Literature DB >> 26979172

Impacts of forest harvesting on mobilization of Hg and MeHg in drained peatland forests on black schist or felsic bedrock.

Liisa Ukonmaanaho1, Mike Starr2, Marjatta Kantola3, Ari Laurén4, Juha Piispanen5, Heidi Pietilä6, Paavo Perämäki7, Päivi Merilä5, Hannu Fritze3, Tero Tuomivirta3, Juha Heikkinen3, Jari Mäkinen8, Tiina M Nieminen3.   

Abstract

Forest harvesting, especially when intensified harvesting method as whole-tree harvesting with stump lifting (WTHs) are used, may increase mercury (Hg) and methylmercury (MeHg) leaching to recipient water courses. The effect can be enhanced if the underlying bedrock and overburden soil contain Hg. The impact of stem-only harvesting (SOH) and WTHs on the concentrations of Hg and MeHg as well as several other variables in the ditch water was studied using a paired catchment approach in eight drained peatland-dominated catchments in Finland (2008-2012). Four of the catchments were on felsic bedrock and four on black schist bedrock containing heavy metals. Although both Hg and MeHg concentrations increased after harvesting in all treated sites according to the randomized intervention analyses (RIAs), there was only a weak indication of a harvest-induced mobilization of Hg and MeHg into the ditches. Furthermore, no clear differences between WTHs and SOH were found, although MeHg showed a nearly significant difference (p = 0.06) between the harvesting regimes. However, there was a clear bedrock effect, since the MeHg concentrations in the ditch water were higher at catchments on black schist than at those on felsic bedrock. The pH, suspended solid matter (SSM), dissolved organic carbon (DOC), and iron (Fe) concentrations increased after harvest while the sulfate (SO4-S) concentration decreased. The highest abundances of sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) were found on the sites with high MeHg concentrations. The biggest changes in ditch water concentrations occurred first 2 years after harvesting.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bedrock; Concentrations; DOC; Fe; Harvesting regime; SO4-S; SSM

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26979172     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-016-5210-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  19 in total

1.  Total and methyl mercury concentrations and fluxes from small boreal forest catchments in Finland.

Authors:  Petri Porvari; Matti Verta
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 8.071

2.  Forestry practices increase mercury and methyl mercury output from boreal forest catchments.

Authors:  Petri Porvari; Matti Verta; John Munthe; Merja Haapanen
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2003-06-01       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Mercury methylation from unexpected sources: molybdate-inhibited freshwater sediments and an iron-reducing bacterium.

Authors:  Emily J Fleming; E Erin Mack; Peter G Green; Douglas C Nelson
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Physical controls on total and methylmercury concentrations in streams and lakes of the northeastern USA.

Authors:  James B Shanley; Neil C Kamman; Thomas A Clair; Ann Chalmers
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.823

5.  The effects of forestry on Hg bioaccumulation in nemoral/boreal waters and recommendations for good silvicultural practice.

Authors:  Kevin Bishop; Craig Allan; Lage Bringmark; Edenise Garcia; Sofie Hellsten; Lars Högbom; Kjell Johansson; Anja Lomander; Markus Meili; John Munthe; Mats Nilsson; Petri Porvari; Ulf Skyllberg; Rasmus Sorensen; Therese Zetterberg; Staffan Akerblom
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.129

6.  The effects of forest harvest operations on mercury and methylmercury in two boreal streams: relatively small changes in the first two years prior to site preparation.

Authors:  Rasmus Sørensen; Markus Meili; Lars Lambertsson; Claudia von Brömssen; Kevin Bishop
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.129

7.  Sulfate-reducing bacteria: principal methylators of mercury in anoxic estuarine sediment.

Authors:  G C Compeau; R Bartha
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  The genetic basis for bacterial mercury methylation.

Authors:  Jerry M Parks; Alexander Johs; Mircea Podar; Romain Bridou; Richard A Hurt; Steven D Smith; Stephen J Tomanicek; Yun Qian; Steven D Brown; Craig C Brandt; Anthony V Palumbo; Jeremy C Smith; Judy D Wall; Dwayne A Elias; Liyuan Liang
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Impact of forestry on total and methyl-mercury in surface waters: distinguishing effects of logging and site preparation.

Authors:  Karin Eklöf; Jakob Schelker; Rasmus Sørensen; Markus Meili; Hjalmar Laudon; Claudia von Brömssen; Kevin Bishop
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 9.028

10.  Development and comparison of SYBR Green quantitative real-time PCR assays for detection and enumeration of sulfate-reducing bacteria in stored swine manure.

Authors:  C Spence; T R Whitehead; M A Cotta
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.772

View more
  1 in total

1.  Challenges and opportunities for managing aquatic mercury pollution in altered landscapes.

Authors:  Heileen Hsu-Kim; Chris S Eckley; Dario Achá; Xinbin Feng; Cynthia C Gilmour; Sofi Jonsson; Carl P J Mitchell
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 5.129

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.