Paula G Williams1, Kimberley T Johnson2, Brian J Curtis2, Jace B King3, Jeffrey S Anderson4. 1. Department of Psychology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States. Electronic address: paula.williams@psych.utah.edu. 2. Department of Psychology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States. 3. Program in Neuroscience, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States. 4. Program in Neuroscience, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States; Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Individual differences in aesthetic engagement-the propensity to be moved by art, nature, and beauty-are associated with positive health outcomes, as well as stress resilience. The purpose of the current study was to identify potential neural substrate mechanisms underlying individual differences in aesthetic engagement and reported proneness to aesthetic chill. METHODS: Data from the Human Connectome Project (HCP) 1200 Subjects Release were utilized. Resting-state fMRI connectivity was extracted for 361 regions in the brain including cortical, subcortical and cerebellar regions for each participant, using participant-specific segmentation and parcellation of subcortical gray matter nuclei and a network-based statistics analytical approach. The Aesthetic Interests subcluster of the Openness to Experience scale (NEO-Five Factor Inventory; NEO-FFI) was used to characterize individual differences in aesthetic engagement and chill. RESULTS: Participants reporting higher aesthetic engagement, particularly proneness to aesthetic chill responses, exhibited significantly higher connectivity between the default network and sensory and motor cortices, higher connectivity between the ventral default and salience networks, and decreased connectivity between the cerebellum and somatomotor cortex. CONCLUSIONS: Current findings suggest that greater integration of the default mode network, involving processing of internal narrative, with neural representations of sensory perception and salience detection may be a mechanism underlying individual differences in aesthetic engagement. Thus, these individual differences may reflect general integration of environmental perception with internal emotional experience, which in turn may facilitate comfort with novelty, self-regulation, and positive adaptation to potentially stressful experiences.
OBJECTIVE: Individual differences in aesthetic engagement-the propensity to be moved by art, nature, and beauty-are associated with positive health outcomes, as well as stress resilience. The purpose of the current study was to identify potential neural substrate mechanisms underlying individual differences in aesthetic engagement and reported proneness to aesthetic chill. METHODS: Data from the Human Connectome Project (HCP) 1200 Subjects Release were utilized. Resting-state fMRI connectivity was extracted for 361 regions in the brain including cortical, subcortical and cerebellar regions for each participant, using participant-specific segmentation and parcellation of subcortical gray matter nuclei and a network-based statistics analytical approach. The Aesthetic Interests subcluster of the Openness to Experience scale (NEO-Five Factor Inventory; NEO-FFI) was used to characterize individual differences in aesthetic engagement and chill. RESULTS:Participants reporting higher aesthetic engagement, particularly proneness to aesthetic chill responses, exhibited significantly higher connectivity between the default network and sensory and motor cortices, higher connectivity between the ventral default and salience networks, and decreased connectivity between the cerebellum and somatomotor cortex. CONCLUSIONS: Current findings suggest that greater integration of the default mode network, involving processing of internal narrative, with neural representations of sensory perception and salience detection may be a mechanism underlying individual differences in aesthetic engagement. Thus, these individual differences may reflect general integration of environmental perception with internal emotional experience, which in turn may facilitate comfort with novelty, self-regulation, and positive adaptation to potentially stressful experiences.
Authors: A M Clare Kelly; Lucina Q Uddin; Bharat B Biswal; F Xavier Castellanos; Michael P Milham Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2007-08-23 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: L Passamonti; A Terracciano; R Riccelli; G Donzuso; A Cerasa; Mg Vaccaro; F Novellino; F Fera; A Quattrone Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2014-09-16 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Lisa A Kilpatrick; Brandall Y Suyenobu; Suzanne R Smith; Joshua A Bueller; Trudy Goodman; J David Creswell; Kirsten Tillisch; Emeran A Mayer; Bruce D Naliboff Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2011-02-18 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Amanda J Khan; Aarti Nair; Christopher L Keown; Michael C Datko; Alan J Lincoln; Ralph-Axel Müller Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2015-04-01 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Jonathan S Adelstein; Zarrar Shehzad; Maarten Mennes; Colin G Deyoung; Xi-Nian Zuo; Clare Kelly; Daniel S Margulies; Aaron Bloomfield; Jeremy R Gray; F Xavier Castellanos; Michael P Milham Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-11-30 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Fiona L Weathersby; Jace B King; J Chancelor Fox; Amy Loret; Jeffrey S Anderson Journal: Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging Date: 2019-08-02 Impact factor: 2.376
Authors: Federico E Turkheimer; Erik D Fagerholm; Miriam Vignando; Jessica Dafflon; Pedro F Da Costa; Paola Dazzan; Robert Leech Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2020-07-13 Impact factor: 5.435