Literature DB >> 26985448

Characterization of molecular and cellular phenotypes associated with a heterozygous CNTNAP2 deletion using patient-derived hiPSC neural cells.

Inkyu S Lee1, Claudia M B Carvalho2, Panagiotis Douvaras3, Seok-Man Ho1, Brigham J Hartley1, Luciana W Zuccherato2, Ian G Ladran1, Arthur J Siegel4, Shane McCarthy5, Dheeraj Malhotra6, Jonathan Sebat7, Judith Rapoport8, Valentina Fossati3, James R Lupski9, Deborah L Levy10, Kristen J Brennand1.   

Abstract

Neurodevelopmental disorders, such as autism spectrum disorders (ASD) and schizophrenia (SZ), are complex disorders with a high degree of heritability. Genetic studies have identified several candidate genes associated with these disorders, including contactin-associated protein-like 2 (CNTNAP2). Traditionally, in animal models or in vitro, the function of CNTNAP2 has been studied by genetic deletion or transcriptional knockdown, which reduce the expression of the entire gene; however, it remains unclear whether the mutations identified in clinical settings are sufficient to alter CNTNAP2 expression in human neurons. Here, using human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) derived from two individuals with a large (289kb) and heterozygous deletion in CNTNAP2 (affecting exons 14-15) and discordant clinical outcomes, we have characterized CNTNAP2 expression patterns in hiPSC neural progenitor cells (NPCs), two independent populations of hiPSC-derived neurons and hiPSC-derived oligodendrocyte precursor cells (OPCs). First, we observed exon-specific changes in CNTNAP2 expression in both carriers; although the expression of exons 14-15 is significantly decreased, the expression of other exons is upregulated. Second, we observed significant differences in patterns of allele-specific expression in CNTNAP2 carriers that were consistent with clinical outcome. Third, we observed a robust neural migration phenotype that correlated with diagnosis and exon- and allele-specific CNTNAP2 expression patterns, but not with genotype. In all, our data highlight the importance of considering the nature, location and regulation of mutated alleles when attempting to connect GWAS studies to gene function.

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 26985448      PMCID: PMC4789165          DOI: 10.1038/npjschz.2015.19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NPJ Schizophr        ISSN: 2334-265X


Structural variants and single-nucleotide variants involving Contactin-associated protein-like 2 (CNTNAP2) have been implicated in neurodevelopmental disorders, such as autism spectrum disorders, schizophrenia (SZ), epilepsy, language disorders, and cognitive impairments,[1] but the relative risk associated with heterozygous mutations is unresolved.[2] CNTNAP2 protein functions in axon guidance, dendritic arborization, spine development, and organization of myelinated axons (reviewed in ref. 1); complete loss of Cntnap2 results in impaired migration of cortical projection neurons, reduced GABAergic neurons, and decreased neural synchrony in mice.[3] Here, using human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) derived from two related individuals with a large (289.3 kb) and heterozygous deletion in CNTNAP2 and discordant clinical phenotypes, we have characterized CNTNAP2 expression patterns in hiPSC neural progenitor cells (NPCs), two independent populations of hiPSC-derived neurons, and hiPSC-derived oligodendrocyte precursor cells (OPCs). Fibroblast samples were obtained from a female proband (DL7078), who met DSM-IV criteria for a diagnosis of schizo-affective disorder (depressed subtype) (SZ), and both parents (DL8735, DL5535); the proband and her clinically unaffected father are carriers (Figure 1a and Supplementary methods). The CNTNAP2 deletion was initially identified in patient lymphocytes using the Nimblegen HD 2 platform and was subsequently independently confirmed using a high-density custom-designed Agilent array comparative genomic hybridization in DNA samples derived from individual leucocytes, Epstein–Barr virus-transformed lymphoblastoid cell lines, and fibroblasts (Figure 1b). Long-range PCR and Sanger sequencing narrowed down deletion breakpoint junctions; these map to introns, leading to loss of exons 14–15 in the affected allele (Figure 1c).
Figure 1

Description of CNTNAP2 family trio and generation of subject-specific hiPSCs, NPCs, and neurons. (a) Pedigree of the family trio. The proband ‘SZ Daughter+/−’ has a heterozygous CNTNAP2 deletion that was inherited from her unaffected carrier Father+/−. (b) CNV identification of chromosome 7 deletion (7q35q36.1) in CNTNAP2 in unaffected carrier Father+/− (top) and affected proband SZ Daughter+/−(bottom). (c) Schematic of CNTNAP2 gene and mapping of breakpoint at chromosome 7 (147518609–147807856 hg19). (d) Top. hiPSCs express NANOG (green) and TRA-1-60 (red). DAPI (blue). ×40, bar=100 μm. Middle. hiPSC NPCs express NESTIN (red) and SOX2 (green). DAPI (blue). ×100, scale bar=100 μm. Bottom. hiPSC neurons express βIII-TUBULIN (red) and the dendritic marker MAP2AB (green). DAPI (blue). 100×, scale bar=100 μm. DAPI, 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole.

