Kerrie Plant1,2, Leanne Babic1,3. 1. a The HEARing CRC, Melbourne , Australia . 2. b Cochlear Limited, Melbourne , Australia , and. 3. c Sydney Cochlear Implant Centre, Sydney , Australia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to quantify the benefit provided by having access to amplified acoustic hearing in the implanted ear for use in combination with contralateral acoustic hearing and the electrical stimulation provided by the cochlear implant. DESIGN: Measures of spatial and non-spatial hearing abilities were obtained to compare performance obtained with different configurations of acoustic hearing in combination with electrical stimulation. In the combined listening condition participants had access to bilateral acoustic hearing whereas the bimodal condition used acoustic hearing contralateral to the implanted ear only. Experience was provided with each of the listening conditions using a repeated-measures A-B-B-A experimental design. STUDY SAMPLE: Sixteen post-linguistically hearing-impaired adults participated in the study. RESULTS: Group mean benefit was obtained with use of the combined mode on measures of speech recognition in coincident speech in noise, localization ability, subjective ratings of real-world benefit, and musical sound quality ratings. CONCLUSIONS: Access to bilateral acoustic hearing after cochlear implantation provides significant benefit on a range of functional measures.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to quantify the benefit provided by having access to amplified acoustic hearing in the implanted ear for use in combination with contralateral acoustic hearing and the electrical stimulation provided by the cochlear implant. DESIGN: Measures of spatial and non-spatial hearing abilities were obtained to compare performance obtained with different configurations of acoustic hearing in combination with electrical stimulation. In the combined listening condition participants had access to bilateral acoustic hearing whereas the bimodal condition used acoustic hearing contralateral to the implanted ear only. Experience was provided with each of the listening conditions using a repeated-measures A-B-B-A experimental design. STUDY SAMPLE: Sixteen post-linguistically hearing-impaired adults participated in the study. RESULTS: Group mean benefit was obtained with use of the combined mode on measures of speech recognition in coincident speech in noise, localization ability, subjective ratings of real-world benefit, and musical sound quality ratings. CONCLUSIONS: Access to bilateral acoustic hearing after cochlear implantation provides significant benefit on a range of functional measures.
Authors: René H Gifford; Timothy J Davis; Linsey W Sunderhaus; Christine Menapace; Barbara Buck; Jillian Crosson; Lori O'Neill; Anne Beiter; Phil Segel Journal: Ear Hear Date: 2017 Sep/Oct Impact factor: 3.570
Authors: Jordan M Racca; Laura L Jones; Robert T Dwyer; Mary Ferguson; Linsey Sunderhaus; Linda J Hood; René H Gifford Journal: Am J Audiol Date: 2022-05-12 Impact factor: 1.636
Authors: Elizabeth L Perkins; Nauman F Manzoor; David S Haynes; Matthew O'Malley; René Gifford; Alejandro Rivas Journal: Otol Neurotol Date: 2021-07-01 Impact factor: 2.311
Authors: Elizabeth Perkins; Jaclyn Lee; Nauman Manzoor; Matthew O'Malley; Marc Bennett; Robert Labadie; Alejandro Rivas; David Haynes; René Gifford Journal: Otol Neurotol Date: 2021-07-01 Impact factor: 2.311