| Literature DB >> 26990551 |
Rima Rafiq El Kishawi1, Kah Leng Soo1, Yehia Awad Abed2, Wan Abdul Manan Wan Muda1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In many developing countries nutritional, and epidemiological transitions are emerging into continuing undernutrition and escalating overnutrition, giving rise to the double burden of the malnutrition phenomenon.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26990551 PMCID: PMC4798763 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151494
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Anthropometric characteristics of child—mother pairs.
| Total (n = 357) | OWM/UWC (N = 56) | NWM/NWC (n = 90) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n (%) | Mean(SD) | n (%) | Mean (SD) | n (%) | Mean (SD) | |
| Weight (kg) | 70.95 (15.46) | 74.93(13.12) | 58.42(5.60) | |||
| Height (m) | 1.59 (0.05) | 1.56(0.06) | 1.60(0.05) | |||
| BMI (kg/m2) | 27.9 (5.91) | 30.31(4.63) | 22.60(1.68) | |||
| Underweight (BMI<18.5) | 7 (2.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | |||
| Normal weight (18.5–24.99) | 121 (33.9) | 0 (0.0) | 90 (100.0) | |||
| Overweight (BMI≥ 25.00) | 229 (64.1) | 56 (100.0) | 0 (0.0) | |||
| Weight(kg) | 14.20(2.42) | 12.25(1.64) | 14.20(1.87) | |||
| Height(cm) | 94.14(7.94) | 91.07(7.04) | 93.51(6.80) | |||
| Weight-Age (Z-score) | -0.48 (0.99) | -1.75(0.42) | -0.18 (0.67) | |||
| Significant underweight (<-2.0) | 13 (3.6) | |||||
| Mild underweight (-2.0-to<-1.0) | 74 (20.8) | |||||
| Underweight < -1 | 87 (24.4) | 56 (100.0) | 0 (0.0) | |||
| Norma weight (-1.0-to 2.0) | 267 (74.8) | 0 (0.0) | 90 (100.0) | |||
| Overweight>2 | 3 (0.8) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | |||
OWM/UWC: Overweight mother (BMI≥ 25. 0) /underweight child (< -1SD) indicated paradoxical burden malnutrition group
NWM/NWC: Normal weight mother/normal weight child indicated normal group
Classification of households with dual form of malnutrition overweight mother/underweight child according to nutritional status of child.
| Characteristics | Frequency (n) | Percent (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Overweight mother (BMI≥ 25.0) /Underweight child (Z-score<-2) | 9 | 2.5 |
| Overweight mother (BMI≥ 25.0) /Underweight child (Z-score -2.0-to<-1.0) (OWM/UWC) | 47 | 13.2 |
| Overweight mother (BMI≥ 25.0) /Underweight child (Z-score <-1) | 56 | 15.7 |
*WHO,2006
**WHO, 1983
Classification of households according to nutritional status of mother/child pairs.
| Characteristics | Frequency (n) | Percent (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Overweight mother/Underweight child (OWM/UWC) | 56 | 15.7 |
| Normal weight mother/Normal weight child (NWM/NWC) | 90 | 25.2 |
| Overweight mother/Normal weight child (OWM/NWC) | 172 | 48.1 |
| Normal weight mother/Underweight child (NWM/UWC) | 29 | 8.1 |
| Underweight mother/Underweight child (UWM/UWC) | 2 | 0.6 |
| Underweight mother/Normal weight child (UWM/UWC) | 5 | 1.4 |
| Overweight mother/ Overweight child (OWM/OWC) | 2 | 0.6 |
| Normal weight mother/Overweight child (NWM/OWC) | 1 | 0.3 |
Sociodemographic characteristics of normal weight mother/normal weight child and overweight mother/underweight child pairs.
| NWM/NWC (n = 90) | OWM/UWC (n = 56) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | n (%) | Mean(SD) | n (%) | Mean(SD) | Mean Difference (95% C.I.) | P-value | |
| City | 28(31.1) | 17(30.4) | 0.712 | ||||
| Rural | 8(8.9) | 3(5.3) | |||||
| Refugee camp | 54(60.0) | 36(64.3) | |||||
| Low | 31(34.4) | 23(41.1) | 0.191 | ||||
| Medium | 20(22.3) | 17(30.3) | |||||
| High | 39(43.3) | 16(28.6) | |||||
| Working | 64(71.1) | 46(82.1) | 0.168 | ||||
| Not working | 26(28.9) | 10(17.9) | |||||
| 5.6(1.67) | 6.96(1.90) | -4.53 (144) | -1.36 (-1.96,-0.77) | <0.001 | |||
| >2000 | 15(16.7) | 15(26.8) | 0.232 | ||||
| 1000–2000 | 32(35.5) | 21(37.5) | |||||
| <1000 | 43(47.8) | 20(35.7) | |||||
| Yes | 46(51.1) | 25(44.6) | 0.498 | ||||
| No | 44(48.9) | 31(55.4) | |||||
†† Independent t test.
