Literature DB >> 26992377

Comparison of intraoperative volume and pressure-controlled ventilation modes in patients who undergo open heart surgery.

Tülay Hoşten1, Alparslan Kuş2, Esra Gümüş2, Şadan Yavuz2, Serhat İrkil3, Mine Solak2.   

Abstract

Respiratory problems occur more frequently in patients who undergo open heart surgery. Intraoperative and postoperative ventilation strategies can prevent these complications and reduce mortality. We hypothesized that PCV would have better effects on gas exchange, lung mechanics and hemodynamics compared to VCV in CABG surgery. Our primary outcome was to compare the PaO2/FiO2 ratio. Patients were randomized into two groups, (VCV, PCV) consisting of 30 individuals each. Two patients were excluded from the study. I/E ratio was adjusted to 1:2 and, RR:10/min fresh air gas flow was set at 3L/min in all patients. In the VCV group TV was set at 8 mL/kg of the predicted body weight. In the PCV group, peak inspiratory pressure was adjusted to the same tidal volume with the VCV group. PaO2/FiO2 was found to be higher with PCV at the end of the surgery. Time to extubation and ICU length of stay was shorter with PCV. Ppeak was similar in both groups. Pplateau was lower and Pmean was higher at the and of the surgery with PCV compared to VCV. The hemodynamic effects of both ventilation modes were found to be similar. PVC may be preferable to VCV in patients who undergo open heart surgery. However, it would be convenient if our findings are supported by similar studies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Open heart surgery; Oxygenation; PaO2/fiO2 ratio; Pressure controlled; Ventilation; Volume controlled

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26992377     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-016-9824-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  48 in total

Review 1.  Pressure control ventilation.

Authors:  Dane Nichols; Sai Haranath
Journal:  Crit Care Clin       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.598

2.  Pressure-controlled ventilation improves oxygenation during laparoscopic obesity surgery compared with volume-controlled ventilation.

Authors:  P Cadi; T Guenoun; D Journois; J-M Chevallier; J-L Diehl; D Safran
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 3.  Pressure-controlled and volume-cycled mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  A W McKibben; S A Ravenscraft
Journal:  Clin Chest Med       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.878

4.  Effects of short-term pressure-controlled ventilation on gas exchange, airway pressures, and gas distribution in patients with acute lung injury/ARDS: comparison with volume-controlled ventilation.

Authors:  Maura Prella; François Feihl; Guido Domenighetti
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 9.410

5.  Prospective randomized trial comparing pressure-controlled ventilation and volume-controlled ventilation in ARDS. For the Spanish Lung Failure Collaborative Group.

Authors:  A Esteban; I Alía; F Gordo; R de Pablo; J Suarez; G González; J Blanco
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 9.410

6.  Cardiorespiratory effects of pressure controlled ventilation in severe respiratory failure.

Authors:  E Abraham; G Yoshihara
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 9.410

7.  Effects of protective and conventional mechanical ventilation on pulmonary function and systemic cytokine release after cardiopulmonary bypass.

Authors:  Ozge Koner; Serdar Celebi; Huriye Balci; Gurkan Cetin; Kamil Karaoglu; Nahit Cakar
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-01-13       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Intrapulmonary shunt after cardiopulmonary bypass: the use of vital capacity maneuvers versus off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  Edda M Tschernko; Anton Bambazek; Wilfried Wisser; Bernhard Partik; Ursula Jantsch; Klaus Kubin; Marek Ehrlich; Walter Klimscha; Michael Grimm; Franz P Keznickl
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.209

9.  [Evaluation of pulmonary function in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass.].

Authors:  Ricardo Antonio Guimarães Barbosa; Maria José Carvalho Carmona
Journal:  Rev Bras Anestesiol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 0.964

10.  Comparison of two ventilation modes in post-cardiac surgical patients.

Authors:  Aloka Samantaray; Nathan Hemanth
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2011-04
View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 2017 end of year summary: respiration.

Authors:  D S Karbing; G Perchiazzi; S E Rees; M B Jaffe
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 2.  Intraoperative use of low volume ventilation to decrease postoperative mortality, mechanical ventilation, lengths of stay and lung injury in adults without acute lung injury.

Authors:  Joanne Guay; Edward A Ochroch; Sandra Kopp
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-07-09

3.  Lung ultrasound score-based perioperative assessment of pressure-controlled ventilation-volume guaranteed or volume-controlled ventilation in geriatrics: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Young Sung Kim; Young Ju Won; Dong Kyu Lee; Byung Gun Lim; Heezoo Kim; Il Ok Lee; Jin Hee Yun; Myoung Hoon Kong
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 4.458

4.  Pressure-controlled ventilation could decrease intraoperative blood loss and improve airway pressure measures during lumbar discectomy in the prone position: A comparison with volume-controlled ventilation mode.

Authors:  Amir Abouzkry El-Sayed; Sherif Kamal Arafa; Ayman Mohamady El-Demerdash
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019 Oct-Dec

5.  Effects of ventilation mode type on intra-abdominal pressure and intra-operative blood loss in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery: A randomised clinical study.

Authors:  Sandeep Kundra; Rekha Gupta; Neeru Luthra; Mehak Dureja; Sunil Katyal
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2021-03-20
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.