Literature DB >> 22182859

Validating the Western Trauma Association algorithm for managing patients with anterior abdominal stab wounds: a Western Trauma Association multicenter trial.

Walter L Biffl1, Krista L Kaups, Tam N Pham, Susan E Rowell, Gregory J Jurkovich, Clay Cothren Burlew, J Elterman, Ernest E Moore.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The optimal management of stable patients with anterior abdominal stab wounds (AASWs) remains a matter of debate. A recent Western Trauma Association (WTA) multicenter trial found that exclusion of peritoneal penetration by local wound exploration (LWE) allowed immediate discharge (D/C) of 41% of patients with AASWs. Performance of computed tomography (CT) scanning or diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL) did not improve the D/C rate; however, these tests led to nontherapeutic (NONTHER) laparotomy (LAP) in 24% and 31% of cases, respectively. An algorithm was proposed that included LWE, followed by either D/C or admission for serial clinical assessments, without further imaging or invasive testing. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the algorithm in providing timely interventions for significant injuries.
METHODS: A multicenter, institutional review board-approved study enrolled patients with AASWs. Management was guided by the WTA AASW algorithm. Data on the presentation, evaluation, and clinical course were recorded prospectively.
RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-two patients (94% men, age, 34.7 years ± 0.3 years) were enrolled. Sixty-two (28%) had immediate LAP, of which 87% were therapeutic (THER). Three (1%) died and the mean length of stay (LOS) was 6.9 days. One hundred sixty patients were stable and asymptomatic, and 81 of them (51%) were managed entirely per protocol. Twenty (25%) were D/C'ed from the emergency department after (-) LWE, and 11 (14%) were taken to the operating room (OR) for LAP when their clinical condition changed. Two (2%) of the protocol group underwent NONTHER LAP, and no patient experienced morbidity or mortality related to delay in treatment. Seventy-nine (49%) patients had deviations from protocol. There were 47 CT scans, 11 DPLs, and 9 laparoscopic explorations performed. In addition to the laparoscopic procedures, 38 (48%) patients were taken to the OR based on test results rather than a change in the patient's clinical condition; 17 (45%) of these patients had a NONTHER LAP. Eighteen (23%) patients were D/C'ed from the emergency department. The LOS was no different among patients who had immediate or delayed LAP. Mean LOS after NONTHER LAP was 3.6 days ± 0.8 days.
CONCLUSIONS: The WTA proposed algorithm is designed for cost-effectiveness. Serial clinical assessments can be performed without the added expense of CT, DPL, or laparoscopy. Patients requiring LAP generally manifest early in their course, and there does not appear to be any morbidity related to a delay to OR. These data validate this approach and should be confirmed in a larger number of patients to more convincingly evaluate the algorithm's safety and cost-effectiveness compared with other approaches.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22182859     DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31823ba1de

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma        ISSN: 0022-5282


  17 in total

1.  Self-Inflicted Abdominal Stab Wounds Have a Higher Rate of Non-therapeutic Laparotomy/Laparoscopy and a Lower Risk of Injury.

Authors:  Nikolay Bugaev; Kevin McKay; Janis L Breeze; Sandra S Arabian; Reuven Rabinovici
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Management guidelines for penetrating abdominal trauma.

Authors:  Walter L Biffl; Ari Leppaniemi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Diagnostic accuracy of triple-contrast multi-detector computed tomography for detection of penetrating gastrointestinal injury: a prospective study.

Authors:  Nitima Saksobhavivat; Kathirkamanathan Shanmuganathan; Alexis R Boscak; Clint W Sliker; Deborah M Stein; Uttam K Bodanapally; Krystal Archer-Arroyo; Lisa A Miller; Thorsten R Fleiter; Melvin T Alexander; Stuart E Mirvis; Thomas M Scalea
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Role of laparoscopy in penetrating abdominal trauma: a systematic review.

Authors:  Eimer O'Malley; Emily Boyle; Adrian O'Callaghan; J Calvin Coffey; Stewart R Walsh
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Self-inflicted injuries are an important cause of penetrating traumatic injuries in Japan.

Authors:  Yoshimitsu Izawa; Masayuki Suzukawa; Alan K Lefor
Journal:  Acute Med Surg       Date:  2016-03-28

Review 6.  Laparoscopy in penetrating abdominal trauma.

Authors:  Selman Uranues; Dorin Eugen Popa; Bogdan Diaconescu; Rudolph Schrittwieser
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Complications after laparotomy for trauma: a retrospective analysis in a level I trauma centre.

Authors:  Matthijs H van Gool; Georgios F Giannakopoulos; Leo M G Geeraedts; Elly S M de Lange-de Klerk; Wietse P Zuidema
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 3.445

8.  Trauma laparoscopy: when to start and when to convert?

Authors:  Oleh Matsevych; Modise Koto; Moses Balabyeki; Colleen Aldous
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Penetrating abdominal trauma in the era of selective conservatism: a prospective cohort study in a level 1 trauma center.

Authors:  Anthony Sander; Richard Spence; James Ellsmere; Marius Hoogerboord; Sorin Edu; Andrew Nicol; Pradeep Navsaria
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2020-09-05       Impact factor: 2.374

10.  Liver trauma: WSES position paper.

Authors:  Federico Coccolini; Giulia Montori; Fausto Catena; Salomone Di Saverio; Walter Biffl; Ernest E Moore; Andrew B Peitzman; Sandro Rizoli; Gregorio Tugnoli; Massimo Sartelli; Roberto Manfredi; Luca Ansaloni
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 5.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.