Literature DB >> 26987413

Effect of pre- and post-column band broadening on the performance of high-speed chromatography columns under isocratic and gradient conditions.

Kim Vanderlinden1, Ken Broeckhoven1, Yoachim Vanderheyden1, Gert Desmet2.   

Abstract

We report on the results of an experimental and theoretical study of the effect of the extra-column band broadening (ECBB) on the performance of narrow-bore columns filled with the smallest particles that are currently commercially available. Emphasis is on the difference between the effect of ECBB under gradient and isocratic conditions, as well as on the ability to model and predict the ECBB effects using well-established band broadening expressions available from the theory of chromatography. The fine details and assumptions that need to be taken into account when using these expressions are discussed. The experiments showed that, the steeper the gradient, the more pronounced the extra-column band broadening losses become. Whereas the pre-column band broadening can in both isocratic and gradient elution be avoided by playing on the possibilities to focus the analytes on top of the column (e.g. by using the POISe injection method when running isocratic separations), the post-column extra-column band broadening is inescapable in both cases. Inducing extra-column band broadening by changing the inner diameter of the post-column tubing from 65 to 250 μm, we found that all peaks in the chromatogram are strongly affected (around a factor of 1.9 increase in relative peak width) when running steep gradients, while usually only the first eluting peak was affected in the isocratic mode or when running shallow gradients (factor 1.6-1.8 increase in relative peak width for the first eluting analyte).
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Connection tubing; Dispersion; Gradient elution; Modeling

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26987413     DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2016.03.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chromatogr A        ISSN: 0021-9673            Impact factor:   4.759


  5 in total

1.  Liquid chromatography above 20,000 PSI.

Authors:  Matthew J Sorensen; Brady G Anderson; Robert T Kennedy
Journal:  Trends Analyt Chem       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 12.296

2.  Comparison of Microflow and Analytical Flow Liquid Chromatography Coupled to Mass Spectrometry Global Metabolomics Methods Using a Urea Cycle Disorder Mouse Model.

Authors:  Sarah Geller; Harvey Lieberman; Adam J Belanger; Nelson S Yew; Alla Kloss; Alexander R Ivanov
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 4.466

3.  Peak broadening caused by using different micro-liquid chromatography detectors.

Authors:  Tobias Werres; Torsten C Schmidt; Thorsten Teutenberg
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 4.478

4.  Repeatability of gradient ultrahigh pressure liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry methods in instrument-controlled thermal environments.

Authors:  James P Grinias; Jenny-Marie T Wong; Robert T Kennedy
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 4.759

Review 5.  Are We Approaching a Speed Limit for the Chromatographic Separation of Enantiomers?

Authors:  Christopher J Welch
Journal:  ACS Cent Sci       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 14.553

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.