Literature DB >> 26990888

The impact of crystallization conditions on structure-based drug design: A case study on the methylene blue/acetylcholinesterase complex.

Orly Dym1,2, Wanling Song3, Clifford Felder4, Esther Roth5, Valery Shnyrov6, Yacov Ashani4, Yechun Xu3, Robbie P Joosten7, Lev Weiner8, Joel L Sussman1,4, Israel Silman5.   

Abstract

Structure-based drug design utilizes apoprotein or complex structures retrieved from the PDB. >57% of crystallographic PDB entries were obtained with polyethylene glycols (PEGs) as precipitant and/or as cryoprotectant, but <6% of these report presence of individual ethyleneglycol oligomers. We report a case in which ethyleneglycol oligomers' presence in a crystal structure markedly affected the bound ligand's position. Specifically, we compared the positions of methylene blue and decamethonium in acetylcholinesterase complexes obtained using isomorphous crystals precipitated with PEG200 or ammonium sulfate. The ligands' positions within the active-site gorge in complexes obtained using PEG200 are influenced by presence of ethyleneglycol oligomers in both cases bound to W84 at the gorge's bottom, preventing interaction of the ligand's proximal quaternary group with its indole. Consequently, both ligands are ∼3.0Å further up the gorge than in complexes obtained using crystals precipitated with ammonium sulfate, in which the quaternary groups make direct π-cation interactions with the indole. These findings have implications for structure-based drug design, since data for ligand-protein complexes with polyethylene glycol as precipitant may not reflect the ligand's position in its absence, and could result in selecting incorrect drug discovery leads. Docking methylene blue into the structure obtained with PEG200, but omitting the ethyleneglycols, yields results agreeing poorly with the crystal structure; excellent agreement is obtained if they are included. Many proteins display features in which precipitants might lodge. It will be important to investigate presence of precipitants in published crystal structures, and whether it has resulted in misinterpreting electron density maps, adversely affecting drug design.
© 2016 The Protein Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acetylcholinesterase; decamethonium; methylene blue; polyethylene glycol; structure-based drug discovery

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26990888      PMCID: PMC4941771          DOI: 10.1002/pro.2923

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein Sci        ISSN: 0961-8368            Impact factor:   6.725


  79 in total

1.  Structure of acetylcholinesterase complexed with E2020 (Aricept): implications for the design of new anti-Alzheimer drugs.

Authors:  G Kryger; I Silman; J L Sussman
Journal:  Structure       Date:  1999-03-15       Impact factor: 5.006

2.  Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy.

Authors:  Richard A Friesner; Jay L Banks; Robert B Murphy; Thomas A Halgren; Jasna J Klicic; Daniel T Mainz; Matthew P Repasky; Eric H Knoll; Mee Shelley; Jason K Perry; David E Shaw; Perry Francis; Peter S Shenkin
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2004-03-25       Impact factor: 7.446

3.  Analysis of differential scanning calorimetry data for proteins. Criteria of validity of one-step mechanism of irreversible protein denaturation.

Authors:  B I Kurganov; A E Lyubarev; J M Sanchez-Ruiz; V L Shnyrov
Journal:  Biophys Chem       Date:  1997-12-01       Impact factor: 2.352

4.  Extra precision glide: docking and scoring incorporating a model of hydrophobic enclosure for protein-ligand complexes.

Authors:  Richard A Friesner; Robert B Murphy; Matthew P Repasky; Leah L Frye; Jeremy R Greenwood; Thomas A Halgren; Paul C Sanschagrin; Daniel T Mainz
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 7.446

5.  Docking performance of the glide program as evaluated on the Astex and DUD datasets: a complete set of glide SP results and selected results for a new scoring function integrating WaterMap and glide.

Authors:  Matthew P Repasky; Robert B Murphy; Jay L Banks; Jeremy R Greenwood; Ivan Tubert-Brohman; Sathesh Bhat; Richard A Friesner
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  External and internal electrostatic potentials of cholinesterase models.

Authors:  C E Felder; S A Botti; S Lifson; I Silman; J L Sussman
Journal:  J Mol Graph Model       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 2.518

Review 7.  Multi-target design strategies in the context of Alzheimer's disease: acetylcholinesterase inhibition and NMDA receptor antagonism as the driving forces.

Authors:  Michela Rosini; Elena Simoni; Anna Minarini; Carlo Melchiorre
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 3.996

8.  Two partially unfolded states of Torpedo californica acetylcholinesterase.

Authors:  D I Kreimer; I Shin; V L Shnyrov; E Villar; I Silman; L Weiner
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 9.  In silico methods to assist drug developers in acetylcholinesterase inhibitor design.

Authors:  J A Bermúdez-Lugo; M C Rosales-Hernández; O Deeb; J Trujillo-Ferrara; J Correa-Basurto
Journal:  Curr Med Chem       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Incorporation of protein flexibility and conformational energy penalties in docking screens to improve ligand discovery.

Authors:  Marcus Fischer; Ryan G Coleman; James S Fraser; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  Nat Chem       Date:  2014-05-25       Impact factor: 24.427

View more
  7 in total

1.  Productive reorientation of a bound oxime reactivator revealed in room temperature X-ray structures of native and VX-inhibited human acetylcholinesterase.

Authors:  Oksana Gerlits; Xiaotian Kong; Xiaolin Cheng; Troy Wymore; Donald K Blumenthal; Palmer Taylor; Zoran Radić; Andrey Kovalevsky
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  A new crystal form of human acetylcholinesterase for exploratory room-temperature crystallography studies.

Authors:  Oksana Gerlits; Kwok-Yiu Ho; Xiaolin Cheng; Donald Blumenthal; Palmer Taylor; Andrey Kovalevsky; Zoran Radić
Journal:  Chem Biol Interact       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 5.192

3.  Structure of Klebsiella pneumoniae adenosine monophosphate nucleosidase.

Authors:  Brian C Richardson; Roger Shek; Wesley C Van Voorhis; Jarrod B French
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 3.752

4.  Understanding inhibitor resistance in Mps1 kinase through novel biophysical assays and structures.

Authors:  Yoshitaka Hiruma; Andre Koch; Nazila Hazraty; Foteini Tsakou; René H Medema; Robbie P Joosten; Anastassis Perrakis
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Kinetic and structural studies on the interactions of Torpedo californica acetylcholinesterase with two donepezil-like rigid analogues.

Authors:  Rosanna Caliandro; Alessandro Pesaresi; Luca Cariati; Antonio Procopio; Manuela Oliverio; Doriano Lamba
Journal:  J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 5.051

Review 6.  Detect, correct, retract: How to manage incorrect structural models.

Authors:  Alexander Wlodawer; Zbigniew Dauter; Przemyslaw J Porebski; Wladek Minor; Robyn Stanfield; Mariusz Jaskolski; Edwin Pozharski; Christian X Weichenberger; Bernhard Rupp
Journal:  FEBS J       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 5.542

7.  Controlled dehydration, structural flexibility and gadolinium MRI contrast compound binding in the human plasma glycoprotein afamin.

Authors:  Andreas Naschberger; Pauline Juyoux; Jill von Velsen; Bernhard Rupp; Matthew W Bowler
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 7.652

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.