| Literature DB >> 26991297 |
Feng Pan1, Zheng-Qiong Liu1, Que Chen1, Ying-Wen Xu1, Kai Hou1, Wei Wu2.
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to identify and investigate an endophytic fungus (strain 28) that was isolated from Houttuynia cordata Thunb, a famous and widely-used Traditional Chinese Medicine. Based on morphological methods and a phylogenetic analysis of ITS sequences, this strain was identified as Chaetomium globosum. An antifungal activity bioassay demonstrated that the crude ethyl acetate (EtOAc) extracts of strain 28 had a wide antifungal spectrum and strong antimicrobial activity, particularly against Exserohilum turcicum (Pass.) Leonard et Suggs, Botrytis cinerea persoon and Botrytis cinerea Pers. ex Fr. Furthermore, the fermentation conditions, extraction method and the heat stability of antifungal substances from strain 28 were also studied. The results showed that optimal antifungal activity can be obtained with the following parameters: using potato dextrose broth (PDB) as the base culture medium, fermentation for 4-8d (initial pH: 7.5), followed by extraction with EtOAc. The extract was stable at temperatures up to 80°C. This is the first report on the isolation of endophytic C. globosum from H. cordata to identify potential alternative biocontrol agents that could provide new opportunities for practical applications involving H. cordata.Entities:
Keywords: Antifungal activity; Chaetomium globosum; Endophytic fungi; Houttuynia cordata Thunb.; Process parameter
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26991297 PMCID: PMC4874678 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjm.2016.01.006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Microbiol ISSN: 1517-8382 Impact factor: 2.476
Fig. 1The colony and microstructure of strain 28: colony front sides (A), colony back sides (B), ascocarps (C) and spore morphology (D). The colonial morphology was observed after growing on a PDA plate at 28 °C for 6 d, and the microstructure of the strain was observed under an Olympus BX 51 fluorescence microscope (OLYMPUS OPTICAL.CO.LTD. Tokyo, Japan) after growing for 7 d.
Fig. 2Cluster analysis of strain 28. The sequences that showed E = 0.0 and the highest % similarity with the amplified sequences were included for alignment and bootstrapping using CLUSTALX. This figure shows the phylogenetic relations of this isolate with related fungi. Thus, this strain was identified as Chaetomium globosum of Chaetomium sp. through the rDNA sequencing of ITS region data. This tree was constructed on the basis of the rDNA sequence (ITS1, 5.8S and ITS 2) by Neighbor-joining method. Bootstrap values >50% (1000 replicates) are shown at the branches. The bar indicates a 5% sequence divergence.
The inhibition of 15 types of pathogens by strain 28 fermentation filtrate in vitro.
| Pathogens | Average diameter with extract (cm) | Control average diameter (cm) | Inhibition ratio (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 | 3.82 ± 0.22 | 8.62 ± 0.03 | 59.06 ± 2.66 |
| B2 | 2.83 ± 0.15 | 7.67 ± 0.12 | 67.44 ± 2.13 |
| B3 | 3.37 ± 0.23 | 8.67 ± 0.06 | 64.90 ± 2.76 |
| B4 | 3.62 ± 0.08 | 8.63 ± 0.06 | 61.68 ± 0.94 |
| B5 | 3.63 ± 0.12 | 8.27 ± 0.25 | 59.66 ± 1.49 |
| B6 | 0.50 ± 0.00 | 1.50 ± 0.20 | 100.00 ± 0.00 |
| B7 | 1.63 ± 0.35 | 8.70 ± 0.00 | 86.18 ± 4.28 |
| B8 | 3.73 ± 0.25 | 8.47 ± 0.32 | 59.41 ± 3.16 |
| B9 | 3.00 ± 0.10 | 8.70 ± 0.00 | 69.51 ± 1.22 |
| B10 | 2.80 ± 0.20 | 7.80 ± 0.26 | 68.49 ± 2.74 |
| B11 | 0.50 ± 0.00 | 3.20 ± 0.20 | 100.00 ± 0.00 |
| B12 | 3.60 ± 0.10 | 6.23 ± 0.25 | 45.93 ± 1.74 |
| B13 | 5.28 ± 0.10 | 8.70 ± 0.00 | 41.67 ± 1.27 |
| B14 | 0.50 ± 0.05 | 6.25 ± 0.48 | 100.00 ± 0.87 |
| B15 | 0.91 ± 0.01 | 5.38 ± 0.08 | 91.67 ± 0.24 |
Each value is the average ± standard deviation of triplicate determinations. Fusarium graminearum Sehw. (B1 for short), Alternaria solani (Ell. et Mart.) Sorauer (B2), Phytophthora capsici Leonian (B3), Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. niveum (B4), Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Lib.) de Bary (B5), Exserohilum turcicum (Pass.) Leonard et Suggs (B6), Aphanomyces raphani Kendrick (B7), Puccinia zoysiae Diet. (B8), Fusarium moniliforme Sheld. (B9), Alternaria alternata (Fries) Keissler (B10), Botrytis cinerea persoon (B11), Alternaria solani Sorauer (B12), Thielaviopsis basicola (Berk. et Br.) Ferraris (B13), Botrytis cinerea Pers. ex Fr. (B14), and Bipolaris maydis (Nisikado et Miyake) Shoeml (B15).
