Virginia A Rauh1,2, Amy E Margolis2,3. 1. Heilbrunn Department of Population and Family Health, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. 2. Columbia Center for Children's Environmental Health, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. 3. Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Environmental exposures play a critical role in the genesis of some child mental health problems. METHODS: We open with a discussion of children's vulnerability to neurotoxic substances, changes in the distribution of toxic exposures, and cooccurrence of social and physical exposures. We address trends in prevalence of mental health disorders, and approaches to the definition of disorders that are sensitive to the subtle effects of toxic exposures. We suggest broadening outcomes to include dimensional measures of autism spectrum disorders, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, and child learning capacity, as well as direct assessment of brain function. FINDINGS: We consider the impact of two important exposures on children's mental health: lead and pesticides. We argue that longitudinal research designs may capture the cascading effects of exposures across biological systems and the full-range of neuropsychological endpoints. Neuroimaging is a valuable tool for observing brain maturation under varying environmental conditions. A dimensional approach to measurement may be sensitive to subtle subclinical toxic effects, permitting the development of exposure-related profiles and testing of complex functional relationships between brain and behavior. Questions about the neurotoxic effects of chemicals become more pressing when viewed through the lens of environmental justice. CONCLUSIONS: Reduction in the burden of child mental health disorders will require longitudinal study of neurotoxic exposures, incorporating dimensional approaches to outcome assessment, and measures of brain function. Research that seeks to identify links between toxic exposures and mental health outcomes has enormous public health and societal value.
BACKGROUND: Environmental exposures play a critical role in the genesis of some child mental health problems. METHODS: We open with a discussion of children's vulnerability to neurotoxic substances, changes in the distribution of toxic exposures, and cooccurrence of social and physical exposures. We address trends in prevalence of mental health disorders, and approaches to the definition of disorders that are sensitive to the subtle effects of toxic exposures. We suggest broadening outcomes to include dimensional measures of autism spectrum disorders, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, and child learning capacity, as well as direct assessment of brain function. FINDINGS: We consider the impact of two important exposures on children's mental health: lead and pesticides. We argue that longitudinal research designs may capture the cascading effects of exposures across biological systems and the full-range of neuropsychological endpoints. Neuroimaging is a valuable tool for observing brain maturation under varying environmental conditions. A dimensional approach to measurement may be sensitive to subtle subclinical toxic effects, permitting the development of exposure-related profiles and testing of complex functional relationships between brain and behavior. Questions about the neurotoxic effects of chemicals become more pressing when viewed through the lens of environmental justice. CONCLUSIONS: Reduction in the burden of childmental health disorders will require longitudinal study of neurotoxic exposures, incorporating dimensional approaches to outcome assessment, and measures of brain function. Research that seeks to identify links between toxic exposures and mental health outcomes has enormous public health and societal value.
Authors: Jessica G Young; Brenda Eskenazi; Eleanor A Gladstone; Asa Bradman; Lesley Pedersen; Caroline Johnson; Dana B Barr; Clement E Furlong; Nina T Holland Journal: Neurotoxicology Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 4.294
Authors: Virginia A Rauh; Frederica P Perera; Megan K Horton; Robin M Whyatt; Ravi Bansal; Xuejun Hao; Jun Liu; Dana Boyd Barr; Theodore A Slotkin; Bradley S Peterson Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2012-04-30 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Brian D Curwin; Misty J Hein; Wayne T Sanderson; Marcia G Nishioka; Stephen J Reynolds; Elizabeth M Ward; Michael C Alavanja Journal: J Occup Environ Hyg Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 2.155
Authors: Bruce P Lanphear; Richard Hornung; Jane Khoury; Kimberly Yolton; Peter Baghurst; David C Bellinger; Richard L Canfield; Kim N Dietrich; Robert Bornschein; Tom Greene; Stephen J Rothenberg; Herbert L Needleman; Lourdes Schnaas; Gail Wasserman; Joseph Graziano; Russell Roberts Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Gertrud S Berkowitz; Josephine Obel; Elena Deych; Robert Lapinski; James Godbold; Zhisong Liu; Philip J Landrigan; Mary S Wolff Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Evelyn O Talbott; Lynne P Marshall; Judith R Rager; Vincent C Arena; Ravi K Sharma; Shaina L Stacy Journal: Environ Health Date: 2015-10-06 Impact factor: 5.984
Authors: Harriet Kitzman; David L Olds; Michael D Knudtson; Robert Cole; Elizabeth Anson; Joyce A Smith; Diana Fishbein; Ralph DiClemente; Gina Wingood; Angela M Caliendo; Christian Hopfer; Ted Miller; Gabriella Conti Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2019-11-20 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Elizabeth Friedman; Marnie F Hazlehurst; Christine Loftus; Catherine Karr; Kelsey N McDonald; Jose Ricardo Suarez-Lopez Journal: Int J Hyg Environ Health Date: 2019-10-10 Impact factor: 5.840
Authors: Jane S Burns; Paige L Williams; Mary M Lee; Boris Revich; Oleg Sergeyev; Russ Hauser; Susan A Korrick Journal: Environ Int Date: 2017-06-07 Impact factor: 9.621
Authors: Diane S Rohlman; Ahmed Ismail; Matthew R Bonner; Gaafar Abdel Rasoul; Olfat Hendy; Lizette Ortega Dickey; Kai Wang; James R Olson Journal: Neurotoxicology Date: 2019-05-08 Impact factor: 4.294