| Literature DB >> 20030822 |
Nahed Mikki1, Hanan F Abdul-Rahim, Faisal Awartani, Gerd Holmboe-Ottesen.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is little information about height and weight status of Palestinian adolescents. The objective of this paper was to assess the prevalence of stunting, underweight, and overweight/obesity among Palestinian school adolescents (13-15 years) and associated sociodemographic factors in 2 major governorates in the West Bank.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2009 PMID: 20030822 PMCID: PMC2813238 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-485
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Public Health ISSN: 1471-2458 Impact factor: 3.295
Sociodemographic characteristics of the study sample
| Ramallah governorate | Hebron governorate | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Sociodemographic factors | n = 935 | n = 1007 | Pa |
| % (n) | % (n) | ||
| Boys | 46.7 (437) | 45.5 (458) | |
| Girls | 53.3 (498) | 54.5 (549) | 0.919 |
| Urban | 41.0 (373) | 67.8 (663) | |
| Rural | 59.0 (537) | 32.2 (315) | 0.032 |
| 13 | 41.4 (387) | 32.9 (331) | |
| 14 | 44.5 (416) | 48.0 (484) | |
| 15 | 14.1 (132) | 19.1 (192) | 0.257 |
| Less than secondary school | 72.7 (662) | 77.2 (729) | |
| Secondary school/college or university or higher | 27.3 (249) | 22.8 (215) | 0.322 |
| Less than secondary school | 61.4 (557) | 66.3 (625) | |
| Secondary school | 16.7 (152) | 15.3 (144) | |
| College or university | 21.9 (199) | 18.4 (173) | 0.299 |
| Mean ± SD | 8.1 ± 2.4 | 8.9 ± 2.5 | 0.001 |
| 1-6 persons | 27.6 (240) | 12.5 (118) | |
| 7-8 persons | 34.7 (301) | 37.6 (355) | |
| > 8 persons | 37.7 (327) | 49.9 (472) | < 0.001 |
| Mean ± SD | 9.2 ± 2.9 | 8.0 ± 2.8 | 0.002 |
| Low (0-6) | 18.3 (156) | 29.5 (292) | |
| Medium (7-10) | 48.9 (418) | 52.4 (518) | |
| High (11-16) | 32.8 (280) | 18.1 (179) | 0.003 |
| Worse off (14-20) | 17.9 (159) | 30.7 (283) | |
| Medium (7-13) | 56.5 (503) | 54.1 (498) | |
| Better off (4-6) | 25.6 (228) | 15.2 (140) | < 0.001 |
SD: Standard deviation
aP for the comparison between governorates using χ2 tests for categorical variables and t-tests for means.
bHousehold standard of living index (STL) was based on the possession of 16 household amenities; each item given a value of 1.
cPresent household economic situation index was formulated based on 4 questions: - "Do you have enough money to cover family needs now?" "At the present time, do you have any debts?" At the present time, to what extent do you have to postpone paying bills?" and "During the past school year, did you have to borrow money to cover family needs?"
Sample and population size weighted results of the anthropometric characteristics of the sample of 1942 Palestinian adolescents from Ramallah and Hebron governorates
| Ramallah | Hebron | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Totala | Boys | Girls | Pb | Totala | Boys | Girls | Pb | |
| n = 935 | n = 437 | n = 498 | n = 1007 | n = 458 | n = 549 | |||
| Age (years), mean (SE) | 14.4 (0.1) | 14.4 (0.1) | 14.4 (0.1) | 0.983 | 14.4 (0.1) | 14.3 (0.1) | 14.4 (0.1) | 0.273 |
| Age of onset of puberty (years), mean (SE) | 13.1 (0.1)* | 13.1 (0.1) | 13.0 (0.1) | 0.226 | 13.3 (0.1)* | 13.5 (0.1) | 13.1 (0.1) | 0.015 |