Fig. 3Antifungal activity of culture extracts produced with Chaetomium globosum strain 28. Fungus plugs (4 mm diameter) of pathogenic fungi (B6, B7, B11, B14 and B15) from the margins of actively growing colonies were placed in the center of PDA medium containing the 10% EtOAc extracting solution of strain 28 (v/v). In addition, the extract-free acetone (10% in medium) was used as a control (B6-CK, B7-CK, B11-CK, B14-CK and B15-CK).
The inhibition of B4 by strain 28 when cultivated in different liquid medium in vitro.
| Media | B4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Average diameter (cm) | Inhibition ratio (%) | |
| Gause No. 1 liquid medium | – | – |
| Czapek–Dox broth | 8.80 ± 0.00 a | 0.00 ± 0.00 f |
| Sabouraud's dextrose broth | 2.53 ± 0.08 e | 75.50 ± 0.92 b |
| BSE | 5.52 ± 0.03 b | 39.56 ± 0.35 e |
| Martin's broth | 1.95 ± 0.23 f | 82.53 ± 1.95 a |
| LB broth | 4.02 ± 0.03 c | 57.63 ± 0.35 d |
| Medium A | 3.90 ± 0.17 cd | 59.04 ± 2.09 cd |
| PDB | 3.60 ± 0.23 d | 62.65 ± 2.76 c |
| Control | 8.80 ± 0.05 a | 0.00 ± 0.60 f |
Each value is the average ± standard deviation of triplicate determinations.
Values with the same letter are not significantly different (p < 0.05) according to the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA).
The inhibition of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. niveum by strain 28 when cultivated in liquid medium in vitro at different pH values.
| Initial pH | ||
|---|---|---|
| Average diameter (cm) | Inhibition ratio (%) | |
| 6.0 | 2.25 ± 0.28 cd | 78.92 ± 3.35 ab |
| 6.3 | 2.40 ± 0.20 cd | 77.11 ± 2.41 ab |
| 6.6 | 2.33 ± 0.13 cd | 77.95 ± 1.52 ab |
| 6.9 | 2.02 ± 0.16 d | 81.69 ± 1.81 c |
| 7.2 | 2.53 ± 0.06 c | 75.54 ± 0.70 b |
| 7.5 | 3.05 ± 0.15 b | 69.28 ± 1.94 a |
| Control | 8.80 ± 0.05 a | 0.00 ± 0.60 d |
Each value is the average ± standard deviation of triplicate determinations.
Values with the same letters are not significantly different (p < 0.05) according to the one-way ANOVA.
The antifungal ability of strain 28 when cultivated for different times in vitro.
| Days | ||
|---|---|---|
| Average diameter (cm) | Inhibition ratio (%) | |
| 3 | 8.60 ± 0.17 a | 2.41 ± 2.09 d |
| 4 | 3.82 ± 0.08 d | 60.04 ± 0.92 a |
| 5 | 3.63 ± 0.12 d | 62.25 ± 1.39 a |
| 6 | 3.60 ± 0.10 d | 62.65 ± 1.20 a |
| 7 | 3.77 ± 0.06 d | 60.64 ± 0.70 a |
| 8 | 3.92 ± 0.18 d | 58.84 ± 2.12 a |
| 9 | 4.65 ± 0.09 c | 50.00 ± 1.04 b |
| 10 | 4.75 ± 0.05 c | 48.80 ± 0.60 b |
| 11 | 5.35 ± 0.13 b | 41.57 ± 1.59 c |
| 12 | 5.58 ± 0.16 b | 38.76 ± 1.94 c |
| Control | 8.80 ± 0.05 a | 0.00 ± 0.60 d |
Each value is the average ± standard deviation of triplicate determinations.
Values with the same letter are not significantly different (p < 0.05) according to the one-way ANOVA.
Inhibition ratio of the antimicrobial substances in strain 28 when treated at different temperatures in vitro.
| Temperature (°C) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Average diameter (cm) | Inhibition ratio (%) | |
| 40 | 4.20 ± 0.26 de | 54.88 ± 3.23 ab |
| 50 | 4.18 ± 0.03 e | 55.12 ± 0.35 a |
| 60 | 4.38 ± 0.18 de | 52.68 ± 2.14 ab |
| 70 | 4.58 ± 0.08 cd | 50.24 ± 0.93 bc |
| 80 | 4.73 ± 0.08 c | 48.41 ± 0.93 c |
| 90 | 7.97 ± 0.15 b | 8.90 ± 1.86 d |
| 100 | 8.70 ± 0.00 a | 0.00 ± 0.00 e |
| Control | 8.70 ± 0.09 a | 0.00 ± 1.06 e |
Each value is the average ± standard deviation of triplicate determinations.
Values with the same letters are not significantly different (p < 0.05) according to the one-way ANOVA.
Inhibition ratio of the fermentation filtrates from strain 28 when extracted in different solvents in vitro.
| Extraction solvents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Average diameter (cm) | Inhibition ratio (%) | |
| Petroleum ether | 4.22 ± 0.26 b | 55.18 ± 3.09 d |
| Diethyl ether | 2.12 ± 0.06 d | 80.48 ± 0.70 b |
| N-butyl alcohol | 2.20 ± 0.26 cd | 79.52 ± 3.19 bc |
| Ethyl acetate | 1.91 ± 0.02 e | 83.01 ± 0.28 a |
| Alcohol | 2.27 ± 0.06 c | 78.67 ± 0.70 c |
| Control | 8.80 ± 0.05 a | 0.00 ± 0.60 e |
Each value is the average ± standard deviation of triplicate determinations.
Values with the same letter are not significantly different (p < 0.05) according to the one-way ANOVA.