Matthew J Worley1, Aimee-Noelle Swanson, Keith G Heinzerling2, Daniel J O Roche3, Steve Shoptaw2. 1. Department of Family Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, 10880 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1800, Los Angeles, CA 90024, United States. Electronic address: mworley@ucsd.edu. 2. Department of Family Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, 10880 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1800, Los Angeles, CA 90024, United States. 3. Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Franz Hall, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite numerous clinical trials no efficacious medications for methamphetamine (MA) have been identified. Neuroinflammation, which has a role in MA-related reward and neurodegeneration, is a novel MA pharmacotherapy target. Ibudilast inhibits activation of microglia and pro-inflammatory cytokines and has reduced MA self-administration in preclinical research. This study examined whether ibudilast would reduce subjective effects of MA in humans. METHODS:Adult, non-treatment seeking, MA-dependent volunteers (N=11) receivedoral placebo, moderate ibudilast (40 mg), and high-dose ibudilast (100mg) via twice-daily dosing for 7 days each in an inpatient setting. Following infusions of saline, MA 15 mg, and MA 30 mg participants rated 12 subjective drug effects on a visual analog scale (VAS). RESULTS: As demonstrated by statistically-significant ibudilast × MA condition interactions (p<.05), ibudilast reduced several MA-related subjective effects including High, Effect (i.e., any drug effect), Good, Stimulated and Like. The ibudilast-related reductions were most pronounced in the MA 30 mg infusions, with ibudilast 100mg significantly reducing Effect (97.5% CI [-12.54, -2.27]), High (97.5% CI [-12.01, -1.65]), and Good (97.5% CI [-11.20, -0.21]), compared to placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Ibudilast appeared to reduce reward-related subjective effects of MA in this early-stage study, possibly due to altering the processes of neuroinflammation involved in MA reward. Given this novel mechanism of action and the absence of an efficacious medication for MA dependence, ibudilast warrants further study to evaluate its clinical efficacy. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Despite numerous clinical trials no efficacious medications for methamphetamine (MA) have been identified. Neuroinflammation, which has a role in MA-related reward and neurodegeneration, is a novel MA pharmacotherapy target. Ibudilast inhibits activation of microglia and pro-inflammatory cytokines and has reduced MA self-administration in preclinical research. This study examined whether ibudilast would reduce subjective effects of MA in humans. METHODS: Adult, non-treatment seeking, MA-dependent volunteers (N=11) received oral placebo, moderate ibudilast (40 mg), and high-dose ibudilast (100mg) via twice-daily dosing for 7 days each in an inpatient setting. Following infusions of saline, MA 15 mg, and MA 30 mg participants rated 12 subjective drug effects on a visual analog scale (VAS). RESULTS: As demonstrated by statistically-significant ibudilast × MA condition interactions (p<.05), ibudilast reduced several MA-related subjective effects including High, Effect (i.e., any drug effect), Good, Stimulated and Like. The ibudilast-related reductions were most pronounced in the MA 30 mg infusions, with ibudilast 100mg significantly reducing Effect (97.5% CI [-12.54, -2.27]), High (97.5% CI [-12.01, -1.65]), and Good (97.5% CI [-11.20, -0.21]), compared to placebo. CONCLUSIONS:Ibudilast appeared to reduce reward-related subjective effects of MA in this early-stage study, possibly due to altering the processes of neuroinflammation involved in MA reward. Given this novel mechanism of action and the absence of an efficacious medication for MA dependence, ibudilast warrants further study to evaluate its clinical efficacy. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
Authors: Yoonsang Cho; Gregg V Crichlow; Jon J Vermeire; Lin Leng; Xin Du; Michael E Hodsdon; Richard Bucala; Michael Cappello; Matt Gross; Federico Gaeta; Kirk Johnson; Elias J Lolis Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2010-06-08 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Peter Freeman; Bendu C Walker; D Robert Harris; Robert Garofalo; Nancy Willard; Jonathan M Ellen Journal: Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med Date: 2011-08
Authors: Richard L Bell; Marcelo F Lopez; Changhai Cui; Mark Egli; Kirk W Johnson; Kelle M Franklin; Howard C Becker Journal: Addict Biol Date: 2013-11-11 Impact factor: 4.280
Authors: Milky Kohno; Jeanne Link; Laura E Dennis; Holly McCready; Marilyn Huckans; William F Hoffman; Jennifer M Loftis Journal: Pharmacol Biochem Behav Date: 2019-01-26 Impact factor: 3.533
Authors: Yuri A Blednov; Adriana J Da Costa; Tamara Tarbox; Olga Ponomareva; Robert O Messing; R Adron Harris Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2018-03-24 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Michael J Li; Marisa S Briones; Keith G Heinzerling; Mariah M Kalmin; Steven J Shoptaw Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2019-11-26 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Ryan K Bachtell; Jermaine D Jones; Keith G Heinzerling; Patrick M Beardsley; Sandra D Comer Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2017-08-31 Impact factor: 4.492