† Pearson Chi-Square. Significant level p-value< 0.05
NWM/NWC:Normal weight mother/Normal weight child. OWM/UWC:Overweight mother/Underweight child
*1USD$ = 3.9Shekel
Mother &chid characteristics of normal weight mother/normal weight child and overweight mother/underweight child pairs.
| NWM/NWC (n = 90) | OWM/UWC (n = 56) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | n (%) | Mean(SD) | n (%) | Mean(SD) | Mean Difference (95% C.I.) | P-value | |
| 27.93(5.27) | 31.55(6.62) | -3.65 (144) | -3.62(-5.58,-1.66) | <0.001 | |||
| High | 27(30.0) | 13(23.2) | 0.033 | ||||
| Medium | 40(44.4) | 17(30.4) | |||||
| Low | 23(25.6) | 26(46.4) | |||||
| Employment | 4(4.4) | 6(7.1) | 0.483 | ||||
| Household | 86(95.6) | 52(92.9) | |||||
| 12.26(2.29) | 12.70(1.80) | -1.19 (144) | -0.49(-1.14,0.28) | 0.236 | |||
| 37.05(10.13) | 40.51(10.56) | -1.97 (144) | -3.64(-6.92,0.04) | 0.050 | |||
| Male | 44(48.9) | 30(53.6) | 0.613 | ||||
| Female | 46(51.1) | 26(64.4) | |||||
| 2.94 (1.88) | 4.43 (2.35) | -4.20 (144) | -1.48(-2.18,-0.78) | <0.001 | |||
| Good | 35(38.9) | 12(22.4) | 0.010 | ||||
| Fair | 35(38.9) | 19(33.9) | |||||
| Poor | 20(22.2) | 25(44.7) | |||||
| Yes | 24(26.7) | 11(19.6) | 0.426 | ||||
| No | 66(73.3) | 45(80.4) | |||||
†† Independent t test.
† Pearson Chi-Square. Significant level p-value< 0.05
NWM/NWC:Normal weight mother/Normal weight child. OWM/UWC:Overweight mother/Underweight child
Nutrients intake among mother-child pairs in households with dual form of malnutrition and normal households.
| Nutrients | Households with dual form of malnutrition (n = 56) | Normal Households (n = 90) | Mean diff. (95% C.I.) | t-statistic (df) | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | ||||
| Mothers | |||||
| Energy (Kcal) | 1448.67 (348.78) | 1430.00 (281.05) | -18.43(-102.17, 65.30) | -0.43 (144) | 0.665 |
| Protein (g/d) | 52.01 (20.66) | 50.80 (20.58) | -1.20 (-7.10, 4.68) | -0.40 (144) | 0.687 |
| Fat (g/d) | 70.73 (51.10) | 59.04 (37.17) | -11.68 (-25.97, 2.60) | 2.11 (144) | 0.044 |
| Carbohydrate (g/d) | 152.53 (78.48) | 148.73 (58.20) | -3.80 (-21.48, 13.88) | -0.42 (144) | 0.673 |
| Children | |||||
| Energy (Kcal) | 897.00 (322.78) | 910.56 (385.14) | 12.70 (-94.95, 120.36) | 0.23 (144) | 0.817 |
| Protein (g/d) | 31.31 (17.25) | 35.25 (21.93) | 3.94 (-2.14, 10.03) | 1.27 (144) | 0.203 |
| Fat (g/d) | 33.25 (15.40) | 34.11 (16.94) | 0.89 (-3.90, 5.67) | 0.36 (144) | 0.715 |
| Carbohydrate (g/d) | 110.60 (64.05) | 112.47 (76.54) | 0.86 (-20.53, 22.25) | 0.08 (144) | 0.937 |
Independent t test. Significant level p-value< 0.05
Associated factors of dual form of malnutrition in the same household.
| Variables | Simple Logistic Regression | Multiple Logistic Regression | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | Crude OR (95%CI) | P-value | Exp(B) | Adjusted OR (95.0% C.I.) | P-value | |
| Child birth order | 0.33 | 1.39 (1.17,1.65) | <0.001 | 0.40 | 1.50 (1.22,1.82) | <0.001 |
| Father’s medium educational level | 0.72 | 2.07 (0.86,4.94) | 0.101 | 1.16 | 3.19 (1.07,9.50) | 0.036 |
| Father’s low educational level | 0.59 | 1.80 (0.86,3.99) | 0.143 | 1.22 | 3.4 (1.12,10.37) | 0.031 |
| Family low income (Shekel) | -0.76 | 4.65 (0.19,1.13) | 0.092 | -1.26 | 0.28 (0.09,0.88) | 0.030 |
| Mother’s nutrition knowledge | -0.10 | 1.10 (0.93,1.30) | 0.236 | 0.210 | 1.23 (1.01,1.52) | 0.048 |
bBackward LR Binary Logistic regression model was applied.
Educational High level is the reference Diploma, university level, and master’s degree/PhD
Educational Medium level: secondary
Educational Low level: elementary or below and preparatory
High Income is the reference > 2000NIS (1$US = 3.9Shekel)