Literature DB >> 26992001

Characteristics and follow-up of postmarketing studies of conditionally authorized medicines in the EU.

Jarno Hoekman1,2, Thea T Klamer1, Aukje K Mantel-Teeuwisse1, Hubert G M Leufkens1,3, Marie L De Bruin1,3.   

Abstract

AIM: The aim of the present study was to provide an insight into the characteristics and follow-up of postmarketing studies of medicines that were conditionally authorized in the European Union (EU).
METHODS: We compiled a list of all postmarketing studies attached as specific obligations to the licence of medicines that were granted conditional marketing authorization from January 2006 to April 2014. Studies were characterized based on their objective, design, status upon marketing authorization (MA) and due data set by authorities. They were linked to online study registrations (Clinicaltrials.gov, ENCePP) to determine completion date. We described and associated characteristics of studies and medicines, and determined whether studies were completed on time.
RESULTS: A total of 59 postmarketing studies were requested for 21 conditionally authorized medicines. Most studies had an interventional study design (73%), were ongoing upon MA (61%) and aimed to provide additional data on efficacy (45%). Interventional studies were more often ongoing and providing efficacy data, while observational and other studies were more often new and providing safety data. Frequent grounds for requesting postmarketing studies were 'long-term follow-up' and 'increase data on subpopulations'. Of the 34 studies eligible for follow-up analysis, 26 (76%) were completed and 17 (50%) completed on time. Actual completion time took a median (interquartile range) of 274 (-121 to 556) days longer than expected.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicated that most postmarketing studies attached to a conditional marketing authorization were eventually completed but that half were completed with a substantial delay. The observations suggest caution when broadening the use of postmarketing studies for resolving uncertainties about benefits and risks after MA.
© 2016 The British Pharmacological Society.

Keywords:  Benefit-risk assessment; drug; drug approval; legislation; postmarketing; product surveillance

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26992001      PMCID: PMC4917806          DOI: 10.1111/bcp.12940

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  16 in total

1.  New horizons in pharmaceutical regulation.

Authors:  Alasdair Breckenridge; Michelle Mello; Bruce M Psaty
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 84.694

2.  Evolution of regulatory frameworks.

Authors:  Alasdair Breckenridge; Peter Feldschreiber; Simon Gregor; June Raine; Leigh-Ann Mulcahy
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 84.694

3.  The Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act and postmarketing commitments.

Authors:  Kevin Fain; Matthew Daubresse; G Caleb Alexander
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Development times, clinical testing, postmarket follow-up, and safety risks for the new drugs approved by the US food and drug administration: the class of 2008.

Authors:  Thomas J Moore; Curt D Furberg
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 21.873

Review 5.  Bridging the efficacy-effectiveness gap: a regulator's perspective on addressing variability of drug response.

Authors:  Hans-Georg Eichler; Eric Abadie; Alasdair Breckenridge; Bruno Flamion; Lars L Gustafsson; Hubert Leufkens; Malcolm Rowland; Christian K Schneider; Brigitte Bloechl-Daum
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 84.694

6.  Risk management plans as a tool for proactive pharmacovigilance: a cohort study of newly approved drugs in Europe.

Authors:  N S Vermeer; R G Duijnhoven; S M J M Straus; A K Mantel-Teeuwisse; P R Arlett; A C G Egberts; H G M Leufkens; M L De Bruin
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 6.875

7.  Characteristics and follow-up of postmarketing studies of conditionally authorized medicines in the EU.

Authors:  Jarno Hoekman; Thea T Klamer; Aukje K Mantel-Teeuwisse; Hubert G M Leufkens; Marie L De Bruin
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 4.335

8.  Evaluation of post-authorization safety studies in the first cohort of EU Risk Management Plans at time of regulatory approval.

Authors:  Thijs J Giezen; Aukje K Mantel-Teeuwisse; Sabine M J M Straus; Toine C G Egberts; Stella Blackburn; Ingemar Persson; Hubert G M Leufkens
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.606

9.  From adaptive licensing to adaptive pathways: delivering a flexible life-span approach to bring new drugs to patients.

Authors:  H-G Eichler; L G Baird; R Barker; B Bloechl-Daum; F Børlum-Kristensen; J Brown; R Chua; S Del Signore; U Dugan; J Ferguson; S Garner; W Goettsch; J Haigh; P Honig; A Hoos; P Huckle; T Kondo; Y Le Cam; H Leufkens; R Lim; C Longson; M Lumpkin; J Maraganore; B O'Rourke; K Oye; E Pezalla; F Pignatti; J Raine; G Rasi; T Salmonson; D Samaha; S Schneeweiss; P D Siviero; M Skinner; J R Teagarden; T Tominaga; M R Trusheim; S Tunis; T F Unger; S Vamvakas; G Hirsch
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 6.875

10.  Number of patients studied prior to approval of new medicines: a database analysis.

Authors:  Ruben G Duijnhoven; Sabine M J M Straus; June M Raine; Anthonius de Boer; Arno W Hoes; Marie L De Bruin
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  14 in total

1.  Lessons learned on the design and the conduct of Post-Authorization Safety Studies: review of 3 years of PRAC oversight.

Authors:  Pierre Engel; Mariana Ferreira Almas; Marieke Louise De Bruin; Kathryn Starzyk; Stella Blackburn; Nancy Ann Dreyer
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Characteristics and follow-up of postmarketing studies of conditionally authorized medicines in the EU.

Authors:  Jarno Hoekman; Thea T Klamer; Aukje K Mantel-Teeuwisse; Hubert G M Leufkens; Marie L De Bruin
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Use of Real-World Data and Evidence in Drug Development of Medicinal Products Centrally Authorized in Europe in 2018-2019.

Authors:  Sini Marika Eskola; Hubertus Gerardus Maria Leufkens; Andrew Bate; Marie Louise De Bruin; Helga Gardarsdottir
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 6.903

4.  Postmarketing studies for novel drugs approved by both the FDA and EMA between 2005 and 2010: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Jean-David Zeitoun; Joseph S Ross; Ignacio Atal; Alexandre Vivot; Nicholas S Downing; Gabriel Baron; Philippe Ravaud
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Innovative regenerative medicines in the EU: a better future in evidence?

Authors:  Mark S Corbett; Andrew Webster; Robert Hawkins; Nerys Woolacott
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 8.775

6.  Delays in completion and results reporting of clinical trials under the Paediatric Regulation in the European Union: A cohort study.

Authors:  Thomas J Hwang; Paolo A Tomasi; Florence T Bourgeois
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 11.069

7.  Quality of evidence considered by Health Canada in granting full market authorisation to new drugs with a conditional approval: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Joel Lexchin
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-04-28       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  An analysis of characteristics of post-authorisation studies registered on the ENCePP EU PAS Register.

Authors:  Robert Carroll; Sreeram V Ramagopalan; Javier Cid-Ruzafa; Dimitra Lambrelli; Laura McDonald
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2017-08-14

9.  Oncologic orphan drugs approved in the EU - do clinical trial data correspond with real-world effectiveness?

Authors:  Yvonne Schuller; Marieke Biegstraaten; Carla E M Hollak; Heinz-Josef Klümpen; Christine C Gispen-de Wied; Violeta Stoyanova-Beninska
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 4.123

10.  Weighing of Evidence by Health Technology Assessment Bodies: Retrospective Study of Reimbursement Recommendations for Conditionally Approved Drugs.

Authors:  Rick A Vreman; Jacoline C Bouvy; Lourens T Bloem; Anke M Hövels; Aukje K Mantel-Teeuwisse; Hubert G M Leufkens; Wim G Goettsch
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 6.875

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.