Non-integrating sendai viral reprogramming methods were used to generate three hiPSC lines from each member of the trio, as well as one hiPSC line each from five unrelated psychiatrically healthy controls with no DSM-IV diagnosis. All hiPSC lines were validated by long-term expansion beyond 10 passages, immunohistochemistry for pluripotency markers (Figure 1d, top), and normal karyotype (data not shown). Except where otherwise noted, experiments represent averaged results from three hiPSC lines each from the non-carrier Mother+/+, the unaffected carrier Father+/−, and the SZ Daughter+/−, as well as one hiPSC line from each of five ethnicity-matched unrelated controls (three males; two females). hiPSCs were differentiated by dual SMAD inhibition[4] of embryoid bodies to yield neural rosettes, which were subsequently expanded as NPCs[5] (Figure 1d, middle); neurons were generated by either 6 weeks of directed differentiation to a forebrain neuronal fate[5,6] or rapid 2-week lentiviral Ngn2 induction to glutamatergic neurons[7] (Figure 1d, bottom). CNTNAP2 has eight transcript variants; the full-length transcript is comprised of 24 exons (NM_014141). We performed a series of qPCR experiments to determine exon-specific and allelic-specific expression differences due to the presence of the deletion (Figure 2a). Full-length CNTNAP2 expression was low in fibroblasts (Figure 2b) and hiPSCs (Figure 2c). In NPCs, the SZ Daughter+/− and unaffected carrier Father+/− showed a downward trend in expression of deleted exons 14–15; unexpectedly, we detected significantly increased expression of exons 23–24 in both carriers, SZ Daughter+/− (P=0.0185) and Father+/− (P=0.0190) (Figure 2d), suggesting that the presence of the deletion may alter the transcript expression in NPCs. Interestingly, in hiPSC-derived 6-week-old forebrain neurons, we also observed a significantly increased CNTNAP2 expression of exons 2–3 (P=0.0016) and exons 23–24 (P=0.0030) only in the SZ proband (Figure 2e), again suggesting that the deletion leads to increased full-length transcript expression in a phenotype-specific way. Finally, in 2-week-old Ngn2-induced neurons, in a population that had reached electrophysiological maturity, we observed significantly decreased expression of the deleted exons 14–15 (P=0.0387) in the SZ Daughter+/− only, relative to five unrelated controls (Figure 2f).
Figure 2

