Literature DB >> 26993278

Neuroaesthetics: The Cognitive Neuroscience of Aesthetic Experience.

Marcus T Pearce1, Dahlia W Zaidel2, Oshin Vartanian3, Martin Skov4, Helmut Leder5, Anjan Chatterjee6, Marcos Nadal5.   

Abstract

The field of neuroaesthetics has gained in popularity in recent years but also attracted criticism from the perspectives both of the humanities and the sciences. In an effort to consolidate research in the field, we characterize neuroaesthetics as the cognitive neuroscience of aesthetic experience, drawing on long traditions of research in empirical aesthetics on the one hand and cognitive neuroscience on the other. We clarify the aims and scope of the field, identifying relations among neuroscientific investigations of aesthetics, beauty, and art. The approach we advocate takes as its object of study a wide spectrum of aesthetic experiences, resulting from interactions of individuals, sensory stimuli, and context. Drawing on its parent fields, a cognitive neuroscience of aesthetics would investigate the complex cognitive processes and functional networks of brain regions involved in those experiences without placing a value on them. Thus, the cognitive neuroscientific approach may develop in a way that is mutually complementary to approaches in the humanities.
© The Author(s) 2016.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aesthetics; cognitive neuroscience; cognitive science; empirical aesthetics; neuroaesthetics

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26993278     DOI: 10.1177/1745691615621274

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci        ISSN: 1745-6916


  37 in total

1.  TMS over the superior temporal sulcus affects expressivity evaluation of portraits.

Authors:  Chiara Ferrari; Susanna Schiavi; Zaira Cattaneo
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  The pleasure of art as a matter of fact.

Authors:  Marcos Nadal; Martin Skov
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Medial prefrontal cortex involvement in aesthetic appreciation of paintings: a tDCS study.

Authors:  Zaira Cattaneo; Chiara Ferrari; Susanna Schiavi; Ivan Alekseichuk; Andrea Antal; Marcos Nadal
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2019-10-21

4.  The default-mode network represents aesthetic appeal that generalizes across visual domains.

Authors:  Edward A Vessel; Ayse Ilkay Isik; Amy M Belfi; Jonathan L Stahl; G Gabrielle Starr
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Hemispheric asymmetry of liking for representational and abstract paintings.

Authors:  Marcos Nadal; Susanna Schiavi; Zaira Cattaneo
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-10

6.  Beholders' sensorimotor engagement enhances aesthetic rating of pictorial facial expressions of pain.

Authors:  Martina Ardizzi; F Ferroni; F Siri; M A Umiltà; A Cotti; M Calbi; E Fadda; D Freedberg; V Gallese
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-08-03

7.  Individual differences in aesthetic engagement are reflected in resting-state fMRI connectivity: Implications for stress resilience.

Authors:  Paula G Williams; Kimberley T Johnson; Brian J Curtis; Jace B King; Jeffrey S Anderson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-06-17       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 8.  Consumer Behaviour through the Eyes of Neurophysiological Measures: State-of-the-Art and Future Trends.

Authors:  Patrizia Cherubino; Ana C Martinez-Levy; Myriam Caratù; Giulia Cartocci; Gianluca Di Flumeri; Enrica Modica; Dario Rossi; Marco Mancini; Arianna Trettel
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-18

Review 9.  Beyond social learning.

Authors:  Manvir Singh; Alberto Acerbi; Christine A Caldwell; Étienne Danchin; Guillaume Isabel; Lucas Molleman; Thom Scott-Phillips; Monica Tamariz; Pieter van den Berg; Edwin J C van Leeuwen; Maxime Derex
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 6.671

Review 10.  Using mobile brain/body imaging to advance research in arts, health, and related therapeutics.

Authors:  Juliet L King; Francisco J Parada
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 3.698

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.