Literature DB >> 24666406

Impact of forestry on total and methyl-mercury in surface waters: distinguishing effects of logging and site preparation.

Karin Eklöf1, Jakob Schelker, Rasmus Sørensen, Markus Meili, Hjalmar Laudon, Claudia von Brömssen, Kevin Bishop.   

Abstract

Forestry operations can increase the export of mercury (both total and methyl) to surface waters. However, little is known about the relative contribution of different forestry practices. We address this question using a paired-catchment study that distinguishes the effects of site preparation from the antecedent logging. Runoff water from three catchments, two harvested and one untreated control, was sampled biweekly during one year prior to logging, two years after logging, and three years after site preparation. The logging alone did not significantly increase the concentrations of either total or methyl-mercury in runoff, but export increased by 50-70% in one of the harvested catchments as a consequence of increased runoff volume. The combined effects of logging and site preparation increased total and methyl-mercury concentrations by 30-50% relative to preharvest conditions in both treated catchments. The more pronounced concentration effect after site preparation compared to logging could be related to site preparation being conducted during summer. This caused more soil disturbance than logging, which was done during winter with snow covering the ground. The results suggest that the cumulative impact of forest harvest on catchment mercury outputs depends on when and how forestry operations are implemented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24666406     DOI: 10.1021/es404879p

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  8 in total

1.  Stream Mercury Export in Response to Contemporary Timber Harvesting Methods (Pacific Coastal Mountains, Oregon, USA).

Authors:  Chris S Eckley; Collin Eagles-Smith; Michael T Tate; Brandon Kowalski; Robert Danehy; Sherri L Johnson; David P Krabbenhoft
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Impacts of forest harvesting on mobilization of Hg and MeHg in drained peatland forests on black schist or felsic bedrock.

Authors:  Liisa Ukonmaanaho; Mike Starr; Marjatta Kantola; Ari Laurén; Juha Piispanen; Heidi Pietilä; Paavo Perämäki; Päivi Merilä; Hannu Fritze; Tero Tuomivirta; Juha Heikkinen; Jari Mäkinen; Tiina M Nieminen
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Organic horizon and mineral soil mercury along three clear-cut forest chronosequences across the northeastern USA.

Authors:  Justin B Richardson; Chelsea L Petrenko; Andrew J Friedland
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-10-08       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Sequestration of Mercury in Soils under Scots Pine and Silver Fir Stands Located in the Proximity to a Roadway.

Authors:  Piotr Gruba; Mateusz Kania; Dawid Kupka; Marcin Pietrzykowski
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Surface-air mercury fluxes and a watershed mass balance in forested and harvested catchments.

Authors:  Chris S Eckley; Collin Eagles-Smith; Michael T Tate; David P Krabbenhoft
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 9.988

6.  Challenges and opportunities for managing aquatic mercury pollution in altered landscapes.

Authors:  Heileen Hsu-Kim; Chris S Eckley; Dario Achá; Xinbin Feng; Cynthia C Gilmour; Sofi Jonsson; Carl P J Mitchell
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 5.129

7.  Toward an Assessment of the Global Inventory of Present-Day Mercury Releases to Freshwater Environments.

Authors:  David Kocman; Simon J Wilson; Helen M Amos; Kevin H Telmer; Frits Steenhuisen; Elsie M Sunderland; Robert P Mason; Peter Outridge; Milena Horvat
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Managing Swedish forestry's impact on mercury in fish: Defining the impact and mitigation measures.

Authors:  Karin Eklöf; Rolf Lidskog; Kevin Bishop
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 5.129

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.