OBJECTIVE: Computer technology is used in various ways to deliver and enhance health care. It is therefore important to understand technology use patterns among underserved populations such as persons with serious mental illnesses who often experience inequitable care. METHODS: A survey was administered to 210 veterans with serious mental illnesses attending programs at a Department of Veterans Affairs community care center, with data collected on demographics, psychiatric diagnoses, access, use, and willingness to use cell phones, smart phones, Internet-based online social networking, and computerized therapies. Descriptive and multivariable analyses were conducted to determine utilization and interest in different technologies. RESULTS: Although 80.4% of the respondents reported owning a cellphone, only 30.3% reported they had a computer and 13.1% reported owning a smartphone. Although 56.7% reported using the Internet and 47.6% indicated they used e-mail, 68.6% of respondents reported that they were interested in using computer programs for mental health-related problems. Older, less educated veterans, and those with alcohol use disorders were less likely to use the Internet. Veterans who were White or had PTSD diagnoses were less willing to use any computerized therapy. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Lower rates of computer use, Internet, and cell phone technologies were observed among veterans with serious mental illnesses compared to general population surveys. Sociodemographic barriers likely impede access to technology among veterans with serious mental illnesses. Providing financial resources and associated education and training to veterans with serious mental illnesses could increase access to helpful technology-based interventions in a population that traditionally experiences service gaps. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).
OBJECTIVE: Computer technology is used in various ways to deliver and enhance health care. It is therefore important to understand technology use patterns among underserved populations such as persons with serious mental illnesses who often experience inequitable care. METHODS: A survey was administered to 210 veterans with serious mental illnesses attending programs at a Department of Veterans Affairs community care center, with data collected on demographics, psychiatric diagnoses, access, use, and willingness to use cell phones, smart phones, Internet-based online social networking, and computerized therapies. Descriptive and multivariable analyses were conducted to determine utilization and interest in different technologies. RESULTS: Although 80.4% of the respondents reported owning a cellphone, only 30.3% reported they had a computer and 13.1% reported owning a smartphone. Although 56.7% reported using the Internet and 47.6% indicated they used e-mail, 68.6% of respondents reported that they were interested in using computer programs for mental health-related problems. Older, less educated veterans, and those with alcohol use disorders were less likely to use the Internet. Veterans who were White or had PTSD diagnoses were less willing to use any computerized therapy. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Lower rates of computer use, Internet, and cell phone technologies were observed among veterans with serious mental illnesses compared to general population surveys. Sociodemographic barriers likely impede access to technology among veterans with serious mental illnesses. Providing financial resources and associated education and training to veterans with serious mental illnesses could increase access to helpful technology-based interventions in a population that traditionally experiences service gaps. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).
Authors: Steven K Dobscha; Lauren M Denneson; Maura K Pisciotta; Donald S Bourne; Jason I Chen; David Philipps-Moses; Susan S Woods Journal: JAMIA Open Date: 2018-04-25
Authors: Lauren M Denneson; Jason I Chen; Maura Pisciotta; Anais Tuepker; Steven K Dobscha Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2018-03-01 Impact factor: 4.157
Authors: Jörn Conell; Rita Bauer; Tasha Glenn; Martin Alda; Raffaella Ardau; Bernhard T Baune; Michael Berk; Yuly Bersudsky; Amy Bilderbeck; Alberto Bocchetta; Letizia Bossini; Angela Marianne Paredes Castro; Eric Yat Wo Cheung; Caterina Chillotti; Sabine Choppin; Maria Del Zompo; Rodrigo Dias; Seetal Dodd; Anne Duffy; Bruno Etain; Andrea Fagiolini; Julie Garnham; John Geddes; Jonas Gildebro; Ana Gonzalez-Pinto; Guy M Goodwin; Paul Grof; Hirohiko Harima; Stefanie Hassel; Chantal Henry; Diego Hidalgo-Mazzei; Vaisnvy Kapur; Girish Kunigiri; Beny Lafer; Chun Lam; Erik Roj Larsen; Ute Lewitzka; Rasmus Licht; Anne Hvenegaard Lund; Blazej Misiak; Patryk Piotrowski; Scott Monteith; Rodrigo Munoz; Takako Nakanotani; René E Nielsen; Claire O'Donovan; Yasushi Okamura; Yamima Osher; Andreas Reif; Philipp Ritter; Janusz K Rybakowski; Kemal Sagduyu; Brett Sawchuk; Elon Schwartz; Ângela Miranda Scippa; Claire Slaney; Ahmad Hatim Sulaiman; Kirsi Suominen; Aleksandra Suwalska; Peter Tam; Yoshitaka Tatebayashi; Leonardo Tondo; Eduard Vieta; Maj Vinberg; Biju Viswanath; Julia Volkert; Mark Zetin; Iñaki Zorrilla; Peter C Whybrow; Michael Bauer Journal: Int J Bipolar Disord Date: 2016-08-24
Authors: Michael Bauer; Tasha Glenn; John Geddes; Michael Gitlin; Paul Grof; Lars V Kessing; Scott Monteith; Maria Faurholt-Jepsen; Emanuel Severus; Peter C Whybrow Journal: Int J Bipolar Disord Date: 2020-01-10
Authors: Jacqueline M Ferguson; Josephine Jacobs; Maria Yefimova; Liberty Greene; Leonie Heyworth; Donna M Zulman Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2021-03-01 Impact factor: 4.497