Nitima Saksobhavivat1, Kathirkamanathan Shanmuganathan2, Alexis R Boscak3, Clint W Sliker3, Deborah M Stein4, Uttam K Bodanapally3, Krystal Archer-Arroyo3, Lisa A Miller3, Thorsten R Fleiter3, Melvin T Alexander3, Stuart E Mirvis3, Thomas M Scalea4. 1. Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Radiology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, 270 Rama VI Rd., Ratchathewi, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand. 2. Department of Diagnostic Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 22 S. Greene Street, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA. kshanmuganathan@umm.edu. 3. Department of Diagnostic Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 22 S. Greene Street, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA. 4. R. Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 22 S. Greene Street, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Neither the performance of CT in diagnosing penetrating gastrointestinal injury nor its ability to discriminate patients requiring either observation or surgery has been determined. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective, single-institutional observational study of patients with penetrating injury to the torso who underwent CT. Based on CT signs, reviewers determined the presence of a gastrointestinal injury and the need for surgery or observation. The primary outcome measures were operative findings and clinical follow-up. CT results were compared with the primary outcome measures. RESULTS: Of one hundred and seventy-one patients (72 gunshot wounds, 99 stab wounds; age range, 18-57 years; median age, 28 years) with penetrating torso trauma who underwent CT, 45 % were followed by an operation and 55 % by clinical follow up. Thirty-five patients had a gastrointestinal injury at surgery. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CT for diagnosing a gastrointestinal injury for all patients were each 91 %, and for predicting the need for surgery, they were 94 %, 93 %, 93 %, respectively. Among the 3 % of patients who failed observation, 1 % had a gastrointestinal injury. CONCLUSION: CT is a useful technique to diagnose gastrointestinal injury following penetrating torso injury. CT can help discriminate patients requiring observation or surgery. KEY POINTS: • The most sensitive sign is wound tract extending up to gastrointestinal wall. • The most accurate sign is gastrointestinal wall thickening. • Triple-contrast CT is a useful technique to diagnose gastrointestinal injury. • Triple-contrast CT helps to discriminate patients requiring observation and surgery.
PURPOSE: Neither the performance of CT in diagnosing penetrating gastrointestinal injury nor its ability to discriminate patients requiring either observation or surgery has been determined. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective, single-institutional observational study of patients with penetrating injury to the torso who underwent CT. Based on CT signs, reviewers determined the presence of a gastrointestinal injury and the need for surgery or observation. The primary outcome measures were operative findings and clinical follow-up. CT results were compared with the primary outcome measures. RESULTS: Of one hundred and seventy-one patients (72 gunshot wounds, 99 stab wounds; age range, 18-57 years; median age, 28 years) with penetrating torso trauma who underwent CT, 45 % were followed by an operation and 55 % by clinical follow up. Thirty-five patients had a gastrointestinal injury at surgery. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CT for diagnosing a gastrointestinal injury for all patients were each 91 %, and for predicting the need for surgery, they were 94 %, 93 %, 93 %, respectively. Among the 3 % of patients who failed observation, 1 % had a gastrointestinal injury. CONCLUSION: CT is a useful technique to diagnose gastrointestinal injury following penetrating torso injury. CT can help discriminate patients requiring observation or surgery. KEY POINTS: • The most sensitive sign is wound tract extending up to gastrointestinal wall. • The most accurate sign is gastrointestinal wall thickening. • Triple-contrast CT is a useful technique to diagnose gastrointestinal injury. • Triple-contrast CT helps to discriminate patients requiring observation and surgery.
Authors: Jan O Jansen; Kenji Inaba; Shelby Resnick; Gustavo P Fraga; Sizenando V Starling; Sandro B Rizoli; Kenneth D Boffard; Demetrios Demetriades Journal: Injury Date: 2012-02-15 Impact factor: 2.586
Authors: Walter L Biffl; Krista L Kaups; Tam N Pham; Susan E Rowell; Gregory J Jurkovich; Clay Cothren Burlew; J Elterman; Ernest E Moore Journal: J Trauma Date: 2011-12
Authors: John J Como; Faran Bokhari; William C Chiu; Therese M Duane; Michele R Holevar; Margaret A Tandoh; Rao R Ivatury; Thomas M Scalea Journal: J Trauma Date: 2010-03
Authors: K Shanmuganathan; Stuart E Mirvis; William C Chiu; Karen L Killeen; Gerald J F Hogan; Thomas M Scalea Journal: Radiology Date: 2004-04-22 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Muhammad Naeem; Mark J Hoegger; Frank W Petraglia; David H Ballard; Maria Zulfiqar; Michael N Patlas; Constantine Raptis; Vincent M Mellnick Journal: Radiographics Date: 2021-05-21 Impact factor: 6.312