Literature DB >> 26977369

Multimodal 3D cancer-mimicking optical phantom.

Gennifer T Smith1, Kristen L Lurie1, Dimitar V Zlatev2, Joseph C Liao2, Audrey K Ellerbee Bowden1.   

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) organ-mimicking phantoms provide realistic imaging environments for testing various aspects of optical systems, including for evaluating new probe designs, characterizing the diagnostic potential of new technologies, and assessing novel image processing algorithms prior to validation in real tissue. We introduce and characterize the use of a new material, Dragon Skin (Smooth-On Inc.), and fabrication technique, air-brushing, for fabrication of a 3D phantom that mimics the appearance of a real organ under multiple imaging modalities. We demonstrate the utility of the material and technique by fabricating the first 3D, hollow bladder phantom with realistic normal and multi-stage pathology features suitable for endoscopic detection using the gold standard imaging technique, white light cystoscopy (WLC), as well as the complementary imaging modalities of optical coherence tomography and blue light cystoscopy, which are aimed at improving the sensitivity and specificity of WLC to bladder cancer detection. The flexibility of the material and technique used for phantom construction allowed for the representation of a wide range of diseased tissue states, ranging from inflammation (benign) to high-grade cancerous lesions. Such phantoms can serve as important tools for trainee education and evaluation of new endoscopic instrumentation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  (110.4500) Optical coherence tomography; (160.4760) Optical properties; (170.3880) Medical and biological imaging; (170.7230) Urology

Year:  2016        PMID: 26977369      PMCID: PMC4771478          DOI: 10.1364/BOE.7.000648

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Opt Express        ISSN: 2156-7085            Impact factor:   3.732


  34 in total

1.  Structured three-dimensional optical phantom for optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Andrea Curatolo; Brendan F Kennedy; David D Sampson
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 3.894

2.  Retina-simulating phantom for optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Jigesh Baxi; William Calhoun; Yasir Jamal Sepah; Daniel X Hammer; Ilko Ilev; T Joshua Pfefer; Quan Dong Nguyen; Anant Agrawal
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.170

3.  Artery phantoms for intravascular optical coherence tomography: diseased arteries.

Authors:  Charles-Étienne Bisaillon; Guy Lamouche
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.170

4.  Multifunctional epidermal electronics printed directly onto the skin.

Authors:  Woon-Hong Yeo; Yun-Soung Kim; Jongwoo Lee; Abid Ameen; Luke Shi; Ming Li; Shuodao Wang; Rui Ma; Sung Hun Jin; Zhan Kang; Yonggang Huang; John A Rogers
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 30.849

5.  Grading and staging of bladder carcinoma in transurethral resection specimens. Correlation with 105 matched cystectomy specimens.

Authors:  L Cheng; R M Neumann; A L Weaver; J C Cheville; B C Leibovich; D M Ramnani; B G Scherer; A Nehra; H Zincke; D G Bostwick
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.493

6.  Poly(dimethylsiloxane) coatings for controlled drug release--polymer modifications.

Authors:  J Schulze Nahrup; Z M Gao; J E Mark; A Sakr
Journal:  Int J Pharm       Date:  2004-02-11       Impact factor: 5.875

7.  Bladder wall penetration of intravesical mitomycin C in dogs.

Authors:  M G Wientjes; J T Dalton; R A Badalament; J R Drago; J L Au
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1991-08-15       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Fluorescence cystoscopy with high-resolution optical coherence tomography imaging as an adjunct reduces false-positive findings in the diagnosis of urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.

Authors:  Joerg Schmidbauer; Mesut Remzi; Tobias Klatte; Matthias Waldert; Julian Mauermann; Martin Susani; Michael Marberger
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 9.  The future of bladder cancer care in the USA.

Authors:  Alan L Kaplan; Mark S Litwin; Karim Chamie
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 14.432

10.  Optical coherence tomography for bladder cancer -- ready as a surrogate for optical biopsy? Results of a prospective mono-centre study.

Authors:  A Karl; H Stepp; E Willmann; A Buchner; Y Hocaoglu; C Stief; S Tritschler
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 2.175

View more
  4 in total

1.  Formulation of image fusion as a constrained least squares optimization problem.

Authors:  Nicholas Dwork; Eric M Lasry; John M Pauly; Jorge Balbás
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-02-28

Review 2.  3D printing in urology: Is it really promising?

Authors:  Berat Cem Özgür; Ali Ayyıldız
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2018-01-08

3.  Proceedings of the 3rd Annual Albert Institute for Bladder Cancer Research Symposium.

Authors:  Thomas W Flaig; Ashish M Kamat; Donna Hansel; Molly A Ingersoll; H Barton Grossman; Cathy Mendelsohn; David DeGraff; Joseph C Liao; John A Taylor
Journal:  Bladder Cancer       Date:  2017-07-27

4.  Birefringent tissue-mimicking phantom for polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography imaging.

Authors:  Shuang Chang; Jessica Handwerker; Giovanna A Giannico; Sam S Chang; Audrey K Bowden
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 3.170

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.