| Weight (kg), mean (SE) | 53.4 (1.0) | 53.5 (1.8) | 53.3 (1.0) | 0.899 | 51.1 (0.7) | 50.1 (1.3) | 51.9 (0.5) | 0.206 |
| BMI (kg/m2), mean (SE) | 20.7 (0.3) | 20.1 (0.4) | 21.2 (0.3) | 0.045 | 20.1 (0.2) | 19.3 (0.3) | 20.7 (0.2) | 0.001 |
| BMI percentile, mean (SE) | 53.5 (2.1) | 47.2 (2.4) | 58.6 (2.4) | 0.002 | 49.1 (1.8) | 42.0 (2.5) | 54.9 (1.5) | < 0.001 |
| Underweight % (95% CI) | 6.1 (4.4, 8.3)* | 9.7 (7.7, 12.3) | 3.1 (1.8, 5.3) | 9.1 (7.1, 11.6)* | 12.9 (9.5, 17.2) | 6.0 (4.1, 8.7) | ||
| Overweight % (95% CI) | 12.9 (9.7, 16.9) | 9.6 (7.2, 12.7) | 15.6 (10.7, 22.2) | 0.005 | 11.2 (9.1, 13.8) | 8.5 (6.0, 12.0) | 13.5 (10.5, 17.1) | 0.001 |
| Obesity % (95% CI) | 7.0 (4.7, 10.4) | 8.2 (4.1, 15.7) | 6.0 (3.9, 9.3) | 4.1 (2.9, 5.8) | 4.9 (2.8, 8.5) | 3.4 (2.2, 5.6) | ||
| Overweight % (95% CI) | 16.4 (12.9, 20.5)* | 13.3 (10.6, 16.5) | 18.9 (13.5, 25.9) | 13.1 (10.9, 15.7)* | 10.9 (7.9, 14.9) | 14.9 (11.9, 18.6) | ||
| Obesity % (95% CI) | 4.1 (2.4, 7.1) | 5.2 (2.0, 12.9) | 3.3 (2.1, 4.9) | 0.182 | 2.1 (1.3, 3.4) | 2.2 (1.1, 4.6) | 2.0 (1.0, 3.9) | 0.230 |
| Height (cm), mean (SE) | 160.0 (0.7) | 162.1 (1.1) | 158.3 (0.5) | 0.005 | 159.2 (0.4) | 160.3 (0.8) | 158.4 (0.3) | 0.027 |
| Height for age percentile, mean (SE) | 38.1 (1.6) | 36.9 (2.6) | 39.1 (2.1) | 0.510 | 36.1 (1.2) | 33.3 (1.7) | 38.5 (1.3) | 0.022 |
| Stunting % (95% CI) | 7.3 (5.1, 10.4) | 9.2 (5.2, 15.4) | 5.9 (3.9, 8.8) | 0.195 | 6.5 (5.1, 8.3) | 9.4 (7.5, 11.7) | 4.2 (2.8, 6.2) | < 0.001 |
SE: Standard error. BMI: body mass index, 95% CI: 95% confidence interval. CDC: Center for Disease Control and Prevention, IOTF: International Obesity Task Force.
*P < 0.05
aP is for the difference between total adolescents in Ramallah governorate and total adolescents in Hebron governorates using χ2 for categorical variables and t-test for means.
bP is for the difference between genders in the same governorate using χ2 for categorical variables and t-test for means.
Number of adolescents who have reached puberty: boys from Ramallah = 363, girls from Ramallah = 389, boys from Hebron = 365, and girls from Hebron = 465.
Sample and population weighted results of stunting, underweight and overweight/obesity of Palestinian boys from Ramallah and Hebron governorates by sociodemographic characteristics (n = 895)
| Ramallah governorate | Hebron governorate | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | Stunting | Underweight | Overweight/ | n | Stunting | Underweight | Overweight/ | |
| Urban | 197 | 4.8* | 9.4 | 21.2 | 309 | 9.4 | 10.6 | 15.3* |
| Rural | 228 | 13.1 | 9.6 | 15.8 | 133 | 10.6 | 18.9 | 6.8 |
| 13 | 180 | 7.2 | 9.4 | 21.1 | 181 | 7.2 | 12.2 | 11.1 |
| 14 | 192 | 9.4 | 12.1 | 15.0 | 210 | 10.5 | 12.9 | 13.3 |
| 15 | 65 | 10.7 | 5.2 | 18.8 | 67 | 11.9 | 14.8 | 19.4 |
| Low | 307 | 10.8* | 10.1 | 16.2 | 316 | 8.2 | 11.4 | 14.3 |
| Medium/High | 110 | 3.5 | 9.0 | 23.2 | 106 | 10.5 | 17.0 | 9.4 |
| Low | 270 | 11.6 | 10.2 | 14.4 | 278 | 9.7 | 13.2 | 13.8 |
| Medium | 64 | 5.1 | 10.2 | 32.4 | 59 | 13.6 | 6.8 | 13.6 |
| High | 84 | 5.0 | 9.0 | 17.6 | 84 | 2.4 | 15.6 | 10.7 |
| 1-6 persons | 129 | 5.4 | 6.6 | 25.6e | 59 | 5.1 | 11.8 | 11.8 |
| 7-8 persons | 142 | 10.8 | 11.3 | 20.0 | 166 | 8.4 | 10.2 | 16.9 |