Exon- and allele-specific CNTNAP2 expression in hiPSC-derived NPCs, neurons and OPCs correlates with aberrant migration in hiPSC forebrain NPCs. (a) Schematic illustrating splicing patterns of eight known CNTNAP2 transcript variants as well as protein domains. CNTNAP2 has eight transcript variants: four protein-coding transcripts (CNTNAP2-001, CNTNAP2-003, CNTNAP2-005, and CNTNAP2-006), three processed transcripts (CNTNAP2-002, CNTNAP2-008, and CNTNAP2-009), and one retained intron (CNTNAP2-007). CNTNAP2-001 is the full-length transcript comprised of 24 exons. Filled rectangles denote protein-coding regions, unfilled rectangles denote untranslated regions (5′ and 3′ UTRs; processed transcripts; retained introns); round rectangles denote protein domains. Red rectangles denote exons 14 and 15, which are missing in the deletion lines. Green primers denote those used in RT qPCR experiments; purple primers denote those used in allele-specific PCR. Exon-specific CNTNAP2 expression in patient fibroblasts and hiPSCs. Exon-specific expression patterns (exons 2–3, 14–15, 23–24) of five unrelated controls, SZ Daughter+/−, carrier Father+/−, and unaffected Mother+/+ in primary human fibroblasts (b) and hiPSCs (c). (d–f) Exon-specific expression patterns (exons 2–3, 14–15, 23–24) of five unrelated controls, SZ Daughter+/−, carrier Father+/−, and unaffected Mother+/+ in hiPSC-derived forebrain NPCs (d), 6-week-old hiPSC-derived forebrain neurons (e), and 2-week-old hiPSC-derived NPC Ngn2-induced neurons (f). (g) Allele-specific expression patterns of exons 13–16 in wild-type (517 bp) and deletion (232 bp) CNTNAP2 alleles from patient-derived Ngn2-induced neurons. (h–j) Exon- and allele-specific CNTNAP2 expression in hiPSC-derived OPCs. Representative images of hiPSC-derived OPCs. Top: live cells stained for OPC marker O4 shown in green. Bottom: immunohistochemical staining of fixed cells for myelin basic protein in red, DAPI-stained nuclei in blue. bar=200 μm (h). Exon-specific expression patterns (exons 2–3, 14–15, 23–24) of one hiPSC line unrelated control, SZ Daughter+/−, carrier Father+/−, and unaffected Mother+/+ in hiPSC-derived forebrain OPCs (i). Allele-specific expression patterns of exons 13–16 in wild type (517 bp) and deletion (232 bp) CNTNAP2 alleles from patient-derived OPCs (j). (k–m) Aberrant migration in hiPSC forebrain NPCs correlates with diagnosis, not CNTNAP2 genotype. Representative images of hiPSC forebrain NPC neurosphere outgrowth assay. The average distance between the radius of the inner neurosphere (dense aggregate of nuclei) and outer circumference of cells (white dashed line) was calculated. DAPI-stained nuclei (blue). ×20; bar=200 μm (k). Average radial neurosphere migration by CNTNAP2 carrier and non-carrier hiPSC-derived forebrain NPCs. Each data point represents the average radial migration of eight neurospheres (l). Pearson’s correlation analysis of exon-specific CNTNAP2 expression (exons 2–3, left; exons 14–15, center; exons 23–34, right) and average radial neurosphere migration. (One extreme outlier of CNTNAP2 exon 14–15 expression was excluded; with its inclusion, r=0.5427, P=0.0049) (m) In all NPC and neuron experiments, results represent averaged results from three hiPSC lines each derived from the non-carrier Mother+/+, the unaffected carrier Father+/−, and the SZ Daughter+/−, as well as one hiPSC line from each of five unrelated controls. OPC experiments represent averaged results from two independent differentiations of OPCs from one hiPSC line each, derived from the non-carrier Mother+/+, the unaffected carrier Father+/−, and the SZ Daughter+/−, as well as one hiPSC line from one unrelated control. CF, coagulation factor 5/8 C-terminal type domain; LG, laminin G domain; E, epidermal growth factor-like domain; FBG, fibrinogen-like domain; NSG, neurexin/syndecan/glycophorin C domain; TM, transmembrane domain B-C. Error bars are s.e.; *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001, ****P<0.0001. DAPI, 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole.

