Literature DB >> 16917457

The fastest route between two points is not always a straight line: An analysis of air and land transfer of nonpenetrating trauma patients.

Paul J Karanicolas1, Pankaj Bhatia, Joyce Williamson, Richard A Malthaner, Neil G Parry, Murray J Girotti, Daryl K Gray.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The distance beyond which helicopter transport is faster than ground for interfacility transfer of trauma patients has not been established. Our objective was to determine whether such a threshold exists.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted involving 243 patients transported by land and 139 patients by air from 13 sites during a 3-year period. Time intervals between critical events were compared for the two modes of transport at each site.
RESULTS: The time interval between the decision to transfer and the actual departure time was shorter for patients transferred by land from all sites studied (mean 41.3 versus 89.7 minutes, p < 0.001). The travel time was shorter by helicopter from all sites (mean 58.4 versus 78.9 minutes, p < 0.001). The time between the decision to transfer and the arrival at the trauma center was similar at most sites but faster by land overall (mean 120.3 versus 150.0 minutes, p = 0.014). No threshold was detected beyond which helicopter transport was superior.
CONCLUSIONS: Several factors other than the distance to be traveled determine the time required for interfacility transfer of trauma patients. A fixed distance threshold beyond which helicopter transport should be used does not exist. The decision as to which mode of transport to use for emergent trauma patient transfers should be based upon multiple factors including the distance traveled and ambulance availability, and must be individualized for each site that transfers patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16917457     DOI: 10.1097/01.ta.0000222974.31728.2a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma        ISSN: 0022-5282


  7 in total

1.  Factors Associated with the Use of Helicopter Inter-facility Transport of Trauma Patients to Tertiary Trauma Centers within an Organized Rural Trauma System.

Authors:  Kenneth Stewart; Tabitha Garwe; Naresh Bhandari; Brandon Danford; Roxie Albrecht
Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 3.077

2.  Transportation of pediatric femur fractures to a tertiary care center: a retrospective review.

Authors:  David Alexander; Joanna J Horstmann; Janet Walker; Vishwas Talwalkar; Henry Iwinski; Todd A Milbrandt
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2014

3.  Retrospective review of injury severity, interventions and outcomes among helicopter and nonhelicopter transport patients at a Level 1 urban trauma centre.

Authors:  R Scott Hannay; Amy D Wyrzykowski; Chad G Ball; Kevin Laupland; David V Feliciano
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  Helicopter EMS: Research Endpoints and Potential Benefits.

Authors:  Stephen H Thomas; Annette O Arthur
Journal:  Emerg Med Int       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 1.112

5.  HEMS inter-facility transfer: a case-mix analysis.

Authors:  Damien Di Rocco; Mathieu Pasquier; Eric Albrecht; Pierre-Nicolas Carron; Fabrice Dami
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2018-05-16

6.  Interfacility helicopter transfers for critically ill patients: always the right choice?

Authors:  Hasan Hawilo; Ravi Taneja
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 9.097

7.  Helicopter emergency medical service for time critical interfacility transfers of patients with cardiovascular emergencies.

Authors:  Lorenz Meuli; Alexander Zimmermann; Anna-Leonie Menges; Mario Tissi; Stefan Becker; Roland Albrecht; Urs Pietsch
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 2.953

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.