Andreia Almeida1, Daniel Kolarich2. 1. Department of Biomolecular Systems, Max Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces, 14424 Potsdam, Germany; Institute for Chemistry and Biochemistry, Freie Universität Berlin, Arnimallee 22, 14195 Berlin, Germany. 2. Department of Biomolecular Systems, Max Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces, 14424 Potsdam, Germany. Electronic address: daniel.kolarich@mpikg.mpg.de.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Complex diseases such as cancer are a consequence of numerous causes. State of the art personalised medicine approaches are mostly based on evaluating patients' individual genetic background. Despite the advances of genomics it fails to take individual dynamic influences into account that contribute to the individual and unique glycomic and glycoproteomic "configurations" of every living being. SCOPE OF REVIEW: Glycomic and glycoproteomic-based personalised medicine diagnostics are still in their infancies, however some initial success stories indicate that these fields are highly promising to mediate novel early diagnosis and disease stratification markers, subsequently resulting in improved patient well-being and reduced treatment costs. In this review we not only summarise current protein glycosylation based examples that substantially improve or possess great potential for personalised medicine, but also describe current limitations as well as future perspectives and challenges associated with establishing protein glycosylation aspects for this purpose. MAJOR CONCLUSIONS: Many protein biomarkers currently in clinical use are glycoproteins, however, their glycosylation status is seldom evaluated in a clinical context. To date just few examples have already been successfully translated into clinical practice, making protein glycosylation a highly promising diagnostic target with humongous potential for personalised medicine. GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE: There is an urgent need for markers that enable the establishment of an individualised and optimised patient treatment at the earliest disease stage possible. The glycosylation status of a patient and/or specific marker proteins can provide important clues that result in improved patient management. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled "Glycans in personalised medicine" Guest Editor: Professor Gordan Lauc.
BACKGROUND: Complex diseases such as cancer are a consequence of numerous causes. State of the art personalised medicine approaches are mostly based on evaluating patients' individual genetic background. Despite the advances of genomics it fails to take individual dynamic influences into account that contribute to the individual and unique glycomic and glycoproteomic "configurations" of every living being. SCOPE OF REVIEW: Glycomic and glycoproteomic-based personalised medicine diagnostics are still in their infancies, however some initial success stories indicate that these fields are highly promising to mediate novel early diagnosis and disease stratification markers, subsequently resulting in improved patient well-being and reduced treatment costs. In this review we not only summarise current protein glycosylation based examples that substantially improve or possess great potential for personalised medicine, but also describe current limitations as well as future perspectives and challenges associated with establishing protein glycosylation aspects for this purpose. MAJOR CONCLUSIONS: Many protein biomarkers currently in clinical use are glycoproteins, however, their glycosylation status is seldom evaluated in a clinical context. To date just few examples have already been successfully translated into clinical practice, making protein glycosylation a highly promising diagnostic target with humongous potential for personalised medicine. GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE: There is an urgent need for markers that enable the establishment of an individualised and optimised patient treatment at the earliest disease stage possible. The glycosylation status of a patient and/or specific marker proteins can provide important clues that result in improved patient management. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled "Glycans in personalised medicine" Guest Editor: Professor Gordan Lauc.
Authors: Jarrod W Barnes; Adriano R Tonelli; Gustavo A Heresi; Jennie E Newman; Noël E Mellor; David E Grove; Raed A Dweik Journal: Pulm Circ Date: 2016-12 Impact factor: 3.017
Authors: Shadi Ferdosi; Douglas S Rehder; Paul Maranian; Erik P Castle; Thai H Ho; Harvey I Pass; Daniel W Cramer; Karen S Anderson; Lei Fu; David E C Cole; Tao Le; Xifeng Wu; Chad R Borges Journal: J Proteome Res Date: 2017-11-21 Impact factor: 4.466
Authors: Hannes Hinneburg; Petra Korać; Falko Schirmeister; Slavko Gasparov; Peter H Seeberger; Vlatka Zoldoš; Daniel Kolarich Journal: Mol Cell Proteomics Date: 2017-01-25 Impact factor: 5.911
Authors: Motamed Elsayed Mahmoud; Ibrahim F Rehan; Kh El-Dawy Ahmed; Amany Abdelrahman; Saeed Mohammadi; Ahmed F Abou-Elnaga; Mohammed Youssef; Hassan Mahmoud Diab; Doaa Salman; Asmaa Elnagar; Hesham H Mohammed; Obeid Shanab; Rawia M Ibrahim; Eslam K H Ahmed; Abd El-Latif Hesham; Arti Gupta Journal: Mol Biol Rep Date: 2019-03-26 Impact factor: 2.316
Authors: Uwe Möginger; Sonja Grunewald; René Hennig; Chu-Wei Kuo; Falko Schirmeister; Harald Voth; Erdmann Rapp; Kay-Hooi Khoo; Peter H Seeberger; Jan C Simon; Daniel Kolarich Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2018-03-21 Impact factor: 6.244