| > 8 persons | 111 | 11.8 | 14.3 | 10.0 | 195 | 10.3 | 15.4 | 9.8 |
| Low | 56 | 15.5e | 7.0 | 9.2* e | 116 | 9.5 | 16.5 | 9.6 |
| Medium | 202 | 10.7 | 12.3 | 15.4 | 231 | 9.1 | 14.3 | 9.5 |
| High | 147 | 3.1 | 6.7 | 25.1 | 103 | 7.8 | 4.8 | 25.3*** |
| Worse off | 68 | 8.8 | 11.0 | 12.8 | 120 | 13.4* | 15.8 | 15.2 |
| Medium | 233 | 11.5 | 10.9 | 14.8 | 224 | 8.5 | 12.5 | 10.3 |
| Better off | 115 | 5.8 | 6.6 | 26.5 | 73 | 2.8 | 9.6 | 17.8 |
| Not available | 128 | 13.5** | 13.2 | 11.7 | 193 | 10.9 | 14.5 | 11.5 |
| Available | 292 | 7.5 | 8.8 | 20.6 | 229 | 7.0 | 11.3 | 14.4 |
| No | 74 | 16.6* | 14.2 | 17.2 | 92 | 15.2 | 25.0 | 7.6** |
| Yes | 363 | 7.8 | 9.0 | 17.9 | 365 | 8.0 | 9.9 | 14.6 |
*P < 0.05 **P < 0.01 ***P < 0.001
eP for trend < 0.05
aOverweight/obesity were defined using the 2000 CDC reference.
bHousehold standard of living index (STL) was based on the possession of 16 household amenities; each item given a value of 1.
cPresent household economic situation index was formulated based on 4 questions: - "Do you have enough money to cover family
needs now?" "At the present time, do you have any debts?" At the present time, to what extent do you have to postpone paying bills?" and "During the past school year, did you have to borrow money to cover family needs?".
dFood availability was based on the question: is there enough food for all family members on daily basis now?
Sample and population weighted results of stunting, underweight and overweight/obesity of Palestinian girls from Ramallah and Hebron governorates by sociodemographic characteristics (n = 1047)
| Ramallah governorate | Hebron governorate | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | Stunting | Underweight | Overweight/ | n | Stunting | Underweight | Overweight/ | |
| Urban | 176 | 1.9** | 3.3 | 24.0 | 354 | 3.4 | 6.8 | 18.6 |
| Rural | 309 | 7.9 | 3.1 | 20.7 | 182 | 6.0 | 5.0 | 14.2 |
| 13 | 207 | 5.6 | 1.9 | 22.1 | 150 | 6.0e | 7.4 | 20.7 |
| 14 | 224 | 6.3 | 4.7 | 21.9 | 274 | 4.7 | 4.4 | 16.1 |
| 15 | 67 | 5.2 | 1.0 | 20.2 | 125 | 1.0 | 8.0 | 14.4 |
| Low | 355 | 6.0 | 2.6 | 22.2 | 413 | 5.1 | 6.3 | 16.4 |
| Medium/High | 139 | 5.2 | 4.6 | 19.4 | 109 | 0.9 | 6.5 | 17.4 |
| Low | 287 | 5.7 | 3.5 | 23.8 | 347 | 4.6 | 6.3 | 17.8 |
| Medium | 88 | 6.5 | 1.7 | 15.7 | 85 | 4.7 | 7.0 | 13.0 |
| High | 115 | 5.9 | 3.1 | 19.2 | 89 | 2.2 | 5.6 | 14.6 |
| 1-6 persons | 111 | 2.8 | 1.4 | 29.1e | 59 | 5.1 | 5.1 | 18.4 |
| 7-8 persons | 159 | 6.1 | 3.6 | 24.7 | 189 | 4.8 | 6.4 | 17.5 |
| > 8 persons | 216 | 7.0 | 3.5 | 16.9 | 277 | 3.6 | 6.5 | 15.5 |
| Low | 100 | 8.4 | 4.0 | 12.7e | 176 | 7.9** | 5.1 | 14.8 |
| Medium | 216 | 6.4 | 2.5 | 21.8 | 287 | 2.4 | 6.6 | 18.1 |
| High | 133 | 3.6 | 3.3 | 26.2 | 76 | 2.7 | 6.6 | 18.3 |
| Worse off | 91 | 5.2 | 1.8 | 26.1 | 163 | 3.6 | 8.0 | 15.4 |
| Medium | 270 | 6.2 | 3.4 | 20.5 | 274 | 5.1 | 5.5 | 16.0 |
| Better off | 113 | 5.7 | 4.0 | 16.8 | 67 | 3.0 | 7.5 | 17.9 |
| Not available | 165 | 4.0 | 2.7 | 26.6 | 255 | 4.7 | 7.1 | 15.7 |
| Available | 327 | 6.8 | 3.3 | 19.0 | 269 | 3.7 | 5.6 | 17.4 |
| No | 100 | 15.6** | 6.4 | 11.5** | 84 | 10.6** | 20.3 | 3.7*** |
| Yes | 389 | 4.2 | 2.5 | 23.5 | 465 | 3.0 | 3.5 | 19.3 |
*P < 0.05 **P < 0.01 *** P < 0.001
eP for trend < 0.05
Overweight/obesity were defined using the 2000 CDC reference.
