ISSUES: Methamphetamine- or amphetamine-type stimulants are the second most frequently used illicit drug worldwide, second only to cannabis. Behavioural treatments are efficacious, but their impact is limited underscoring the need for other treatment options, notably, pharmacotherapy. APPROACH: A review of randomised controlled trials of pharmacotherapies for methamphetamine- or amphetamine-type stimulants was performed using PubMed and Google Scholar databases. Evidence for efficacy of medications is reported. KEY FINDINGS: Clinical trials have yielded no broadly effective pharmacotherapy. Promising signals have been observed for methylphenidate, naltrexone, bupropion and mirtazapine in subgroups of patients in reducing stimulant use (e.g. patients with less severe dependence at baseline and men who have sex with men), though none has produced an unambiguous, replicable signal of efficacy. IMPLICATIONS: Problems in Phase II trials, including high dropout rates, missing data and a lack of agreement on outcomes, complicate efforts to find a broadly effective pharmacotherapy for amphetamine-type stimulant disorders. Efforts to address these problems include calls for better validation of pharmacological target exposure, receptor binding and functional modulation. As well, there is a need for agreement in using findings from preclinical and early phases of the medication development process for selecting better pharmacotherapy candidates. CONCLUSION: After over 20 years of efforts worldwide to develop a broadly effective medication for dependence on methamphetamine- or amphetamine-type stimulants, no candidate has emerged. This highlights the need for new compounds, consistent and stringent research methods, better integration between preclinical and clinical stages of medication development, and improved collaboration between government, industry and researchers.
ISSUES: Methamphetamine- or amphetamine-type stimulants are the second most frequently used illicit drug worldwide, second only to cannabis. Behavioural treatments are efficacious, but their impact is limited underscoring the need for other treatment options, notably, pharmacotherapy. APPROACH: A review of randomised controlled trials of pharmacotherapies for methamphetamine- or amphetamine-type stimulants was performed using PubMed and Google Scholar databases. Evidence for efficacy of medications is reported. KEY FINDINGS: Clinical trials have yielded no broadly effective pharmacotherapy. Promising signals have been observed for methylphenidate, naltrexone, bupropion and mirtazapine in subgroups of patients in reducing stimulant use (e.g. patients with less severe dependence at baseline and men who have sex with men), though none has produced an unambiguous, replicable signal of efficacy. IMPLICATIONS: Problems in Phase II trials, including high dropout rates, missing data and a lack of agreement on outcomes, complicate efforts to find a broadly effective pharmacotherapy for amphetamine-type stimulant disorders. Efforts to address these problems include calls for better validation of pharmacological target exposure, receptor binding and functional modulation. As well, there is a need for agreement in using findings from preclinical and early phases of the medication development process for selecting better pharmacotherapy candidates. CONCLUSION: After over 20 years of efforts worldwide to develop a broadly effective medication for dependence on methamphetamine- or amphetamine-type stimulants, no candidate has emerged. This highlights the need for new compounds, consistent and stringent research methods, better integration between preclinical and clinical stages of medication development, and improved collaboration between government, industry and researchers.
Authors: Paul Morgan; Piet H Van Der Graaf; John Arrowsmith; Doug E Feltner; Kira S Drummond; Craig D Wegner; Steve D A Street Journal: Drug Discov Today Date: 2011-12-29 Impact factor: 7.851
Authors: Tudor I Oprea; Julie E Bauman; Cristian G Bologa; Tione Buranda; Alexandre Chigaev; Bruce S Edwards; Jonathan W Jarvik; Hattie D Gresham; Mark K Haynes; Brian Hjelle; Robert Hromas; Laurie Hudson; Debra A Mackenzie; Carolyn Y Muller; John C Reed; Peter C Simons; Yelena Smagley; Juan Strouse; Zurab Surviladze; Todd Thompson; Oleg Ursu; Anna Waller; Angela Wandinger-Ness; Stuart S Winter; Yang Wu; Susan M Young; Richard S Larson; Cheryl Willman; Larry A Sklar Journal: Drug Discov Today Ther Strateg Date: 2011
Authors: Bankole A Johnson; Nassima Ait-Daoud; Ahmed M Elkashef; Edwina V Smith; Roberta Kahn; Francis Vocci; Shou-Hua Li; Daniel A Bloch Journal: Int J Neuropsychopharmacol Date: 2007-05-01 Impact factor: 5.176
Authors: Michael D Hambuchen; F Ivy Carroll; Daniela Rüedi-Bettschen; Howard P Hendrickson; Leah J Hennings; Bruce E Blough; Lawrence E Brieaddy; Ramakrishna R Pidaparthi; S Michael Owens Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2015-05-22 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Michael D Hambuchen; Daniela Rüedi-Bettschen; D Keith Williams; Howard Hendrickson; S Michael Owens Journal: Vaccine Date: 2014-09-22 Impact factor: 3.641