We assayed neuronal allele-specific expression of CNTNAP2 from the unaffected and deleted alleles by qPCR with primers targeting exons 13–16 on Ngn2-induced neurons; amplified CNTNAP2 cDNA is either a 517 bp (wild type) or a 232 bp (deletion) amplicon. Expression from the intact allele (517 bp) was decreased and the deleted allele (232 bp) was increased in SZ Daughter+/−, relative to unrelated controls; the unaffected carrier Father+/− showed expression from both the intact allele (517 bp) and the deleted allele (232 bp), albeit at lower levels (Figure 2g). We generated OPCs from hiPSCs,[8] and analyzed cultures at day 64, comprised of ~50% O4+ late OPCs (15% O4+/MBP+ mature oligodendrocytes) as well as ~15% astrocytes and ~20% neurons (Figure 2h). Expression of deleted exons 14–15 was significantly decreased in both the SZ Daughter+/− (P<0.0001) and the unaffected carrier Father+/− (P<0.0001) relative to one unrelated control (Figure 2i). Here too, the SZ Daughter+/− expressed predominantly the mutant allele, whereas the unaffected carrier Father+/− expressed primarily the wild-type allele (Figure 2j). Neural migration can be quantified using a neurosphere migration assay, which measures radial migration of NPCs outward from a central neurosphere; aberrantly reduced migration correlates with a SZ diagnosis.[5] The SZ Daughter+/− had significantly decreased migration (255.6±55.3 μm) relative to five controls (512.0±111.2 μm) (P=0.0004) (Figure 2k and l); neither the unaffected carrier Father+/− (551.5±56.1 μm) nor the non-carrier Mother+/+ (650.4±132.6 μm) showed aberrant migration. Migration and expression of exon 2–3 (P=0.3779) were not significantly correlated, but migration and expression of exons 14–15 (r=0.6959, P=0.0083) and exons 23–24 (r=−0.8230, P=0.003) were significantly correlated (Figure 2m). Finally, both preferential expression of the deleted CNTNAP2 allele (Figure 2g,j) and significantly reduced neural migration (Figure 2k,l) occurred only in the SZ Daughter+/−. This study, although necessarily preliminary owing to its observational nature and the inclusion of just one family trio, reveals insights into the complicated genetics underlying SZ, and warrants replication across additional family trios with discordantly inherited genetic lesions. Future studies will need to distinguish between at least three possibilities suggested by these data: (1) the carrier Father+/− has protective alleles not inherited by the affected daughter; (2) the SZ Daughter+/− has additional deleterious alleles, either de novo or inherited from her mother, not present in her father; (3) CNTNAP2 structural deletions present with incomplete penetrance and variable expressivity, owing to the functional consequences of expressing variable levels of the mutated CNTNAP2 allele. Our findings are consistent with a previous characterization of patient lymphocytes in an unrelated pedigree, in which a CNTNAP2 autism spectrum disorder case exhibited significantly decreased CNTNAP2 expression relative to the unaffected carrier mother (the carrier mother, in turn, showed significantly decreased CNTNAP2 expression relative to the wild-type father and controls).[9] In cases involving intragenic losses such as this one, abnormal alternative splicing and isoform dysregulation has already been posited to contribute to variable expressivity of CNTNAP2 (reviewed in ref. 10). Moreover, preferential expression of either the mutant or wild-type allele is another possible explanation for the incomplete penetrance of SZ risk genes (reviewed in ref. 11); indeed a study of allele-biased expression in hiPSC-derived neurons identified putative SZ and autism spectrum disorder-associated genes, including CNTNAP2, to be robustly implicated in allele-biased expression.[12] Although the mechanistic effectors remain unidentified, here we present evidence that differences in both exon- and allele-specific expression may have a critical role in SZ predisposition.

Data deposition

All case and control hiPSCs will be deposited with the NIMH Center for Collaborative Studies of Mental Disorders at RUCDR. Reprints and permissions information are available at http://www.nature.com/npjschz.
  11 in total

Review 1.  CNVs: harbingers of a rare variant revolution in psychiatric genetics.

Authors:  Dheeraj Malhotra; Jonathan Sebat
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Reduced transcript expression of genes affected by inherited and de novo CNVs in autism.

Authors:  Alex S Nord; Wendy Roeb; Diane E Dickel; Tom Walsh; Mary Kusenda; Kristen Lewis O'Connor; Dheeraj Malhotra; Shane E McCarthy; Sunday M Stray; Susan M Taylor; Jonathan Sebat; Bryan King; Mary-Claire King; Jon M McClellan
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 3.  Connecting the CNTNAP2 Networks with Neurodevelopmental Disorders.

Authors:  Martin Poot
Journal:  Mol Syndromol       Date:  2015-02-03

Review 4.  Shining a light on CNTNAP2: complex functions to complex disorders.

Authors:  Pedro Rodenas-Cuadrado; Joses Ho; Sonja C Vernes
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 4.246

5.  Rapid single-step induction of functional neurons from human pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Yingsha Zhang; Changhui Pak; Yan Han; Henrik Ahlenius; Zhenjie Zhang; Soham Chanda; Samuele Marro; Christopher Patzke; Claudio Acuna; Jason Covy; Wei Xu; Nan Yang; Tamas Danko; Lu Chen; Marius Wernig; Thomas C Südhof
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Efficient generation of myelinating oligodendrocytes from primary progressive multiple sclerosis patients by induced pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Panagiotis Douvaras; Jing Wang; Matthew Zimmer; Stephanie Hanchuk; Melanie A O'Bara; Saud Sadiq; Fraser J Sim; James Goldman; Valentina Fossati
Journal:  Stem Cell Reports       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 7.765

7.  Phenotypic differences in hiPSC NPCs derived from patients with schizophrenia.

Authors:  K Brennand; J N Savas; Y Kim; N Tran; A Simone; K Hashimoto-Torii; K G Beaumont; H J Kim; A Topol; I Ladran; M Abdelrahim; B Matikainen-Ankney; S-h Chao; M Mrksich; P Rakic; G Fang; B Zhang; J R Yates; F H Gage
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 15.992

8.  No evidence for association of autism with rare heterozygous point mutations in Contactin-Associated Protein-Like 2 (CNTNAP2), or in Other Contactin-Associated Proteins or Contactins.

