| Literature DB >> 26980119 |
Ata A Rahnemai-Azar1,2, Jan-Hendrik Naendrup1,2, Ashish Soni1, Adam Olsen1, Jason Zlotnicki1,2, Volker Musahl3,4.
Abstract
Despite abundant biological, biomechanical, and clinical research, return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury remains a significant challenge. Residual rotatory knee laxity has been identified as one of the factors responsible for poor functional outcome. To improve and standardize the assessment of knee instability, a variety of instability scoring systems is available. Recently, devices to objectively quantify static and dynamic clinical exams have been developed to complement traditional subjective grading systems. These devices enable an improved evaluation of knee instability and possible associated injuries. This additional information may promote the development of new treatment algorithms and allow for individualized treatment. In this review, the different subjective laxity scores as well as complementary objective measuring systems are discussed, along with an introduction of injury to an individualized treatment algorithm.Keywords: ACL; Anterior cruciate ligament; Laxity scores; Quantitative pivot shift test; Treatment algorithm
Year: 2016 PMID: 26980119 PMCID: PMC4896882 DOI: 10.1007/s12178-016-9339-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med ISSN: 1935-9748