhanunjaya R Lakkireddy; Douglas N Gibson; Andrea Natale; Vivek Y Reddy Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2016-10-19 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Srinivas R Dukkipati; Saibal Kar; David R Holmes; Shephal K Doshi; Vijendra Swarup; Douglas N Gibson; Brijeshwar Maini; Nicole T Gordon; Michael L Main; Vivek Y Reddy Journal: Circulation Date: 2018-08-28 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Lucas V Boersma; Hueseyin Ince; Stephan Kische; Evgeny Pokushalov; Thomas Schmitz; Boris Schmidt; Tommaso Gori; Felix Meincke; Alexey Vladimir Protopopov; Timothy Betts; David Foley; Horst Sievert; Patrizio Mazzone; Tom De Potter; Elisa Vireca; Kenneth Stein; Martin W Bergmann Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2017-05-31 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Luigi Di Biase; Pasquale Santangeli; Matteo Anselmino; Prasant Mohanty; Ilaria Salvetti; Sebastiano Gili; Rodney Horton; Javier E Sanchez; Rong Bai; Sanghamitra Mohanty; Agnes Pump; Mauricio Cereceda Brantes; G Joseph Gallinghouse; J David Burkhardt; Federico Cesarani; Marco Scaglione; Andrea Natale; Fiorenzo Gaita Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2012-08-07 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Matthew J Price; Vivek Y Reddy; Miguel Valderrábano; Jonathan L Halperin; Douglas N Gibson; Nicole Gordon; Kenneth C Huber; David R Holmes Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2015-11-25 Impact factor: 11.075
Authors: Dhanunjaya Lakkireddy; David Thaler; Christopher R Ellis; Vijendra Swarup; Lars Sondergaard; John Carroll; Michael R Gold; James Hermiller; Hans-Christoph Diener; Boris Schmidt; Lee MacDonald; Moussa Mansour; Brijeshwar Maini; Laura O'Brien; Stephan Windecker Journal: Circulation Date: 2021-08-30 Impact factor: 29.690