Authors:  John D Murdoch; Abha R Gupta; Stephan J Sanders; Michael F Walker; John Keaney; Thomas V Fernandez; Michael T Murtha; Samuel Anyanwu; Gordon T Ober; Melanie J Raubeson; Nicholas M DiLullo; Natalie Villa; Zainabdul Waqar; Catherine Sullivan; Luis Gonzalez; A Jeremy Willsey; So-Yeon Choe; Benjamin M Neale; Mark J Daly; Matthew W State
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  Highly efficient neural conversion of human ES and iPS cells by dual inhibition of SMAD signaling.

Authors:  Stuart M Chambers; Christopher A Fasano; Eirini P Papapetrou; Mark Tomishima; Michel Sadelain; Lorenz Studer
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 54.908

10.  Allele-biased expression in differentiating human neurons: implications for neuropsychiatric disorders.

Authors:  Mingyan Lin; Anastasia Hrabovsky; Erika Pedrosa; Tao Wang; Deyou Zheng; Herbert M Lachman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  26 in total

1.  Using Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells to Investigate Complex Genetic Psychiatric Disorders.

Authors:  Stephanie J Temme; Brady J Maher; Kimberly M Christian
Journal:  Curr Behav Neurosci Rep       Date:  2016-10-14

Review 2.  Modeling schizophrenia pathogenesis using patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs).

Authors:  Haneul Noh; Zhicheng Shao; Joseph T Coyle; Sangmi Chung
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 5.187

3.  When Recessive Genes Mutate to Dominant Gene Action.

Authors:  Martin Poot
Journal:  Mol Syndromol       Date:  2016-09-14

4.  Intragenic Deletions May Involve Enhancer Sequences and Alter CNTNAP2 Expression.

Authors:  Martin Poot
Journal:  Mol Syndromol       Date:  2018-05-09

5.  Disconnecting CNTNAP2.

Authors:  Martin Poot
Journal:  Mol Syndromol       Date:  2016-06-17

6.  Mutations in Mediator Complex Genes CDK8, MED12, MED13, and MEDL13 Mediate Overlapping Developmental Syndromes.

Authors:  Martin Poot
Journal:  Mol Syndromol       Date:  2019-08-16

Review 7.  Intragenic CNTNAP2 Deletions: A Bridge Too Far?

Authors:  Martin Poot
Journal:  Mol Syndromol       Date:  2017-02-10

8.  Variable Penetrance of the 15q11.2 BP1-BP2 Microduplication in a Family with Cognitive and Language Impairment.

Authors:  Antonio Benítez-Burraco; Montserrat Barcos-Martínez; Isabel Espejo-Portero; Salud Jiménez-Romero
Journal:  Mol Syndromol       Date:  2017-04-14

Review 9.  Genetics of Schizophrenia: Ready to Translate?

Authors:  Claire Foley; Aiden Corvin; Shigeki Nakagome
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 5.285

10.  Gene expression elucidates functional impact of polygenic risk for schizophrenia.

Authors:  Menachem Fromer; Panos Roussos; Solveig K Sieberts; Jessica S Johnson; David H Kavanagh; Thanneer M Perumal; Douglas M Ruderfer; Edwin C Oh; Aaron Topol; Hardik R Shah; Lambertus L Klei; Robin Kramer; Dalila Pinto; Zeynep H Gümüş; A Ercument Cicek; Kristen K Dang; Andrew Browne; Cong Lu; Lu Xie; Ben Readhead; Eli A Stahl; Jianqiu Xiao; Mahsa Parvizi; Tymor Hamamsy; John F Fullard; Ying-Chih Wang; Milind C Mahajan; Jonathan M J Derry; Joel T Dudley; Scott E Hemby; Benjamin A Logsdon; Konrad Talbot; Towfique Raj; David A Bennett; Philip L De Jager; Jun Zhu; Bin Zhang; Patrick F Sullivan; Andrew Chess; Shaun M Purcell; Leslie A Shinobu; Lara M Mangravite; Hiroyoshi Toyoshiba; Raquel E Gur; Chang-Gyu Hahn; David A Lewis; Vahram Haroutunian; Mette A Peters; Barbara K Lipska; Joseph D Buxbaum; Eric E Schadt; Keisuke Hirai; Kathryn Roeder; Kristen J Brennand; Nicholas Katsanis; Enrico Domenici; Bernie Devlin; Pamela Sklar
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 24.884

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.