Alarcos Cieza1,2,3, Nora Fayed4,5, Jerome Bickenbach3,6,7, Birgit Prodinger3,6,7. 1. a Faculty of Social and Human Sciences, School of Psychology , University of Southampton , Southampton , UK. 2. b Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology - IBE, Chair for Public Health and Health Services Research, Research Unit for Biopsychosocial Health , Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) , Munich , Germany. 3. c Swiss Paraplegic Research , Nottwil , Switzerland. 4. d University Health Network , Toronto , Canada. 5. e CanChild Centre for Child Disability Research , McMaster University , Hamilton , Canada. 6. f Department of Health Sciences and HealthPolicy , University of Lucerne , Lucerne , Switzerland. 7. g ICF Research Branch a Cooperation Partner within the WHO Collaborating Centre for the Family of International Classifications in Germany (at DIMDI) , Nottwil , Switzerland.
Abstract
Purpose The content of and methods for collecting health information often vary across settings and challenge the comparability of health information across time, individuals or populations. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) contains an exhaustive set of categories of information which constitutes a unified and consistent language of human functioning suitable as a reference for comparing health information. Methods and results In two earlier papers, we have proposed rules for linking existing health information to the ICF. Further refinements to these existing ICF Linking Rules are presented in this paper to enhance the transparency of the linking process. The refinements involve preparing information for linking, perspectives from which information is collected and the categorization of response options. Issues regarding the linking of information not covered or unspecified within the ICF are also revisited in this paper. Conclusion: The ICF Linking Rules are valuable for enhancing comparability of health information to ensure that information is available in a consistent manner to serve as a foundation for evidence-based decision-making across all levels of health systems. The refinements presented in this paper enhance transparency in, and ultimately reliability of the process of, linking health information to the ICF. Implications for Rehabilitation The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) constitutes a unified and consistent language of human functioning suitable as a reference for comparing health information. Comparability of information is essential to ensure that the widest range of information is available in a consistent manner for any decision-maker at all levels of the health system. The refined ICF Linking Rules presented in this article outline the method to establish comparability of health information based on the ICF.
Purpose The content of and methods for collecting health information often vary across settings and challenge the comparability of health information across time, individuals or populations. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) contains an exhaustive set of categories of information which constitutes a unified and consistent language of human functioning suitable as a reference for comparing health information. Methods and results In two earlier papers, we have proposed rules for linking existing health information to the ICF. Further refinements to these existing ICF Linking Rules are presented in this paper to enhance the transparency of the linking process. The refinements involve preparing information for linking, perspectives from which information is collected and the categorization of response options. Issues regarding the linking of information not covered or unspecified within the ICF are also revisited in this paper. Conclusion: The ICF Linking Rules are valuable for enhancing comparability of health information to ensure that information is available in a consistent manner to serve as a foundation for evidence-based decision-making across all levels of health systems. The refinements presented in this paper enhance transparency in, and ultimately reliability of the process of, linking health information to the ICF. Implications for Rehabilitation The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) constitutes a unified and consistent language of human functioning suitable as a reference for comparing health information. Comparability of information is essential to ensure that the widest range of information is available in a consistent manner for any decision-maker at all levels of the health system. The refined ICF Linking Rules presented in this article outline the method to establish comparability of health information based on the ICF.
Entities:
Keywords:
Comparability; International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health; health; information systems; outcome research; semantic interoperability
Authors: Kristin M Conway; Emma Ciafaloni; Dennis Matthews; Chris Westfield; Kathy James; Pangaja Paramsothy; Paul A Romitti Journal: Disabil Rehabil Date: 2017-04-11 Impact factor: 3.033