Literature DB >> 26986053

Factors Associated with the Use of Helicopter Inter-facility Transport of Trauma Patients to Tertiary Trauma Centers within an Organized Rural Trauma System.

Kenneth Stewart, Tabitha Garwe, Naresh Bhandari, Brandon Danford, Roxie Albrecht.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A review of the literature yielded little information regarding factors associated with the decision to use ground (GEMS) or helicopter (HEMS) emergency medical services for trauma patients transferred inter-facility. Furthermore, studies evaluating the impact of inter-facility transport mode on mortality have reported mixed findings. Since HEMS transport is generally reserved for more severely injured patients, this introduces indication bias, which may explain the mixed findings. Our objective was to identify factors at referring non-tertiary trauma centers (NTC) influencing transport mode decision.
METHODS: This was a case-control study of trauma patients transferred from a Level III or IV NTC to a tertiary trauma center (TTC) within 24-hours reported to the Oklahoma State Trauma Registry between 2005 and 2012. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine clinical and non-clinical factors associated with the decision to use HEMS.
RESULTS: A total of 7380 patients met the study eligibility. Of these, 2803(38%) were transported inter-facility by HEMS. Penetrating injury, prehospital EMS transport, severe torso injury, hypovolemic shock, and TBI were significant predictors (p<0.05) of HEMS use regardless of distance to a TTC. Association between HEMS use and male gender, Level IV NTC, and local ground EMS resources varied by distance from the TTC. Many HEMS transported patients had minor injuries and normal vital signs.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that while distance remains the most influential factor associated with HEMS use, significant differences exist in clinical and non-clinical factors between patients transported by HEMS versus GEMS. To ensure comparability of study groups, studies evaluating outcome differences between HEMS and GEMS should take factors determining transport mode into account. The findings will be used to develop propensity scores to balance baseline risk between GEMS and HEMS patients for use in subsequent studies of outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  air ambulances; trauma centers; wounds and injuries

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26986053      PMCID: PMC5012941          DOI: 10.3109/10903127.2016.1149650

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care        ISSN: 1090-3127            Impact factor:   3.077


  41 in total

1.  When is the helicopter faster? A comparison of helicopter and ground ambulance transport times.

Authors:  Marco A Diaz; Gregory W Hendey; Herbert G Bivins
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2005-01

Review 2.  Helicopter EMS transport outcomes literature: annotated review of articles published 2004-2006.

Authors:  Stephen H Thomas
Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care       Date:  2007 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 3.077

3.  Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group.

Authors:  R B D'Agostino
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-10-15       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  A propensity score analysis of prehospital factors and directness of transport of major trauma patients to a level I trauma center.

Authors:  Tabitha Garwe; Linda D Cowan; Barbara R Neas; John C Sacra; Roxie M Albrecht; Katy M Rich
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2011-01

5.  The cost of overtriage: more than one-third of low-risk injured patients were taken to major trauma centers.

Authors:  Craig D Newgard; Kristan Staudenmayer; Renee Y Hsia; N Clay Mann; Eileen M Bulger; James F Holmes; Ross Fleischman; Kyle Gorman; Jason Haukoos; K John McConnell
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 6.301

6.  The fastest route between two points is not always a straight line: An analysis of air and land transfer of nonpenetrating trauma patients.

Authors:  Paul J Karanicolas; Pankaj Bhatia; Joyce Williamson; Richard A Malthaner; Neil G Parry; Murray J Girotti; Daryl K Gray
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2006-08

7.  The impact of aeromedical response to patients with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Daniel P Davis; Jeremy Peay; Jennifer A Serrano; Colleen Buono; Gary M Vilke; Michael J Sise; Frank Kennedy; A Brent Eastman; Thomas Velky; David B Hoyt
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.721

8.  Emergency interhospital transport of the major trauma patient: air versus ground.

Authors:  C R Boyd; K M Corse; R C Campbell
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1989-06

9.  Association of direct helicopter versus ground transport and in-hospital mortality in trauma patients: a propensity score analysis.

Authors:  Kenneth E Stewart; Linda D Cowan; David M Thompson; John C Sacra; Roxie Albrecht
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.451

10.  A critical analysis of on-scene helicopter transport on survival in a statewide trauma system.

Authors:  C E Brathwaite; M Rosko; R McDowell; J Gallagher; J Proenca; M A Spott
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1998-07
View more
  2 in total

1.  Association of Interfacility Helicopter versus Ground Ambulance Transport and in-Hospital Mortality among Trauma Patients.

Authors:  Kenneth Stewart; Tabitha Garwe; Babawale Oluborode; Zoona Sarwar; Roxie M Albrecht
Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care       Date:  2020-10-05       Impact factor: 2.686

2.  HEMS inter-facility transfer: a case-mix analysis.

Authors:  Damien Di Rocco; Mathieu Pasquier; Eric Albrecht; Pierre-Nicolas Carron; Fabrice Dami
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2018-05-16
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.