Literature DB >> 26979562

Debunking the viper's strike: harmless snakes kill a common assumption.

David A Penning1, Baxter Sawvel2, Brad R Moon2.   

Abstract

To survive, organisms must avoid predation and acquire nutrients and energy. Sensory systems must correctly differentiate between potential predators and prey, and elicit behaviours that adjust distances accordingly. For snakes, strikes can serve both purposes. Vipers are thought to have the fastest strikes among snakes. However, strike performance has been measured in very few species, especially non-vipers. We measured defensive strike performance in harmless Texas ratsnakes and two species of vipers, western cottonmouths and western diamond-backed rattlesnakes, using high-speed video recordings. We show that ratsnake strike performance matches or exceeds that of vipers. In contrast with the literature over the past century, vipers do not represent the pinnacle of strike performance in snakes. Both harmless and venomous snakes can strike with very high accelerations that have two key consequences: the accelerations exceed values that can cause loss of consciousness in other animals, such as the accelerations experienced by jet pilots during extreme manoeuvres, and they make the strikes faster than the sensory and motor responses of mammalian prey and predators. Both harmless and venomous snakes can strike faster than the blink of an eye and often reach a target before it can move.
© 2016 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  acceleration; strike; velocity

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26979562      PMCID: PMC4843225          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2016.0011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  10 in total

1.  Experimental evaluation of eye-blink parameters as a drowsiness measure.

Authors:  Philipp P Caffier; Udo Erdmann; Peter Ullsperger
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2003-03-14       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Physiology. Power at the tip of the tongue.

Authors:  Ulrike K Müller; Sander Kranenbarg
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-04-09       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Fast and furious: effects of body size on strike performance in an arboreal viper Trimeresurus (Cryptelytrops) albolabris.

Authors:  Anthony Herrel; Katleen Huyghe; Patricija Oković; Duje Lisičić; Zoran Tadić
Journal:  J Exp Zool A Ecol Genet Physiol       Date:  2010-09-17

4.  Comparisons of aquatic versus terrestrial predatory strikes in the pitviper, Agkistrodon piscivorus.

Authors:  Shawn E Vincent; Anthony Herrel; Duncan J Irschick
Journal:  J Exp Zool A Comp Exp Biol       Date:  2005-06-01

5.  Ontogeny of performance in vertebrates.

Authors:  Anthony Herrel; Alice C Gibb
Journal:  Physiol Biochem Zool       Date:  2005-11-23       Impact factor: 2.247

6.  Rapid innate defensive responses of mice to looming visual stimuli.

Authors:  Melis Yilmaz; Markus Meister
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  The role of gravity in the evolution of mammalian blood pressure.

Authors:  Craig R White; Roger S Seymour
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  The defensive strike of five species of lanceheads of the genus Bothrops (Viperidae).

Authors:  M S Araújo; M Martins
Journal:  Braz J Biol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.651

9.  How a heavy-bodied snake strikes quickly: high-power axial musculature in the puff adder (Bitis arietans).

Authors:  Bruce A Young
Journal:  J Exp Zool A Ecol Genet Physiol       Date:  2010-02-01

10.  Kangaroo rat locomotion: design for elastic energy storage or acceleration?

Authors:  A A Biewener; R Blickhan
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 3.312

  10 in total
  5 in total

1.  How do morphological sharpness measures relate to puncture performance in viperid snake fangs?

Authors:  S B Crofts; Y Lai; Y Hu; P S L Anderson
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Scales drive detection, attention, and memory of snakes in wild vervet monkeys (Chlorocebus pygerythrus).

Authors:  Lynne A Isbell; Stephanie F Etting
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 2.163

3.  Rattlesnakes are extremely fast and variable when striking at kangaroo rats in nature: Three-dimensional high-speed kinematics at night.

Authors:  Timothy E Higham; Rulon W Clark; Clint E Collins; Malachi D Whitford; Grace A Freymiller
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Are Humans Prepared to Detect, Fear, and Avoid Snakes? The Mismatch Between Laboratory and Ecological Evidence.

Authors:  Carlos M Coelho; Panrapee Suttiwan; Abul M Faiz; Fernando Ferreira-Santos; Andras N Zsido
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-09-11

5.  Preferential Neuronal Responses to Snakes in the Monkey Medial Prefrontal Cortex Support an Evolutionary Origin for Ophidiophobia.

Authors:  Ha Trong Dinh; Hiroshi Nishimaru; Quan Van Le; Jumpei Matsumoto; Tsuyoshi Setogawa; Rafael S Maior; Carlos Tomaz; Taketoshi Ono; Hisao Nishijo
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 3.558

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.