Pei-Ying Wu1, Chih-Hung Chang2, Meng-Ru Shen1, Cheng-Yang Chou1, Yi-Ching Yang3, Yu-Fang Huang4. 1. Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, 70403, Taiwan. 2. Department of Urology, St. Joseph Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. 3. Department of Family Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan. 4. Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, 70403, Taiwan. yufangh@mail.ncku.edu.tw.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to explore new preventable risk factors for mesh exposure. METHODS: A retrospective review of 92 consecutive patients treated with transvaginal mesh (TVM) in the urogynecological unit of our university hospital. An analysis of perioperative predictors was conducted in patients after vaginal repairs using a type 1 mesh. Mesh complications were recorded according to International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) definitions. Mesh-exposure-free durations were calculated by using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between different closure techniques using log-rank test. Hazard ratios (HR) of predictors for mesh exposure were estimated by univariate and multivariate analyses using Cox proportional hazards regression models. RESULTS: The median surveillance interval was 24.1 months. Two late occurrences were found beyond 1 year post operation. No statistically significant correlation was observed between mesh exposure and concomitant hysterectomy. Exposure risks were significantly higher in patients with interrupted whole-layer closure in univariate analysis. In the multivariate analysis, hematoma [HR 5.42, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.26-23.35, P = 0.024), Prolift mesh (HR 5.52, 95 % CI 1.15-26.53, P = 0.033), and interrupted whole-layer closure (HR 7.02, 95 % CI 1.62-30.53, P = 0.009) were the strongest predictors of mesh exposure. CONCLUSION: Findings indicate the risks of mesh exposure and reoperation may be prevented by avoiding hematoma, large amount of mesh, or interrupted whole-layer closure in TVM surgeries. If these risk factors are prevented, hysterectomy may not be a relative contraindication for TVM use. We also provide evidence regarding mesh exposure and the necessity for more than 1 year of follow-up and preoperative counselling.
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to explore new preventable risk factors for mesh exposure. METHODS: A retrospective review of 92 consecutive patients treated with transvaginal mesh (TVM) in the urogynecological unit of our university hospital. An analysis of perioperative predictors was conducted in patients after vaginal repairs using a type 1 mesh. Mesh complications were recorded according to International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) definitions. Mesh-exposure-free durations were calculated by using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between different closure techniques using log-rank test. Hazard ratios (HR) of predictors for mesh exposure were estimated by univariate and multivariate analyses using Cox proportional hazards regression models. RESULTS: The median surveillance interval was 24.1 months. Two late occurrences were found beyond 1 year post operation. No statistically significant correlation was observed between mesh exposure and concomitant hysterectomy. Exposure risks were significantly higher in patients with interrupted whole-layer closure in univariate analysis. In the multivariate analysis, hematoma [HR 5.42, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.26-23.35, P = 0.024), Prolift mesh (HR 5.52, 95 % CI 1.15-26.53, P = 0.033), and interrupted whole-layer closure (HR 7.02, 95 % CI 1.62-30.53, P = 0.009) were the strongest predictors of mesh exposure. CONCLUSION: Findings indicate the risks of mesh exposure and reoperation may be prevented by avoiding hematoma, large amount of mesh, or interrupted whole-layer closure in TVM surgeries. If these risk factors are prevented, hysterectomy may not be a relative contraindication for TVM use. We also provide evidence regarding mesh exposure and the necessity for more than 1 year of follow-up and preoperative counselling.
Authors: Paul Abrams; Linda Cardozo; Magnus Fall; Derek Griffiths; Peter Rosier; Ulf Ulmsten; Philip van Kerrebroeck; Arne Victor; Alan Wein Journal: Neurourol Urodyn Date: 2002 Impact factor: 2.696
Authors: Bernard T Haylen; Robert M Freeman; Steven E Swift; Michel Cosson; G Willy Davila; Jan Deprest; Peter L Dwyer; Brigitte Fatton; Ervin Kocjancic; Joseph Lee; Chris Maher; Eckhard Petri; Diaa E Rizk; Peter K Sand; Gabriel N Schaer; Ralph Webb Journal: Neurourol Urodyn Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 2.696
Authors: R C Bump; A Mattiasson; K Bø; L P Brubaker; J O DeLancey; P Klarskov; B L Shull; A R Smith Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 1996-07 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Mariëlla I Withagen; Mark E Vierhout; Jan C Hendriks; Kirsten B Kluivers; Alfredo L Milani Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Mariëlla I Withagen; Alfredo L Milani; Jan den Boon; Harry A Vervest; Mark E Vierhout Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Caroline Elmér; Christian Falconer; Anders Hallin; Gregor Larsson; Marion Ek; Daniel Altman Journal: Neurourol Urodyn Date: 2012-04-19 Impact factor: 2.696
Authors: Cheryl B Iglesia; Andrew I Sokol; Eric R Sokol; Bela I Kudish; Robert E Gutman; Joanna L Peterson; Susan Shott Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Fréderic Caquant; Pierre Collinet; Philippe Debodinance; Juan Berrocal; Olivier Garbin; Claude Rosenthal; Henri Clave; Richard Villet; Bernard Jacquetin; Michel Cosson Journal: J Obstet Gynaecol Res Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 1.730
Authors: Alfredo L Milani; Anne Damoiseaux; Joanna IntHout; Kirsten B Kluivers; Mariella I J Withagen Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2017-11-22 Impact factor: 2.894