Literature DB >> 26987456

Variation Interpretation Predictors: Principles, Types, Performance, and Choice.

Abhishek Niroula1, Mauno Vihinen1.   

Abstract

Next-generation sequencing methods have revolutionized the speed of generating variation information. Sequence data have a plethora of applications and will increasingly be used for disease diagnosis. Interpretation of the identified variants is usually not possible with experimental methods. This has caused a bottleneck that many computational methods aim at addressing. Fast and efficient methods for explaining the significance and mechanisms of detected variants are required for efficient precision/personalized medicine. Computational prediction methods have been developed in three areas to address the issue. There are generic tolerance (pathogenicity) predictors for filtering harmful variants. Gene/protein/disease-specific tools are available for some applications. Mechanism and effect-specific computer programs aim at explaining the consequences of variations. Here, we discuss the different types of predictors and their applications. We review available variation databases and prediction methods useful for variation interpretation. We discuss how the performance of methods is assessed and summarize existing assessment studies. A brief introduction is provided to the principles of the methods developed for variation interpretation as well as guidelines for how to choose the optimal tools and where the field is heading in the future.
© 2016 WILEY PERIODICALS, INC.

Keywords:  computational tools; mutation effect prediction; prediction methods; variation effect; variation interpretation; variation prediction

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26987456     DOI: 10.1002/humu.22987

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mutat        ISSN: 1059-7794            Impact factor:   4.878


  47 in total

1.  Functional analysis of rare variants in mismatch repair proteins augments results from computation-based predictive methods.

Authors:  Sanjeevani Arora; Peter J Huwe; Rahmat Sikder; Manali Shah; Amanda J Browne; Randy Lesh; Emmanuelle Nicolas; Sanat Deshpande; Michael J Hall; Roland L Dunbrack; Erica A Golemis
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 4.742

2.  ClinPred: Prediction Tool to Identify Disease-Relevant Nonsynonymous Single-Nucleotide Variants.

Authors:  Najmeh Alirezaie; Kristin D Kernohan; Taila Hartley; Jacek Majewski; Toby Dylan Hocking
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Missense variant pathogenicity predictors generalize well across a range of function-specific prediction challenges.

Authors:  Vikas Pejaver; Sean D Mooney; Predrag Radivojac
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 4.878

Review 4.  Biophysical and Mechanistic Models for Disease-Causing Protein Variants.

Authors:  Amelie Stein; Douglas M Fowler; Rasmus Hartmann-Petersen; Kresten Lindorff-Larsen
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 13.807

5.  BRCA1- and BRCA2-specific in silico tools for variant interpretation in the CAGI 5 ENIGMA challenge.

Authors:  Natàlia Padilla; Alejandro Moles-Fernández; Casandra Riera; Gemma Montalban; Selen Özkan; Lars Ootes; Sandra Bonache; Orland Díez; Sara Gutiérrez-Enríquez; Xavier de la Cruz
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 4.878

Review 6.  [Rational use of genetic tests in internal medicine : Possibilities and limitations of next generation sequencing diagnostics].

Authors:  M Elbracht; R Meyer; T Eggermann; I Kurth
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 0.743

7.  Exploring the use of molecular dynamics in assessing protein variants for phenotypic alterations.

Authors:  Aditi Garg; Debnath Pal
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2019-07-12       Impact factor: 4.878

8.  Prediction of impacts of mutations on protein structure and interactions: SDM, a statistical approach, and mCSM, using machine learning.

Authors:  Arun Prasad Pandurangan; Tom L Blundell
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 6.725

9.  Solution structure and functional investigation of human guanylate kinase reveals allosteric networking and a crucial role for the enzyme in cancer.

Authors:  Nazimuddin Khan; Parag P Shah; David Ban; Pablo Trigo-Mouriño; Marta G Carneiro; Lynn DeLeeuw; William L Dean; John O Trent; Levi J Beverly; Manfred Konrad; Donghan Lee; T Michael Sabo
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 10.  Genetics of Combined Pituitary Hormone Deficiency: Roadmap into the Genome Era.

Authors:  Qing Fang; Akima S George; Michelle L Brinkmeier; Amanda H Mortensen; Peter Gergics; Leonard Y M Cheung; Alexandre Z Daly; Adnan Ajmal; María Ines Pérez Millán; A Bilge Ozel; Jacob O Kitzman; Ryan E Mills; Jun Z Li; Sally A Camper
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 19.871

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.