Kylie D Rock1, Heather B Patisaul2,3. 1. Department of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27695, USA. 2. Department of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27695, USA. hbpatisa@ncsu.edu. 3. Center for Human Health and the Environment, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27695, USA. hbpatisa@ncsu.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: With the incidence of neurodevelopmental disorders on the rise, it is imperative to identify and understand the mechanisms by which environmental contaminants can impact the developing brain and heighten risk. Here, we report on recent findings regarding novel mechanisms of developmental neurotoxicity and highlight chemicals of concern, beyond traditionally defined neurotoxicants. RECENT FINDINGS: The perinatal window represents a critical and extremely vulnerable period of time during which chemical insult can alter the morphological and functional trajectory of the developing brain. Numerous chemical classes have been associated with alterations in neurodevelopment including metals, solvents, pesticides, and, more recently, endocrine-disrupting compounds. Although mechanisms of neurotoxicity have traditionally been identified as pathways leading to neuronal cell death, neuropathology, or severe neural injury, recent research highlights alternative mechanisms that result in more subtle but consequential changes in the brain and behavior. These emerging areas of interest include neuroendocrine and immune disruption, as well as indirect toxicity via actions on other organs such as the gut and placenta. Understanding of the myriad ways in which the developing brain is vulnerable to chemical exposures has grown tremendously over the past decade. Further progress and implementation in risk assessment is critical to reducing risk of neurodevelopmental disorders.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: With the incidence of neurodevelopmental disorders on the rise, it is imperative to identify and understand the mechanisms by which environmental contaminants can impact the developing brain and heighten risk. Here, we report on recent findings regarding novel mechanisms of developmental neurotoxicity and highlight chemicals of concern, beyond traditionally defined neurotoxicants. RECENT FINDINGS: The perinatal window represents a critical and extremely vulnerable period of time during which chemical insult can alter the morphological and functional trajectory of the developing brain. Numerous chemical classes have been associated with alterations in neurodevelopment including metals, solvents, pesticides, and, more recently, endocrine-disrupting compounds. Although mechanisms of neurotoxicity have traditionally been identified as pathways leading to neuronal cell death, neuropathology, or severe neural injury, recent research highlights alternative mechanisms that result in more subtle but consequential changes in the brain and behavior. These emerging areas of interest include neuroendocrine and immune disruption, as well as indirect toxicity via actions on other organs such as the gut and placenta. Understanding of the myriad ways in which the developing brain is vulnerable to chemical exposures has grown tremendously over the past decade. Further progress and implementation in risk assessment is critical to reducing risk of neurodevelopmental disorders.
Authors: Prasada Rao S Kodavanti; Cary G Coburn; Virginia C Moser; Robert C MacPhail; Suzanne E Fenton; Tammy E Stoker; Jennifer L Rayner; Kurunthachalam Kannan; Linda S Birnbaum Journal: Toxicol Sci Date: 2010-04-07 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Toby B Cole; Rachel L Jampsa; Betsy J Walter; Tara L Arndt; Rebecca J Richter; Diana M Shih; Aaron Tward; Aldons J Lusis; Rhona M Jack; Lucio G Costa; Clement E Furlong Journal: Pharmacogenetics Date: 2003-06
Authors: Bruce P Lanphear; Richard Hornung; Jane Khoury; Kimberly Yolton; Peter Baghurst; David C Bellinger; Richard L Canfield; Kim N Dietrich; Robert Bornschein; Tom Greene; Stephen J Rothenberg; Herbert L Needleman; Lourdes Schnaas; Gail Wasserman; Joseph Graziano; Russell Roberts Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Karl C K Kuban; Hernan Jara; T Michael O'Shea; Timothy Heeren; Robert M Joseph; Raina N Fichorova; Khalid Alshamrani; Adam Aakil; Forrest Beaulieu; Mitchell Horn; Laurie M Douglass; Jean A Frazier; Deborah Hirtz; Julie Vanier Rollins; David Cochran; Nigel Paneth Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2019-05-07 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Chelsea A Weitekamp; Rachel M Shaffer; Catheryne Chiang; Geniece M Lehmann; Krista Christensen Journal: Chemosphere Date: 2022-06-25 Impact factor: 8.943
Authors: Spencer W Todd; Eric W Lumsden; Yasco Aracava; Jacek Mamczarz; Edson X Albuquerque; Edna F R Pereira Journal: Neuropharmacology Date: 2020-08-16 Impact factor: 5.250
Authors: Stephanie M Bilinovich; Kristy Lewis; Barbara L Thompson; Jeremy W Prokop; Daniel B Campbell Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-10-10 Impact factor: 3.390