Literature DB >> 26984788

Harmonizing routinely collected health information for strengthening quality management in health systems: requirements and practice.

Birgit Prodinger1, Alan Tennant2, Gerold Stucki3, Alarcos Cieza4, Tevfik Bedirhan Üstün5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to specify the requirements of an architecture to serve as the foundation for standardized reporting of health information and to provide an exemplary application of this architecture.
METHODS: The World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) served as the conceptual framework. Methods to establish content comparability were the ICF Linking Rules. The Rasch measurement model, as a special case of additive conjoint measurement, which satisfies the required criteria for fundamental measurement, allowed for the development of a common metric foundation for measurement unit conversion. Secondary analysis of data from the North Yorkshire Survey was used to illustrate these methods. Patients completed three instruments and the items were linked to the ICF. The Rasch measurement model was applied, first to each scale, and then to items across scales which were linked to a common domain.
RESULTS: Based on the linking of items to the ICF, the majority of items were grouped into two domains, Mobility and Self-care. Analysis of the individual scales and of items linked to a common domain across scales satisfied the requirements of the Rasch measurement model. The measurement unit conversion between items from the three instruments linked to the Mobility and Self-care domains, respectively, was demonstrated.
CONCLUSIONS: The realization of an ICF-based architecture for information on patients' functioning enables harmonization of health information while allowing clinicians and researchers to continue using their existing instruments. This architecture will facilitate access to comprehensive and consistently reported health information to serve as the foundation for informed decision-making.
© The Author(s) 2016.

Entities:  

Keywords:  decision making; health classifications; health status measurement; information standards; quality management

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26984788     DOI: 10.1177/1355819616636411

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy        ISSN: 1355-8196


  5 in total

1.  Linking the Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS) to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health.

Authors:  S Traversoni; J Jutai; C Fundarò; S Salvini; R Casale; A Giardini
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Content comparison of the Spinal Cord Injury Model System Database to the ICF Generic Sets and Core Sets for spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Roxanne Maritz; Kannit Pongpipatpaiboon; John L Melvin; Daniel E Graves; Birgit Prodinger
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 2.772

3.  Parents' Assessments of Disability in Their Children Using World Health Organization International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, Child and Youth Version Joined Body Functions and Activity Codes Related to Everyday Life.

Authors:  Niels Ove Illum; Kim Oren Gradel
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Pediatr       Date:  2017-06-19

4.  A Rasch-Based Comparison of the Functional Independence Measure and Spinal Cord Independence Measure for Outcome and Quality in the Rehabilitation of Persons with Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Roxanne Maritz; Carolina Fellinghauer; Mirjam Brach; Armin Curt; Hans Peter Gmünder; Maren Hopfe; Margret Hund-Georgiadis; Xavier Jordan; Anke Scheel-Sailer; Gerold Stucki
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Measuring Work-Related Functioning Using the Work Rehabilitation Questionnaire (WORQ).

Authors:  Monika E Finger; Reuben Escorpizo; Alan Tennant
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.