Literature DB >> 26993174

Rapid diagnostic method for the identification of Mycoplasma pneumoniae respiratory tract infection.

Naoyuki Miyashita1, Yasuhiro Kawai2, Tadashi Kato2, Takaaki Tanaka3, Hiroto Akaike3, Hideto Teranishi3, Takashi Nakano3, Kazunobu Ouchi3, Niro Okimoto2.   

Abstract

Rapid diagnostic tests are useful tools in the early diagnosis of respiratory tract infections (RTIs) caused by a specific pathogens. We investigated the sensitivity and specificity of a rapid and simple antigen test for the detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Ribotest Mycoplasma(®) in adolescent and adult patients with RTIs. In addition, we evaluated the accuracy of clinical and laboratory findings for the early presumptive diagnosis of M. pneumoniae RTI. We compared 55 cases with laboratory-confirmed M. pneumoniae infection using serology, culture, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and 346 cases without laboratory-confirmed M. pneumoniae infection. Pneumonia cases were excluded in this study. Among patients with M. pneumoniae infection, the incidences of cough, sore throat, and sputum production were high, with rates of 98%, 61%, and 67%, respectively, but the specificity was low. The prevalence of nasal symptoms was significantly lower in patients with M. pneumoniae infection (9%) than in non-M. pneumoniae infection (70%; p < 0.0001). When PCR was used as the control test, the sensitivity, specificity, and overall agreement rates with Ribotest(®) were 71%, 89%, and 87%, respectively. Clinical symptoms and laboratory data were of limited value in making the diagnosis of M. pneumoniae RTI in adolescent and adult patients. Our results suggested that Ribotest(®) may be helpful in distinguishing M. pneumoniae RTI patients from those without the disease. Physicians should consider the use of Ribotest(®) when patients have a persistent cough without nasal symptoms.
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical differentiation; Mycoplasama pneumoniae; Rapid and simple test; Respiratory tract infection; Ribotest(®)

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26993174     DOI: 10.1016/j.jiac.2016.02.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Infect Chemother        ISSN: 1341-321X            Impact factor:   2.211


  6 in total

Review 1.  Mycoplasma pneumoniae from the Respiratory Tract and Beyond.

Authors:  Ken B Waites; Li Xiao; Yang Liu; Mitchell F Balish; T Prescott Atkinson
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 2.  Diagnosing Viral and Atypical Pathogens in the Setting of Community-Acquired Pneumonia.

Authors:  Grant W Waterer
Journal:  Clin Chest Med       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 2.878

Review 3.  Which Current and Novel Diagnostic Avenues for Bacterial Respiratory Diseases?

Authors:  Héloïse Rytter; Anne Jamet; Mathieu Coureuil; Alain Charbit; Elodie Ramond
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 4.  Recent Trends in the Epidemiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Macrolide-Resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae.

Authors:  Tomohiro Oishi; Kazunobu Ouchi
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  An atypical case of atypical pneumonia.

Authors:  Koshi Ota; Ryo Iida; Kanna Ota; Masahide Sakaue; Kohei Taniguchi; Masao Tomioka; Masahiko Nitta; Akira Takasu
Journal:  J Gen Fam Med       Date:  2018-06-03

6.  Immunochromatography for the diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Seo Hee Yoon; In Kyung Min; Jong Gyun Ahn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.