bHousehold standard of living index (STL) was based on the possession of 16 household amenities; each item given a value of 1.
cPresent household economic situation index was formulated d based on 4 questions: - "Do you have enough money to cover family needs now?" "At the present time, do you have any debts?" At the present time, to what extent do you have to postpone paying bills?" and "During the past school year, did you have to borrow money to cover family needs?".
dFood availability was based on the question: is there enough food for all family members on daily basis now?
Sample and population weighted results of the multivariate logistic regression models for the relationship between stunting, overweight/obesity and selected sociodemographic variables in a sample of 1942 Palestinian adolescents in Ramallah and Hebron governorates
| Boys | Girls | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stunting | Overweight/obesitya | Stunting | Overweight/obesitya | |||||
| OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | |
| Hebron | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Ramallah | 1.37 | 0.75-2.51 | 1.57 | 0.93-2.65 | 1.26 | 0.76-2.09 | 1.38 | 0.87-2.18 |
| Rural | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||
| Urban | 0.96 | 0.51-1.81 | 1.27 | 0.68-2.38 | 0.45 | 0.23-0.89* | ||
| 13 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| 14 | 1.45 | 0.83-2.51 | 0.93 | 0.57-1.54 | 0.94 | 0.55-1.60 | 0.75 | 0.46-1.23 |
| 15 | 2.15 | 1.16-3.98* | 1.58 | 0.91-2.74 | 0.37 | 0.13-1.06 | 0.61 | 0.33-1.10 |
| Low | 1 | |||||||
| Medium | 1.18 | 0.51-2.72 | ||||||
| High | 0.23 | 0.07-0.74* | ||||||
| Low | 1 | |||||||
| Medium/high | 1.91 | 0.89-4.09 | ||||||
| 1-6 persons | 0.57 | 0.23-1.40 | 1.78 | 0.97-3.28 | 1.42 | 0.82-2.47 | ||
| 7-8 persons | 1.06 | 0.56-2.04 | 1.77 | 0.96-3.24 | 1.24 | 0.80-1.93 | ||
| > 8 persons | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||
| Low | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||
| Medium | 0.82 | 0.37-1.79 | 1.10 | 0.64-1.88 | 0.45 | 0.25-0.82* | ||
| High | 0.94 | 0.35-2.53 | 2.08 | 1.19-3.63* | 0.43 | 0.13-1.39 | ||
| Worse off | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| Medium | 0.85 | 0.45-1.62 | 0.64 | 0.34-1.22 | ||||
| Better off | 0.28 | 0.08-1.02 | 0.97 | 0.53-1.77 | ||||
| Not available | 1 | |||||||
| Available | 0.88 | 0.56-1.38 | ||||||
| No | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Yes | 0.50 | 0.25-1.02 | 1.53 | 0.74-3.19 | 0.26 | 0.13-0.49*** | 4.80 | 2.29-10.04*** |
OR: Odds ratios, 95%CI: 95% confidence intervals
*P < 0.05 **P < 0.01 ***P < 0.001
Overweight/obesity were defined using the 2000 CDC reference.
bHousehold standard of living index (STL) was based on the possession of 16 household amenities; each item given a value of 1.
cPresent household economic situation index was formed based on 4 questions: - "Do you have enough money to cover family needs now?" "At the present time, do you have any debts?" At the present time, to what extent do you have to postpone paying bills?" and "During the past school year, did you have to borrow money to cover family needs?"
dFood availability was based on the question: is there enough food for all family members on daily basis now?