Literature DB >> 26980192

The Hand Motor Hotspot is not Always Located in the Hand Knob: A Neuronavigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Study.

Rechdi Ahdab1,2,3, Samar S Ayache4,5,6, Pierre Brugières7, Wassim H Farhat1,2, Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur1,2.   

Abstract

The hand motor hot spot (hMHS) is one of the most salient parameters in transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) practice, notably used for targeting. It is commonly accepted that the hMHS corresponds to the hand representation within the primary motor cortex (M1). Anatomical and imaging studies locate this representation in a region of the central sulcus called the "hand knob". The aim of this study was to determine if the hMHS location corresponds to its expected location at the hand knob. Twelve healthy volunteers and eleven patients with chronic neuropathic pain of various origins, but not related to a brain lesion, were enrolled. Morphological magnetic resonance imaging of the brain was normal in all participants. Both hemispheres were studied in all participants except four (two patients and two healthy subjects). Cortical mapping of the hand motor area was conducted using a TMS-dedicated navigation system and recording motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in the contralateral first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle. We then determined the anatomical position of the hMHS, defined as the stimulation site providing the largest FDI-MEPs. In 45 % of hemispheres of normal subjects and 25 % of hemispheres of pain patients, the hMHS was located over the central sulcus, most frequently at the level of the hand knob. However, in the other cases, the hMHS was located outside M1, most frequently anteriorly over the precentral or middle frontal gyrus. This study shows that the hMHS does not always correspond to the hand knob and M1 location in healthy subjects or patients. Therefore, image-guided navigation is needed to improve the anatomical accuracy of TMS targeting, even for M1.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Motor cortex; Motor hotspot; Navigation; Sulcal anatomy; Transcranial magnetic stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26980192     DOI: 10.1007/s10548-016-0486-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Topogr        ISSN: 0896-0267            Impact factor:   3.020


  15 in total

1.  Determining Electrode Placement for Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: A Comparison of EEG- Versus TMS-Guided Methods.

Authors:  Tonya L Rich; Jeremiah S Menk; Kyle D Rudser; Mo Chen; Gregg D Meekins; Edgar Peña; Timothy Feyma; Kay Bawroski; Christina Bush; Bernadette T Gillick
Journal:  Clin EEG Neurosci       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 1.843

2.  Resting-State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Probabilistic Diffusion Tensor Imaging Demonstrate That the Greatest Functional and Structural Connectivity in the Hand Motor Homunculus Occurs in the Area of the Thumb.

Authors:  Shaminta Hamidian; Behroze Vachha; Mehrnaz Jenabi; Sasan Karimi; Robert J Young; Andrei I Holodny; Kyung K Peck
Journal:  Brain Connect       Date:  2018-08

3.  Corticospinal excitability and conductivity are related to the anatomy of the corticospinal tract.

Authors:  Sonia Betti; Marta Fedele; Umberto Castiello; Luisa Sartori; Sanja Budisavljević
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 3.270

4.  Local Differences in Cortical Excitability - A Systematic Mapping Study of the TMS-Evoked N100 Component.

Authors:  Daniela Roos; Lea Biermann; Tomasz A Jarczok; Stephan Bender
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  Simultaneous Recording of Motor Evoked Potentials in Hand, Wrist and Arm Muscles to Assess Corticospinal Divergence.

Authors:  Stacey L DeJong; Jayden A Bisson; Warren G Darling; Richard K Shields
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 4.275

6.  Functional MRI vs. navigated TMS to optimize M1 seed volume delineation for DTI tractography. A prospective study in patients with brain tumours adjacent to the corticospinal tract.

Authors:  Carolin Weiss Lucas; Irada Tursunova; Volker Neuschmelting; Charlotte Nettekoven; Ana-Maria Oros-Peusquens; Gabriele Stoffels; Andrea Maria Faymonville; Shah N Jon; Karl Josef Langen; Hannah Lockau; Roland Goldbrunner; Christian Grefkes
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 4.881

7.  Effects of Multi-Session Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Motor Control and Spontaneous Brain Activity in Multiple System Atrophy: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Zhu Liu; Huizi Ma; Victoria Poole; Xuemei Wang; Zhan Wang; Yaqin Yang; Lanxi Meng; Brad Manor; Junhong Zhou; Tao Feng
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 3.558

Review 8.  Meta-analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) in the Treatment of Depression.

Authors:  Yanyan Wei; Junjuan Zhu; Shengke Pan; Hui Su; Hui Li; Jijun Wang
Journal:  Shanghai Arch Psychiatry       Date:  2017-12-25

9.  TMSmap - Software for Quantitative Analysis of TMS Mapping Results.

Authors:  Pavel A Novikov; Maria A Nazarova; Vadim V Nikulin
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Pregenual or subgenual anterior cingulate cortex as potential effective region for brain stimulation of depression.

Authors:  Ying Jing; Na Zhao; Xin-Ping Deng; Zi-Jian Feng; Guo-Feng Huang; Meng Meng; Yu-Feng Zang; Jue Wang
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2020-03-08       Impact factor: 2.708

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.